Dataset Information

Cytotoxic and apoptotic data of BPA and BPA alternatives TMBPF, BPAF, and BPS in female adult rat and human stem cells.

ABSTRACT: Here, we used female adult rat adipose-derived stem cells (rASCs) and human adipose-derived stem cells (hASCs) to compare the toxicities and potencies of several widespread environmental toxins that may be endocrine-disrupting chemicals, including bisphenol A (BPA), and the newer BPA alternatives bisphenol S (BPS), bisphenol AF (BPAF), and tetramethyl bisphenol F (TMBPF). Adult stem cells were cultured to 80% confluency in vitro and then exposed to BPA (1 and 10 µM), 17β-estradiol (E2; 10 µM), BPS (1 and 10 µM), BPAF (3 × 10^-3-30 µM), TMBPF (0.01-50 µM), or control media alone (with 0.01% ethanol) for varying time intervals from 20 min to 5 hrs. Using several cellular assays, the levels of cell death, apoptosis, caspase-6 activation, and potencies were compared across chemical treatments and vehicle-treated controls. There was significantly decreased cell viability and increased apoptosis in rat and human stem cells treated with each BPA analog, as early as 20 min of exposure, and at low doses. With higher magnification, higher resolution imaging it was evident that in many of the BPA analog-treated cells, the Apopxin Deep Red dye indicative of apoptosis was localized to the cytoplasmic compartments of cells, while the nuclear green DCS1 dye indicative of late-stage apoptosis and necrosis was localized to the nuclei of cells. Notably, BPAF and TMBPF showed cytotoxicity in a dose-dependent manner (BPAF LC₅₀ = 0.014 µM (rASCs) and 0.009 µM (hASCs); TMBPF LC₅₀ = 0.88 µM (rASCs) and 0.06 µM (hASCs); lethal concentration with 50% survival). The rank order of potency was BPAF>TMBPF>BPA>BPS. The majority of cell death was due to apoptosis as indicated by high levels of activated caspase-6 in the cytoplasm of almost 100% of cells treated with the BPA analogs. This data allows for further confirmation of caspase-6-mediated apoptosis using higher magnification imaging that definitively demonstrate the cytotoxic and apoptotic effects of these BPA analogs. For a complete description, interpretation, and discussion of the data refer to the article in press [1].

SUBMITTER: Harnett KG

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8187815 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:The endocrine disrupting chemical bisphenol A (BPA) has been facing stricter regulations in recent years. BPA analogs, such as the bisphenols S, F, and AF (BPS, BPF, and BPAF) are increasingly used as replacement chemicals, although they were found to exert estrogenic effects similar to those of BPA. Research has shown that only the parent compounds have affinity to the estrogen receptors, suggesting that the pharmacokinetic behavior of bisphenols (BPs) can influence their potency.Our goal was to compare the pharmacokinetic behaviors of BPA, BPS, BPF, and BPAF for different age groups after environmentally relevant external exposures by taking into account substance-specific metabolism kinetics and partitioning behavior. This comparison allowed us to investigate the consequences of replacing BPA with other BPs.We readjusted a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for peroral exposure to BPA and extended it to include dermal exposure. We experimentally assessed hepatic and intestinal glucuronidation kinetics of BPS, BPF, and BPAF to parametrize the model for these BPs and calibrated the BPS model with a biomonitoring study. We used the PBPK models to compare resulting internal exposures and focused on females of childbearing age in a two-dimensional Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis.Within environmentally relevant concentration ranges, BPAF and BPS were glucuronized at highest and lowest rates, respectively, in the intestine and the liver. The predominant routes of BPS and BPAF exposure were peroral and dermal exposure, respectively. The calibration of the BPS model with measured concentrations showed that enterohepatic recirculation may be important. Assuming equal external exposures, BPS exposure led to the highest internal concentrations of unconjugated BPs.Our data suggest that the replacement of BPA with structural analogs may not lower the risk for endocrine disruption. Exposure to both BPS and BPAF might be more critical than BPA exposure, if their respective estrogenic potencies are taken into account. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP2739.

