The Development of a Video Intervention to Improve Senior Medical Students' Performance on Outpatient Telephone Encounters: a Delphi Analysis and Randomized Controlled Trial.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Introduction
Postgraduate trainees address outpatient telephone calls (OTCs) with little prior training. This study determines the skills necessary for OTCs and examines whether a video intervention improves medical students' performance on simulated OTCs.Materials and methods
We utilized a Delphi technique to determine skills needed for OTCs and created a 9-min video teaching these skills. Senior medical students were randomized to Intervention (viewed video) and Control (did not view video) groups. Students were assessed pre-/post-intervention on simulated OTCs. The primary outcome was the between-group difference in improvement.Results
The Delphi yielded 34 important skills with the highest focus on communication (n = 13) and triage (n = 6). Seventy-two students completed assessments (Control, n = 41; Intervention, n = 31). The score (mean ± SD) improved 4.3% in the Control group (62.3 ± 14.3% to 66.6 ± 25.0%) and 12.2% in the Intervention group (60.7 ± 15.2% to 72.9 ± 20.4%, p = 0.15). The effect size measured by Cohen's d was 0.55, considered effective (> 0.33) for an educational intervention.Conclusions
This project fills a gap in OTC training. The use of the Delphi technique, intervention development based on the results, and evaluation of efficacy is a process that could be reproduced for other educational gaps.Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-021-01331-w.
SUBMITTER: Mack JA
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8216674 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:IntroductionResidents have the important task of updating family members of hospitalized patients, often by telephone. There are limited curricula dedicated to preparing medical students for this task, which will become their responsibility as residents.MethodsWe created a virtual workshop, including four patient cases, to facilitate teaching senior medical students enrolled in an internal medicine residency preparation course. Students alternated role-playing either physician or family member. We assessed performance using a self-assessment rubric before (preworkshop) and after (postworkshop) a didactic session. We compared pre- and postworkshop scores using t tests. We also used a retrospective pre-post survey with a 5-point Likert scale to assess each participant's comfort level, knowledge, and perceived ability.ResultsThirty-nine students completed the pre- and postworkshop evaluation (response rate: 70%). The mean score on the preworkshop self-assessment was 83% (SD = 9%) and on the postworkshop self-assessment was 94% (SD = 8%; p < .01), with a large effect size of 1.22. Among the 31 students (62%) who completed the survey, there was improvement in comfort level (2.9 vs. 3.7, p < .001), knowledge (2.7 vs. 3.8, p < .001), and perceived ability (2.9 vs. 3.7, p < .001).DiscussionOur workshop was effective in teaching medical students a structured format for providing telephone updates and was well received. The workshop was also effective when delivered virtually (with videos off) to mimic the non-face-to-face communication that occurs when delivering family updates by telephone. The curriculum could be expanded to other learner groups.
| S-EPMC9120304 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Objectives:To gain insight into factors affecting career preference and career choice during the final phase of medical school, above and beyond a model that was presented by Bland and colleagues in 1995 (the "Bland model"). Methods:A qualitative study was conducted. One-hour semi-structured interviews were conducted with final-year medical students about career preference and the factors influencing preference and choice. The interviews were transcribed and a thematic analysis was applied, to identify patterns and interrelationships in the data and to compare and contrast these with the Bland model. Results:Twenty-four students participated. Three critical sets of factors, not present in the Bland model, emerged from the interviews: (a) factors arising from student-initiated information collection, (b) patient population characteristics of a specialty domain, and (c) the characteristics of teams and colleagues within a specialty. Conclusions:Students appear to actively match and calibrate perceptions of different specialty characteristics with their current personal needs and expected future needs, and to include cues from self-initiated information collection about a speciality. This agency aligns with Billett's workplace learning theory. Next, specialty patient population features appear to be taken into account; this was not unexpected but not included in the Bland model. Finally, the characteristics of teams and colleagues of a specialty were stressed in the interviews. These three components broaden the applicability of the Bland model--originally created for primary-care careers--to medical specialties in general.
