Dataset Information

Novel Glutamatergic Modulators for the Treatment of Mood Disorders: Current Status.

ABSTRACT: The efficacy of standard antidepressants is limited for many patients with mood disorders such as major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar depression, underscoring the urgent need to develop novel therapeutics. Both clinical and preclinical studies have implicated glutamatergic system dysfunction in the pathophysiology of mood disorders. In particular, rapid reductions in depressive symptoms have been observed in response to subanesthetic doses of the glutamatergic modulator racemic (R,S)-ketamine in individuals with mood disorders. These results have prompted investigation into other glutamatergic modulators for depression, both as monotherapy and adjunctively. Several glutamate receptor-modulating agents have been tested in proof-of-concept studies for mood disorders. This manuscript gives a brief overview of the glutamate system and its relevance to rapid antidepressant response and discusses the existing clinical evidence for glutamate receptor-modulating agents, including (1) broad glutamatergic modulators ((R,S)-ketamine, esketamine, (R)-ketamine, (2R,6R)-hydroxynorketamine [HNK], dextromethorphan, Nuedexta [a combination of dextromethorphan and quinidine], deudextromethorphan [AVP-786], axsome [AXS-05], dextromethadone [REL-1017], nitrous oxide, AZD6765, CLE100, AGN-241751); (2) glycine site modulators (D-cycloserine [DCS], NRX-101, rapastinel [GLYX-13], apimostinel [NRX-1074], sarcosine, 4-chlorokynurenine [4-Cl-KYN/AV-101]); (3) subunit (NR2B)-specific N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists (eliprodil [EVT-101], traxoprodil [CP-101,606], rislenemdaz [MK-0657/CERC-301]); (4) metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR) modulators (basimglurant, AZD2066, RG1578, TS-161); and (5) mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) activators (NV-5138). Many of these agents are still in the preliminary stages of development. Furthermore, to date, most have demonstrated relatively modest effects compared with (R,S)-ketamine and esketamine, though some have shown more favorable characteristics. Of these novel agents, the most promising, and the ones for which the most evidence exists, appear to be those targeting ionotropic glutamate receptors.

SUBMITTER: Henter ID

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8201267 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Aims The aim of this proof-of-concept study was to understand the effect of daily intake of a 14-strain probiotic on mood, reward learning and emotional and cognitive processing in adults with low mood in the absence of prescribed medication. Salivary cortisol was measured as a marker for physiological stress. Methods In this parallel-group double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 80 healthy adults with self-identified low mood were randomised to receive either the 14-strain probiotic or placebo for a duration of 4 weeks. Data were collected from participants at baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 4). Results Probiotic intake significantly reduced depression scores (by 50%) compared to baseline, as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scale (p < 0.05). Analysis of individual items in the PHQ-9 revealed that participants taking probiotics reported improved concentration relative to baseline (+ 51%, p < 0.05) and felt less tired compared to placebo (−21%, p < 0.01). Regarding emotional processing, the probiotic group was more accurate at recognising facial expressions compared to those receiving placebo (facial emotion recognition test, +12%, p < 0.05). Furthermore, the probiotic group performed less well at the reward learning task relative to the placebo group (probabilistic instrumental learning task, p < 0.05) and was less vigilant to emotional cues compared neutral cues (dot-probe unmasked test, −8%, P < 0.05). The probiotic group also showed increased susceptibility to emotional interference during a cognitive learning task, relative to placebo (auditory visual learning task, −18% p < 0.05). The study also revealed a downward trend in salivary cortisol in the probiotic group over 4 weeks. Together, these results suggest that probiotics may work via a different psychological mechanism to that of conventional antidepressants. In other words, probiotics may work by reducing emotional salience across all emotions whereas conventional antidepressants are thought to work by increasing bias to positive emotional cues and decreasing bias to negative ones. Conclusion These data suggest that intake of Bio-Kult® Advanced has an effect on mood and that this is achieved in ways distinct from the effects of pharmacological antidepressants. While more research is needed, these results suggest that certain probiotics could form part of an ‘early intervention’ strategy for people experiencing low mood. A second randomised controlled trial (currently recruiting) will provide data on this intervention in patients with a formal diagnosis of depression undergoing concurrent pharmacological treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03801655

Dataset Information

Novel Glutamatergic Modulators for the Treatment of Mood Disorders: Current Status.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets