Dataset Information

Training and Validation of Deep Learning-Based Auto-Segmentation Models for Lung Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy Using Retrospective Radiotherapy Planning Contours.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

Deep learning-based auto-segmented contour (DC) models require high quality data for their development, and previous studies have typically used prospectively produced contours, which can be resource intensive and time consuming to obtain. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using retrospective peer-reviewed radiotherapy planning contours in the training and evaluation of DC models for lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR).

Methods

Using commercial deep learning-based auto-segmentation software, DC models for lung SABR organs at risk (OAR) and gross tumor volume (GTV) were trained using a deep convolutional neural network and a median of 105 contours per structure model obtained from 160 publicly available CT scans and 50 peer-reviewed SABR planning 4D-CT scans from center A. DCs were generated for 50 additional planning CT scans from center A and 50 from center B, and compared with the clinical contours (CC) using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and 95% Hausdorff distance (HD).

Results

Comparing DCs to CCs, the mean DSC and 95% HD were 0.93 and 2.85mm for aorta, 0.81 and 3.32mm for esophagus, 0.95 and 5.09mm for heart, 0.98 and 2.99mm for bilateral lung, 0.52 and 7.08mm for bilateral brachial plexus, 0.82 and 4.23mm for proximal bronchial tree, 0.90 and 1.62mm for spinal cord, 0.91 and 2.27mm for trachea, and 0.71 and 5.23mm for GTV. DC to CC comparisons of center A and center B were similar for all OAR structures.

Conclusions

The DCs developed with retrospective peer-reviewed treatment contours approximated CCs for the majority of OARs, including on an external dataset. DCs for structures with more variability tended to be less accurate and likely require using a larger number of training cases or novel training approaches to improve performance. Developing DC models from existing radiotherapy planning contours appears feasible and warrants further clinical workflow testing.

SUBMITTER: Wong J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8215371 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Since intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has become popular for the treatment of gynecologic cancers, the contouring process has become more critical. This study evaluated the feasibility of atlas-based auto-segmentation (ABAS) for contouring in patients with endometrial and cervical cancers. METHODS:A total of 75 sets of planning CT images from 75 patients were collected. Contours for the pelvic nodal clinical target volume (CTV), femur, and bladder were carefully generated by two skilled radiation oncologists. Of 75 patients, 60 were randomly registered in three different atlas libraries for ABAS in groups of 20, 40, or 60. ABAS was conducted in 15 patients, followed by manual correction (ABASc). The time required to generate all contours was recorded, and the accuracy of segmentation was assessed using Dice's coefficient (DC) and the Hausdorff distance (HD) and compared to those of manually delineated contours. RESULTS:For ABAS-CTV, the best results were achieved with groups of 60 patients (DC, 0.79; HD, 19.7?mm) and the worst results with groups of 20 patients (DC, 0.75; p?=?0.012; HD, 21.3?mm; p?=?0.002). ABASc-CTV performed better than ABAS-CTV in terms of both HD and DC (ABASc [n?=?60]; DC, 0.84; HD, 15.6?mm; all p?<?0.017). ABAS required an average of 45.1?s, whereas ABASc required 191.1?s; both methods required less time than the manual methods (p?<?0.001). Both ABAS-Femur and simultaneous ABAS-Bilateral-femurs showed satisfactory performance, regardless of the atlas library used (DC >?0.9 and HD ?10.0?mm), with significant time reduction compared to that needed for manual delineation (p?<?0.001). However, ABAS-Bladder did not prove to be feasible, with inferior results regardless of library size (DC?<?0.6 and HD?>?40?mm). Furthermore, ABASc-Bladder required a longer processing time than manual contouring to achieve the same accuracy. CONCLUSIONS:ABAS could help physicians to delineate the CTV and organs-at-risk (e.g., femurs) in IMRT planning considering its consistency, efficacy, and accuracy.

Project description:Prostate is the most common non-cutaneous cancer diagnosed among men in North America. Fortunately most prostate cancers are screen detected and non-metastatic on diagnosis. Treatment options for men with localized prostate cancer include surgery ± postoperative radiation or radiation ± androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Brachytherapy ± external beam radiation treatment (EBRT) appears to have superior long-term disease control over EBRT alone likely because of higher biologic effective dose delivered. Stereotactic ablative body radiation (SABR) is a novel, non-invasive, high-precision EBRT technique that allows safe delivery of biologic doses similar to brachytherapy with similar or lower side effects [measured using toxicity or quality of life (QOL) scales]. Efficacy for SABR appears to be similar to brachytherapy including positive biopsy rates 2-3 years post treatment, biochemical failure (BF) rates out to 10-year and incidence of metastases. SABR dose escalation reduces biopsy positivity and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadirs but increases genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity-no effect on BF has been realized yet. The overall treatment time (OTT) varies in many protocols. Phase 2 randomized data shows that QOL is better in the acute setting with a weekly course of treatment compared to an every other day treatment regimen with no difference in late setting. Follow-up data are immature and likely underpowered to determine efficacy differences. SABR is cheaper and uses less resource than any other radiation technique. Given the healthcare resource challenges (including financial resources), SABR would be a welcomed addition if studies show non-inferiority to other radiation techniques. For patients with de novo or metastatic disease on relapse, there is much enthusiasm regarding the use of SABR in the setting of oligometastatic prostate cancer. SABR appears to be feasible to deliver, well tolerated and may delay the next line of therapy. However, until adequately powered randomized studies confirm a benefit, such an approach cannot be considered standard of care treatment at this time. Enrollment of eligible prostate cancer patients onto SABR clinical trials should be encouraged.

Project description:PurposeAutomatic segmentation offers many benefits for radiotherapy treatment planning; however, the lack of publicly available benchmark datasets limits the clinical use of automatic segmentation. In this work, we present a well-curated computed tomography (CT) dataset of high-quality manually drawn contours from patients with thoracic cancer that can be used to evaluate the accuracy of thoracic normal tissue auto-segmentation systems.Acquisition and validation methodsComputed tomography scans of 60 patients undergoing treatment simulation for thoracic radiotherapy were acquired from three institutions: MD Anderson Cancer Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the MAASTRO clinic. Each institution provided CT scans from 20 patients, including mean intensity projection four-dimensional CT (4D CT), exhale phase (4D CT), or free-breathing CT scans depending on their clinical practice. All CT scans covered the entire thoracic region with a 50-cm field of view and slice spacing of 1, 2.5, or 3 mm. Manual contours of left/right lungs, esophagus, heart, and spinal cord were retrieved from the clinical treatment plans. These contours were checked for quality and edited if necessary to ensure adherence to RTOG 1106 contouring guidelines.Data format and usage notesThe CT images and RTSTRUCT files are available in DICOM format. The regions of interest were named according to the nomenclature recommended by American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 263 as Lung_L, Lung_R, Esophagus, Heart, and SpinalCord. This dataset is available on The Cancer Imaging Archive (funded by the National Cancer Institute) under Lung CT Segmentation Challenge 2017 (http://doi.org/10.7937/K9/TCIA.2017.3r3fvz08).Potential applicationsThis dataset provides CT scans with well-delineated manually drawn contours from patients with thoracic cancer that can be used to evaluate auto-segmentation systems. Additional anatomies could be supplied in the future to enhance the existing library of contours.