| S-EPMC6387763 | biostudies-other
Project description:IntroductionCross-cover, the process by which a nonprimary team physician cares for patients, usually during afternoons, evenings, and weekends, is common in academic medical centers. With the advent of residency duty-hour restrictions, cross-cover care has increased, making education in effective cross-coverage an urgent need.MethodsWe implemented a cross-cover didactic activity composed of 18 interactive cases with 29 senior medical students enrolled in an internal medicine residency preparation course. The curriculum was facilitated by one faculty member and one senior medical resident and utilized think-pair-share learning techniques to discuss an approach to a range of common (both urgent and routine) cross-cover scenarios. We analyzed confidence and feelings of preparedness pre- and postintervention. We also examined differences in medical knowledge based on two multiple-choice written cross-cover cases that addressed both medical management and triage.ResultsThis curriculum significantly improved feelings of confidence (from 1.8 to 3.2, p < .0001), reduced anxiety (from 4.5 to 4.1, p < .03), and improved performance in clinical case scenarios (from 82% to 89%, p < .02).DiscussionThis curriculum covered not only the important medical aspects of cross-cover care (e.g., diagnostics and management) but also equally important roles of cross-cover, such as how to effectively triage cross-cover scenarios. The curriculum was well received by students.
| S-EPMC7431185 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionObjective standardized teaching exercises (OSTEs) are widely used to develop professional competencies, especially in the health care professions. An OSTE involves exposing different providers to the same, time-limited scenario that is concurrently observed and/or recorded for either formative or summative evaluation. As there are limited resources available for creating a resident-specific OSTE, especially those applicable to family and community medicine residents, we created and evaluated a resident OSTE (R-OSTE) for second- and third-year family and community medicine residents.MethodsThis R-OSTE involved two cases. The first featured Taylor, a third-year medical student resistant to feedback. The second featured Kris, a first-year resident nervous about approaching the attending on duty. Our R-OSTE had residents teaching interpersonal skills to trained actors in a standardized learner role.ResultsResidents in the teaching role were formatively evaluated by peer observers (fellow residents) and standardized learners on interpersonal domains such as communication and professionalism. Learners gave residents an average performance rating of 4.9 on a 1 to 6 scale with 1 = Very Poor and 6 = Excellent. Residents also evaluated the OSTE itself, rating their experience on multiple teaching-related statements. Eighty-six percent of residents agreed this exercise was an appropriate development activity for family medicine residents. Overall, our R-OSTE was rated highly for relevance to teaching by the residents.DiscussionThe residents were rated highly by both peer observers and standardized learners. However, there was little variability in peer observer scores, indicating the need for an alternative method of measurement.
| S-EPMC6338149 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundEmergency departments (EDs) offer a variety of learning opportunities for undergraduate medical students. It is however, difficult to evaluate whether they are receiving recommended training during their emergency medicine (EM) clerkship without identifying their clinical activities. We aimed to evaluate the clinical exposure of the final year medical students at our College during their EM clerkship.MethodsThis is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected student logbooks. 75 students rotated in a 4-week EM clerkship during 2015-2016. The students rotated in EDs of two hospitals. Each ED treats more than 120,000 cases annually. The students completed 12 eight-hours shifts. Presentations and procedures seen were compared with EM curriculum recommendations.ResultsFive thousand one hundred twenty-two patient presentations and 3246 procedures were recorded in the logbooks, an average (SD) of 68.3 (17.6) patients and 46.1 (14.0) procedures. None of the students encountered all ten recommended presentations. Two students (2.6%) logged all nine procedure categories of the EM curriculum.ConclusionRecommended presentations and procedures of the EM clerkship were not fully encountered by all our students. Different settings vary in the availability and type of patients and procedures. Each clinical clerkship should tailor their teaching methods based on the available learning opportunities.
