Dataset Information

A comparison of three different approaches to defining frailty in older patients with multiple myeloma.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

As the aging population grows, interest in applying the concept of frailty to older adults with cancer has increased. This study examines the prevalence of frailty in older patients with multiple myeloma using three frailty models.

Methods

In this secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study, 40 adults aged ≥65 with myeloma completed the Cancer and Aging Research Group geriatric assessment within three months of initial diagnosis. Geriatric assessment data was used to categorize patients' frailty status according to three indices: The International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Frailty Index, the Revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index (R-MCI), and the Carolina Frailty Index (CFI). Agreement between the indices was examined using Cohen's kappa.

Results

Twenty-eight patients were classified as frail by at least one of the models. However, only slight agreement exists on the classification of frailty among the indices, with little concordance among the models (Kappa 0.03-0.12). Only three patients were categorized as frail by all three models.

Conclusion

In a cohort of 40 older adults with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, three frailty indices have differing approaches to operationalizing frailty resulting, in different patients being categorized as frail. Little agreement existed between the models. Further studies are needed to explore the utility of these models in predicting treatment toxicity and prognosis.

SUBMITTER: Isaacs A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8161529 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Immunoglobulin light chains are classified as middle molecule uremic toxins able to interact with B lymphocyte membranes leading to the activation of transmembrane signaling. The ensuing impairment of neutrophil function can contribute to the chronic inflammation state of uremic patients, and the increased risk of bacterial infections or vascular calcifications. The aim of this crossover observational study was to assess the difference in free light chain removal by three different hemodialysis filters in patients not affected by multiple myeloma.Free light chain removal was compared in the polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) membrane Filtryzer BK-F, the polyphenylene HFR17 filter and the conventional polysulfone filter F7HPS. Twenty chronic hemodialysis patients were enrolled: mean age was 67.7?±?17.0 years, M/F?=?14/6, dialysis vintage (months) 25.5?±?32.0. The patients were randomized into two groups of treatment lasting 6 weeks each. The dialysis sessions checked were the midweek sessions and the blood was drawn at times 0, 120' and 240'. Kappa (k) and lambda (?) light chain levels, ?2microglobulin (?2M), C reactive protein (CRP) and albumin were checked.K light chain levels were 345.0?±?100.0 mg/L, ? light chains were 121.4?±?27.0 mg/L. The values of k light chains at times 120' and 240' were significantly lower with PMMA and HFR17 than those obtained with F7. The reduction ratio per session (RRs) for k light chains was 44.1?±?4.3% with HFR17, 55.3?±?3.4% with PMMA, 25.7?±?8.3% with F7 (p?=?0.018). The RRs for ? light chains was 30.3?±?2.9% with HFR17, 37.8?±?17.3% with PMMA, 14.0?±?3.9% with F7 (p?=?0.032). As to ?2M, RRs was 42.4?±?3.2% with HFR17 vs. 33.9?±?2.8% with PMMA vs. 6.3?±?1.9% with F7 (p?=?0.022). The three filters tested showed no differences in CRP or albumin levels.In terms of light chain and ?2M removal, the PMMA and on-line HFR filters are similar and both are significantly more effective than the F7 filter in chronic dialysis patients.The present trial was registered retrospectively ( NCT02950389 , 31/10/2016).