Project description:BackgroundPrevious work determined that early life exposure to low-dose Bisphenol A (BPA) increased rat prostate cancer risk with aging. Herein, we report on prostate-specific results from CLARITY-BPA (Consortium Linking Academic and Regulatory Insights on BPA Toxicity), which aims to resolve uncertainties regarding BPA toxicity.ObjectivesWe sought to a) reassess whether a range of BPA exposures drives prostate pathology and/or alters prostatic susceptibility to hormonal carcinogenesis, and b) test whether chronic low-dose BPA targets prostate epithelial stem and progenitor cells.MethodsSprague-Dawley rats were gavaged daily with vehicle, ethinyl estradiol (EE) or [Formula: see text] BPA/kg-BW during development or chronically, and prostate pathology was assessed at one year. One developmentally exposed cohort was given testosterone plus estradiol ([Formula: see text]) implants at day 90 to promote carcinogenesis with aging. Epithelial stem and progenitor cells were isolated by prostasphere (PS) culture from dorsolateral prostates (DLP) of rats continuously exposed for six months to [Formula: see text] BPA/kg-BW. Gene expression was analyzed by quantitative real time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR).ResultsExposure to BPA alone at any dose did not drive prostate pathology. However, rats treated with EE, 2.5, 250, or [Formula: see text] BPA/kg-BW plus [Formula: see text] showed greater severity of lateral prostate intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), and DLP ductal adenocarcinoma multiplicity was markedly elevated in tumor-bearing rats exposed to [Formula: see text]-BW. DLP stem cells, assessed by PS number, doubled with chronic EE and [Formula: see text] exposures. PS size, reflecting progenitor cell proliferation, was greater at 25 and [Formula: see text] BPA doses, which also shifted lineage commitment toward basal progenitors while reducing luminal progenitor cells.ConclusionsTogether, these results confirm and extend previous evidence using a rat model and human prostate epithelial cells that low-dose BPA augments prostate cancer susceptibility and alters adult prostate stem cell homeostasis. Therefore, we propose that BPA exposures may contribute to the increased carcinogenic risk in humans that occurs with aging. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP3953.

Project description:ObjectiveThis study was aimed to explore the role of AhR in the neurotoxicity of adult zebrafish induced by three typical bisphenol compounds (BPA, BPS, TBBPA) at environmentally relevant doses.MethodsThe adult zebrafish were randomly divided into solvent control group (DMSO) and AhR inhibitor CH223191 (CH) group (0.05 μmol/L), bisphenol exposure groups (10, 100, 1000 nmol/L) and combined exposure groups (0.05 μmol/L CH and 1000 nmol/L bisphenol compounds). Each tank contained 8 fish (4 male and 4 female), and two parallel tanks were set synchronously. After 30 days of exposure, zebrafish were put on ice plate for anesthesia, weighed and measured for body length, and dissected for brain tissue. The gene expression was detected by RT-qPCR, and the activities of antioxidant enzymes were detected by commercial kits. SPSS 26.0 was used to analyze the data. Additionally, GO, KEGG and principal component analysis (PCA) were carried out.ResultsCompared with the solvent control group, there were no significant differences in body weight and length among the exposed groups. In general, exposure to bisphenol compounds could affect the expression of Ahr2 and AhR target genes (cyp1a1, cyp1a2, and cyp1c1), key genes of neural function (elavl3, gfap, mbp, syn2a, gap43, Zn5, shha, and ache), oxidative stress related genes (nrf2, gpx1a, gstp1/gstp1.2, gstp2/gstp1.1, sod1, sod2, and cat), and the activities of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, CAT and GSH-Px/GPX) in zebrafish brain tissue to some extent. Compared with the groups exposed to bisphenols alone, CH could antagonize the above interference effects caused by bisphenols to some extent. Therefore, the toxic effects of BPA, BPS and TBBPA might be produced through similar mechanisms.ConclusionEnvironmentally related doses of bisphenols (BPA, BPS, TBBPA) could disturb the expression of key molecules of oxidative stress and neural function through activating the AhR signaling pathway, and ultimately lead to neurotoxicity.

Dataset Information

Cytotoxic and apoptotic data of BPA and BPA alternatives TMBPF, BPAF, and BPS in female adult rat and human stem cells.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets