Dataset Information

Safety and Efficacy of Cetuximab-Based Salvage Chemotherapy After Checkpoint Inhibitors in Head and Neck Cancer.

ABSTRACT:

Background

There are still few data on the activity and safety of cetuximab-based salvage chemotherapy after immunotherapy (SCAI) in patients with squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCCHN).

Materials and methods

This was a retrospective study of patients with SCCHN who received cetuximab-based SCAI after programmed cell death protein 1 or programmed cell death ligand 1(PD[L]1) inhibitors. Overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) with SCAI and with last chemotherapy before immunotherapy (LCBI) by RECIST 1.1, percentage change from baseline in target lesions (PCTL), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), treatment compliance, and toxicity were evaluated.

Results

Between March 2016 and November 2019, 23 patients were identified. SCAI consisted of cetuximab-based combinations (3-weekly cisplatin-5FU-cetuximab [n = 2], weekly paclitaxel-cetuximab [n = 17], weekly cisplatin-cetuximab [n = 2], weekly carboplatin-paclitaxel-cetuximab [n = 2]). ORR was 56.5% (11 partial response, 2 complete response). DCR was 78.3%. Among 13 objective responders, median best PCTL was -53.5% (range, -30% to -100%). Median OS and PFS were 12 months and 6 months, respectively. In 10 patients receiving LCBI, ORR to LCBI was 40%, whereas ORR to SCAI achieved 60%. In LCBI-treated patients, median PFS with LCBI was 8 months and median PFS and OS with SCAI were 7 months and 12 months, respectively. Reduced dose intensity of the chemotherapy and cetuximab components occurred in 82.6% and 52.2% of the patients. Grade 1 or 2 adverse events (AEs) occurred in all patients. Grade 3 or 4 AEs developed in 65%, being grade 3 in all of them except in one patient (grade 4 neutropenia). There were no treatment-related deaths.

Conclusion

Cetuximab-based salvage chemotherapy after PD(L)1 inhibitors associated with high response rates and deep tumor reductions with a manageable safety profile. Subsequent lines of therapy may explain the long survival achieved in our series. These results invite to design studies to elucidate the best therapeutic sequence in patients with SCCHN in the immunotherapy era.

Implications for practice

Cetuximab-based salvage chemotherapy (SCAI) achieved high response rates in patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCCHN) after progression to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Objective response rate was higher than and progression-free survival was comparable to that of chemotherapy administered before immunotherapy (IO). In most patients, SCAI consisted of weekly, well-tolerated regimens. These observations have implications for current practice because of the limited evidence to date in SCCHN and the scant therapeutic options in this disease and invite to elucidate which may be the best treatment sequence for patients with head and neck cancer in the IO era.

SUBMITTER: Cabezas-Camarero S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8176971 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Cetuximab, in combination with platinum chemotherapy plus 5-fluoruracil (5-FU), is approved for the first-line treatment of recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Cetuximab manufactured by ImClone (US commercial cetuximab) potentially results in higher systemic exposures than cetuximab manufactured by Boehringer Ingelheim (BI-manufactured cetuximab). This prospective, randomized, double-blind study compared the safety profiles of the two cetuximab formulations. METHODS:Patients with previously untreated locoregionally recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN were randomly assigned to receive the same dose of US commercial cetuximab (Arm A) or BI-manufactured cetuximab (Arm B), each in combination with cisplatin or carboplatin plus 5-FU. The primary outcome was all-grade, all-cause treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS:The majority of patients experienced ? 1 TEAE, regardless of causality (Arm A: 75/77 patients, 97.4%; Arm B: 68/71 patients, 95.8%). TEAEs with the highest incidence included nausea, fatigue, and hypomagnesemia in both arms. The absolute risk difference between the two arms for patients experiencing at least one adverse event (AE) was 0.029 (p = 0.281, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.024, 0.082) for AEs regardless of causality and 0.005 (p = 0.915, 95% CI: -0.092, 0.103) for AEs possibly related to study drug. There were no significant differences between the two arms in the incidence of acneiform rash, cardiac events, infusion reactions, or hypomagnesemia. Overall survival, progression-free survival, and overall response rates were similar in the two arms. CONCLUSIONS:There were no clinically meaningful differences in safety between US commercial cetuximab and BI-manufactured cetuximab in combination with platinum-based therapy with 5-FU in patients with locoregionally recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN. The use of US commercial cetuximab in this combination chemotherapy regimen did not result in any unexpected safety signals. The efficacy results of this study are consistent with the efficacy results of the cetuximab arm of the EXTREME study. TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01081041 ; date of registration: March 3, 2010).

Project description:To show the relationship between antibody delivery and therapeutic efficacy in head and neck cancers, in this study we evaluated the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted immunotherapy and radioimmunotherapy by quantitative positron emission tomography (PET) imaging.EGFR expression on UM-SCC-22B and SCC1 human head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) cells were determined by flow cytometry and immunostaining. Tumor delivery and distribution of cetuximab in tumor-bearing nude mice were evaluated with small animal PET using (64)Cu-DOTA-cetuximab. The in vitro toxicity of cetuximab to HNSCC cells was evaluated by MTT assay. The tumor-bearing mice were then treated with four doses of cetuximab at 10 mg/kg per dose, and tumor growth was evaluated by caliper measurement. FDG PET was done after the third dose of antibody administration to evaluate tumor response. Apoptosis and tumor cell proliferation after cetuximab treatment were analyzed by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling and Ki-67 staining. Radioimmunotherapy was done with (90)Y-DOTA-cetuximab.EGFR expression on UM-SCC-22B cells is lower than that on SCC1 cells. However, the UM-SCC-22B tumors showed much higher (64)Cu-DOTA-cetuximab accumulation than the SCC1 tumors. Cetuximab-induced apoptosis in SCC1 tumors and tumor growth was significantly inhibited, whereas an agonistic effect of cetuximab on UM-SCC-22B tumor growth was observed. After cetuximab treatment, the SCC1 tumors showed decreased FDG uptake, and the UM-SCC-22B tumors had increased FDG uptake. UM-SCC-22B tumors are more responsive to (90)Y-DOTA-cetuximab treatment than SCC1 tumors, partially due to the high tumor accumulation of the injected antibody.Cetuximab has an agonistic effect on the growth of UM-SCC-22B tumors, indicating that tumor response to cetuximab treatment is not necessarily related to EGFR expression and antibody delivery efficiency, as determined by PET imaging. Although PET imaging with antibodies as tracers has limited function in patient screening, it can provide guidance for targeted therapy using antibodies as delivery vehicles.