Dataset Information

Applied comparison of large-scale propensity score matching and cardinality matching for causal inference in observational research.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Cardinality matching (CM), a novel matching technique, finds the largest matched sample meeting prespecified balance criteria thereby overcoming limitations of propensity score matching (PSM) associated with limited covariate overlap, which are especially pronounced in studies with small sample sizes. The current study proposes a framework for large-scale CM (LS-CM); and compares large-scale PSM (LS-PSM) and LS-CM in terms of post-match sample size, covariate balance and residual confounding at progressively smaller sample sizes.

Methods

Evaluation of LS-PSM and LS-CM within a comparative cohort study of new users of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and thiazide or thiazide-like diuretic monotherapy identified from a U.S. insurance claims database. Candidate covariates included patient demographics, and all observed prior conditions, drug exposures and procedures. Propensity scores were calculated using LASSO regression, and candidate covariates with non-zero beta coefficients in the propensity model were defined as matching covariates for use in LS-CM. One-to-one matching was performed using progressively tighter parameter settings. Covariate balance was assessed using standardized mean differences. Hazard ratios for negative control outcomes perceived as unassociated with treatment (i.e., true hazard ratio of 1) were estimated using unconditional Cox models. Residual confounding was assessed using the expected systematic error of the empirical null distribution of negative control effect estimates compared to the ground truth. To simulate diverse research conditions, analyses were repeated within 10 %, 1 and 0.5 % subsample groups with increasingly limited covariate overlap.

Results

A total of 172,117 patients (ACEI: 129,078; thiazide: 43,039) met the study criteria. As compared to LS-PSM, LS-CM was associated with increased sample retention. Although LS-PSM achieved balance across all matching covariates within the full study population, substantial matching covariate imbalance was observed within the 1 and 0.5 % subsample groups. Meanwhile, LS-CM achieved matching covariate balance across all analyses. LS-PSM was associated with better candidate covariate balance within the full study population. Otherwise, both matching techniques achieved comparable candidate covariate balance and expected systematic error.

Conclusions

LS-CM found the largest matched sample meeting prespecified balance criteria while achieving comparable candidate covariate balance and residual confounding. We recommend LS-CM as an alternative to LS-PSM in studies with small sample sizes or limited covariate overlap.

SUBMITTER: Fortin SP

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8146256 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background Extrathyroidal extension is a major risk factor for poor prognosis in papillary thyroid cancer. However, the effect of different degrees of extrathyroidal extension on prognosis remains controversial. We performed a retrospective study to elucidate how the extent of extrathyroidal extension in papillary thyroid cancer affected the clinical prognosis of patients and its covariates. Methods The study included 108,426 patients with papillary thyroid cancer. We categorized the extent of extension into none, capsule, strap muscles, and other organs. Three causal inference methods for retrospective studies, namely, inverse probability of treatment weighting, standardized mortality ratio weighting, and propensity score matching analysis, were used to minimize potential selection bias. Kaplan–Meier analysis and univariate Cox regression analyses were applied to analyze the precise effect of ETE on survival in papillary thyroid cancer patients. Results In the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, only extrathyroidal extension into or beyond the strap muscles was statistically significant for both overall survival (OS) and thyroid cancer-specific survival (TCSS). In univariate Cox regression analyses before and after matching or weighting based on causal inference, extrathyroidal extension into soft tissues or other organs is a high-risk factor for both overall survival and thyroid cancer-specific survival. Sensitivity analysis revealed that lower overall survival was observed in patients with older age (≥55) and larger tumor size (>2 cm) of papillary thyroid cancer with extrathyroidal extension into or beyond the strap muscles. Conclusions Our study indicates that extrathyroidal extension into soft tissues or other organs is a high-risk factor in all papillary thyroid cancer. Even though invasion into the strap muscles did not seem to be a marker for poor prognosis, it still impaired the overall survival of patients with older age (≥55 years old) or larger tumor size (>2 cm). Further investigation is needed to confirm our results and to clarify further risk factors independent of extrathyroidal extension.

Project description:BackgroundFor women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF), the clinical benefit of embryo transfer at the blastocyst stage (Day 5) versus cleavage stage (Day 3) remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to compare the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and odds of live birth of Day 3 and Day 5 embryo transfer, and more importantly, to address the issue that patients were chosen to receive either transfer protocol due to their underlying clinical characteristics, i.e., confounding by indication.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of 9,090 IVF cycles collected by Lee Women's Hospital in Taichung, Taiwan from 1998 to 2014. We utilized the method of propensity score matching to mimic a randomized controlled trial (RCT) where each patient with Day 5 transfer was matched by another patient with Day 3 transfer with respect to other clinical characteristics. Implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and odds of live birth were compared for women underwent Day 5 transfer and Day 3 transfer to estimate the causal effects. We further investigated the causal effects in subgroups by stratifying age and anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH).ResultsOur analyses uncovered an evidence of a significant difference in implantation rate (p=0.04) favoring Day 5 transfer, and showed that Day 3 and Day 5 transfers made no difference in both odds of live birth (p=0.27) and clinical pregnancy rate (p=0.11). With the increase of gestational age, the trend toward non-significance of embryo transfer day in our result appeared to be consistent for subgroups stratified by age and AMH, while all analyses stratified by age and AMH were not statistically significant.ConclusionsWe conclude that for women without strong indications for Day 3 or Day 5 transfer, there is a small significant difference in implantation rate in favor of Day 5 transfer. However, the two protocols have indistinguishable outcomes on odds of live birth and clinical pregnancy rate.