Dataset Information

Comprehensive Analysis and Identification of Key Driver Genes for Distinguishing Between Esophageal Adenocarcinoma and Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

ABSTRACT: Background: Esophageal cancer (EC) is one of the deadliest cancers in the world. However, the mechanism that drives the evolution of EC is still unclear. On this basis, we identified the key genes and molecular pathways that may be related to the progression of esophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma to find potential markers or therapeutic targets. Methods: GSE26886 were obtained from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) among normal samples, EA, and squamous cell carcinoma were determined using R software. Then, potential functions of DEGs were determined using the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID). The STRING software was used to identify the most important modules in the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network. The expression levels of hub genes were confirmed using UALCAN database. Kaplan-Meier plotters were used to confirm the correlation between hub genes and outcomes in EC. Results: In this study, we identified 1,098 genes induced in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), and 669 genes were reduced in EA and ESCC, suggesting that these genes may play an important role in the occurrence and development of EC tumors. Bioinformatics analysis showed that these genes were involved in cell cycle regulation and p53 and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt signaling pathway. In addition, we identified 147 induced genes and 130 reduced genes differentially expressed in EA and ESCC. The expression of ESCC in the EA group was different from that in the control group. By PPI network analysis, we identified 10 hub genes, including GNAQ, RGS5, MAPK1, ATP1B1, HADHA, HSDL2, SLC25A20, ACOX1, SCP2, and NLN. TCGA validation showed that these genes were present in the dysfunctional samples between EC and normal samples and between EA and ESCC. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that MAPK1, ACOX1, SCP2, and NLN were associated with overall survival in patients with ESCC and EA. Conclusions: In this study, we identified a series of DEGs between EC and normal samples and between EA and ESCC samples. We also identified 10 key genes involved in the EC process. We believe that this study may provide a new biomarker for the prognosis of EA and ESCC.

SUBMITTER: Wang F

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8194272 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:The aim of the present study was to identify the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in esophageal squamous-cellcarcinoma (ESCC) and provide potential therapeutic targets. The microarray dataset GSE20347 was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, and included 17 tissue samples and 13 normal adjacent tissue samples from patients with ESCC. A total of 22,277 DEGs were identified. A heat map for the DEGs was constructed with the Morpheus online tool and the top 200 genes (100 upregulated and 100 downregulated) were selected for further bioinformatics analysis, including analysis of gene ontology (GO) terms, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways, protein-protein interaction networks and Spearman's correlation tests. The results of the GO analysis indicated that the upregulated DEGs were most significantly enriched in membrane-bounded vesicles in the cellular component (CC) category, but were not significantly enriched in any GO terms of the categories biological process (BP) or molecular function (MF); furthermore, the downregulated DEGs were most significantly enriched in regulation of DNA metabolic processes, nucleotide binding and chromosomes in the categories BP, MF and CC, respectively. The KEGG analysis indicated that the downregulated DEGs were enriched in the regulation of cell cycle pathways. The top 10 hub proteins in the protein-protein interaction network were cyclin-dependent kinase 4, budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles 1, cyclin B2, heat shock protein 90AA1, aurora kinase A, H2A histone family member Z, replication factor C subunit 4, and minichromosome maintenance complex component 2, -4 and -7. These proteins are mainly involved in regulating tumor progression. The genes in the four top modules were mainly implicated in regulating cell cycle pathways. Secreted Ly-6/uPAR-related protein (SLURP) was the hub gene, and SLURP and its interacting genes were most enriched in the chromosomal part in the CC category, organelle organization in the BP category and protein binding in the MF category, and were involved in pathways including DNA replication, cell cycle and P53 signaling. The expression of SLURP-1 in fifteen patients with esophageal carcinoma was detected using quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis, and the results indicated that SLURP-1 expression was significantly decreased in the tumor samples relative to that in normal adjacent tissues. These results suggest that several hub proteins and the hub gene SLURP-1 may serve as potential therapeutic targets, and that gene dysfunction may be involved in the tumorigenesis of ESCC.

Project description:BackgroundEsophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) as the main subtype of esophageal cancer (EC) is a leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Despite advances in early diagnosis and clinical management, the long-term survival of ESCC patients remains disappointing, due to a lack of full understanding of the molecular mechanisms.MethodsIn order to identify the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in ESCC, the microarray datasets GSE20347 and GSE26886 from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database were analyzed. The enrichment analyses of gene ontology (GO) terms, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) were performed for the DEGs. The protein-protein interaction (PPI) network of these DEGs was constructed using the Cytoscape software based on the STRING database to select as hub genes for weighted co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) with ESCC samples from TCGA database.ResultsA total of 746 DEGs were commonly shared in the two datasets including 286 upregulated genes and 460 downregulated genes in ESCC. The DEGs were enriched in biological processes such as extracellular matrix organization, proliferation and keratinocyte differentiation, and were enriched in biological pathways such as ECM-receptor interaction and cell cycle. GSEA analysis also indicated the enrichment of upregulated DEGs in cell cycle. The 40 DEGs were selected as hub genes. The MEblack module was found to be enriched in the cell cycle, Spliceosome, DNA replication and Oocyte meiosis. Among the hub genes correlated with MEblack module, GSEA analysis indicated that DEGs of TCGA samples with DLGAP5 upregulation was enriched in cell cycle. Moreover, the highly endogenous expression of DLGAP5 was confirmed in ESCC cells. DLGAP5 knockdown significantly inhibited the proliferation of ESCC cells.ConclusionsDEGs and hub genes such as DLGAP5 from independent datasets in the current study will provide clues to elucidate the molecular mechanisms involved in development and progression of ESCC.

Project description:Background Esophageal cancer (EC) is a highly aggressive malignancy that is classified as esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Infiltrating stromal/immune cells, a major component of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), have prognostic significance in various cancers. Methods In this study we investigated genes and immune factors in the tumor microenvironment (TME) of ESCC and EAC that can serve as prognostic biomarkers. Stromal and immune scores were calculated using the Estimation of Stromal and Immune Cells in Malignant Tumor Tissues Using Expression Data (ESTIMATE) algorithm based on gene expression profiles of patient-derived tumor tissues in The Cancer Genome Atlas database. The correlation between ESTIMATE scores and survival rates in EC were analyzed. A comparison of high and low stromal/immune score groups revealed multiple differentially expressed genes (DEGs) as candidate prognostic genes; their role in immune-related biological processes was evaluated by functional and protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analyses, and the genes were validated using Gene Expression Omnibus datasets. Additionally, 22 tumor-infiltrating immune cell (TIIC) subsets were analyzed using the CIBERSORT algorithm. Results Median stromal score was higher whereas immune score was lower in ESCC than in EAC (both P<0.01). Stromal score was lower in female as compared to male ESCC patients (P<0.05), and was significantly correlated with T stage (P<0.05). In EAC, median immune score was higher in female as compared to male patients (P<0.05) and was correlated with tumor-node-metastasis stage (P<0.05). The identified DEGs were mainly involved in lymphocyte (especially T-lymphocyte) activation and carbohydrate binding. Moreover, the levels of infiltrating resting-stage dendritic cells, CD8+ T cells, naïve B cells, activated mast cells, and resting memory CD4+ T cells were significantly correlated with EC prognosis (P<0.05). Conclusions The immune microenvironment of ESCC and EAC are quite different. We have found genes with prognostic value in multiple tumor databases.

Dataset Information

Comprehensive Analysis and Identification of Key Driver Genes for Distinguishing Between Esophageal Adenocarcinoma and Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets