Dataset Information

Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis for Recurrence in Early-Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Despite surgical resection, early lung adenocarcinoma has a recurrence rate of 20-50%. No clear predictive markers for recurrence of early lung adenocarcinoma are available. Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) is rarely used to identify recurrence-related genes. We aimed to identify genetic alterations that can predict recurrence, by comparing the molecular profiles of patient groups with and without recurrence.

Methods

Tissues from 230 patients with resected stage I-II lung adenocarcinoma (median follow-up: 49 months) were analyzed via targeted NGS for 207 cancer-related genes. The recurrence-free survival according to the number and type of mutation was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Independent predictive biomarkers related to recurrence were identified using the Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

Recurrence was observed in 64 patients (27.8%). In multivariate analysis adjusted for age, sex, smoking history, stage, surgical mode, and visceral pleural invasion, the CTNNB1 mutation and fusion genes (ALK, ROS1, RET) were negative prognostic factors for recurrence in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma (HR 4.47, p = 0.001; HR 2.73, p = 0.009). EGFR mutation was a favorable factor (HR 0.51, p = 0.016), but the CTNNB1/EGFR co-mutations were negative predictors (HR 19.2, p < 0.001). TP53 mutation was a negative predictor compared with EGFR mutation for recurrence (HR 5.24, p = 0.02).

Conclusions

Targeted NGS can provide valuable information to predict recurrence and identify patients at high recurrence risk, facilitating selection of the treatment strategy among close monitoring and adjuvant-targeted therapy. Larger datasets are required to validate these findings.

SUBMITTER: Kim IA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8184531 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Identification of targetable molecular changes is essential for selecting appropriate treatment in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma. Methods: In this study, a Sanger sequencing plus Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) sequential approach was compared with a Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)-based approach for the detection of actionable genomic mutations in an experimental cohort (EC) of 117 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma. Its applicability was assessed in small biopsies and cytology specimens previously tested for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutational status, comparing the molecular changes identified and the impact on clinical outcomes. Subsequently, an NGS-based approach was applied and tested in an implementation cohort (IC) in clinical practice. Using Sanger and FISH, patients were classified as EGFR-mutated (n = 22, 18.8%), ALK-mutated (n = 9, 7.7%), and unclassifiable (UC) (n = 86, 73.5%). Retesting the EC with NGS led to the identification of at least one gene variant in 56 (47.9%) patients, totaling 68 variants among all samples. Still, in the EC, combining NGS plus FISH for ALK, patients were classified as 23 (19.7%) EGFR; 20 (17.1%) KRAS; five (4.3%) B-Raf proto-oncogene (BRAF); one (0.9%) Erb-B2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinase 2 (ERBB2); one (0.9%) STK11; one (0.9%) TP53, and nine (7.7%) ALK mutated. Only 57 (48.7%) remained genomically UC, reducing the UC rate by 24.8%. Fourteen (12.0%) patients presented synchronous alterations. Concordance between NGS and Sanger for EGFR status was very high (? = 0.972; 99.1%). In the IC, a combined DNA and RNA NGS panel was used in 123 patients. Genomic variants were found in 79 (64.2%). In addition, eight (6.3%) EML4-ALK, four (3.1%), KIF5B-RET, four (3.1%) CD74-ROS1, one (0.8%) TPM3-NTRK translocations and three (2.4%) exon 14 skipping MET Proto-Oncogene (MET) mutations were detected, and 36% were treatable alterations. Conclusions: This study supports the use of NGS as the first-line test for genomic profiling of patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma.

Project description:IntroductionHistorically, high rates of actionable driver mutations have been reported in never-smokers with lung adenocarcinoma (ADC). In the era of modern, comprehensive cancer mutation sequencing, this relationship necessitates a more detailed analysis.MethodsAll Mount Sinai patients between January 1, 2015, and June 1, 2020, with a diagnosis of ADC of any stage with known smoking status who received genomic testing were included. Most patients were analyzed using the Sema4 hotspot panel or the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay version 3 next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel conducted at Sema4. Patients were considered fully genotyped if they were comprehensively analyzed for alterations in EGFR, KRAS, MET, ALK, RET, ROS1, BRAF, NTRK1-3, and ERBB2, otherwise they were considered partially genotyped.ResultsTwo hundred and thirty-six never-smokers and 671 smokers met the above criteria. Of the never-smokers, 201 (85%) had a driver mutation with 167 (71%) considered actionable (ie, those with US Food and Drug Administration-approved agents). Among smokers, 439 (65%) had an identified driver mutation with 258 (38%) actionable (P < .0001). When comprehensively sequenced, 95% (70/74) of never-smokers had a driver mutation with 78% (58/74) actionable; whereas, for smokers, 75% (135/180) had a driver with only 47% (74/180) actionable (P < .0001). Within mutations groups, EGFR G719X and KRAS G12Cs were more common to smokers. For stage IV patients harboring EGFR-mutant tumors treated with EGFR-directed therapies, never-smokers had significantly improved OS compared to smokers (hazard ratio = 2.71; P = .025). In multivariable analysis, Asian ancestry and female sex remained significant predictors of (1) OS in stage IV patients and (2) likelihood of harboring a receptor of fusion-based driver.ConclusionComprehensive NGS revealed driver alterations in 95% of never-smokers, with the majority having an associated therapy available. All efforts should be exhausted to identify or rule out the presence of an actionable driver mutation in all metastatic lung ADC.