| S-EPMC5756377 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background Perceived stress, burnout, and poor sleep quality are high among medical students. Interventions designed to target these issues are necessary to promote the health and well-being of medical students. The purpose of this study was twofold: 1) to assess the feasibility of implementing a sunrise alarm clock intervention with medical students and 2) to evaluate the impact of the intervention on perceived stress, burnout scores, and sleep quality. Methods We conducted a feasibility study to evaluate the efficacy of a two-week, sunrise alarm clock intervention in combination with electronic device removal at bedtime. We assessed first- and second-year medical students’ perceived stress, burnout scores, including Emotional Exhaustion, Depersonalization, and Low Sense of Personal Achievement, and sleep quality before and after the intervention. In addition, we measured smartphone addiction prior to the intervention. Results A total of 57 students consented to participate, of which 55 completed both the pre- and post-assessments (3.5% attrition). The mean age of the participants was 24.8?±?1.9?years, 50.9% (n =?29) identified as women, and 68.4% (n =?39) identified as white. Pre-intervention, 42.1% (n =?24) of students met criteria for smartphone addiction and 77.2% (n =?44) met criteria for poor sleep quality. In addition, 22.8% (n =?13) of participants had high emotional exhaustion, 64.9% (n =?31) high depersonalization, and 42.1% (n =?24) low sense of personal accomplishment prior to the intervention. Following the two-week intervention, participants showed improvements in emotional exhaustion (p =?0.001, Cohen’s d?=?0.353), depersonalization (p?=?0.001, Cohen’s d?=?0.411) low sense of personal accomplishment (p =?0.023, Cohen’s d?=?0.275), perceived stress (p <?.001, Cohen’s d?=?.334), and sleep quality (p <?0.001, Cohen’s d?=?0.925). The number of participants who reported poor sleep quality decreased to 41.8% (n =?23), demonstrating a significant decline (p =?0.026). Participants also improved subjective sleep quality (p <?0.001, Cohen’s d?=?1.033), sleep duration (p =?0.001, Cohen’s d?=?0.431), sleep latency (p?<?0.001, Cohen’s d?=?0.433), and sleep efficiency (p =?0.021, Cohen’s d?=?0.673). Conclusions These findings suggest that the two-week sunrise alarm clock protocol with electronic device removal was effective in improving sleep quality and reducing burnout scores, and perceived stress. However, additional research comparing this intervention to a proper control group is needed to draw meaningful conclusions about the effectiveness of this intervention.
| S-EPMC7539390 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundShared decision-making, in which physicians and patients openly explore beliefs, exchange information, and reach explicit closure, may represent optimal physician-patient communication. There are currently no universally accepted methods to assess medical students' competence in shared decision-making.ObjectiveTo characterize medical students' shared decision-making with standardized patients (SPs) and determine if students' use of shared decision-making correlates with SP ratings of their communication.DesignRetrospective study of medical students' performance with four SPs.ParticipantsSixty fourth-year medical students.MeasurementsObjective blinded coding of shared decision-making quantified as decision moments (exploration/articulation of perspective, information sharing, explicit closure for a particular decision); SP scoring of communication skills using a validated checklist.ResultsOf 779 decision moments generated in 240 encounters, 312 (40%) met criteria for shared decision-making. All students engaged in shared decision-making in at least two of the four cases, although in two cases 5% and 12% of students engaged in no shared decision-making. The most commonly discussed decision moment topics were medications (n?=?98, 31%), follow-up visits (71, 23%), and diagnostic testing (44, 14%). Correlations between the number of decision moments in a case and students' communication scores were low (rho?=?0.07 to 0.37).ConclusionsAlthough all students engaged in some shared decision-making, particularly regarding medical interventions, there was no correlation between shared decision-making and overall communication competence rated by the SPs. These findings suggest that SP ratings of students' communication skill cannot be used to infer students' use of shared decision-making. Tools to determine students' skill in shared decision-making are needed.
| S-EPMC3055961 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major public health problem in India. We surveyed medical students to assess their knowledge, attitudes, and factors associated with confidence in antibiotic prescribing intent. In this cross-sectional study, a convenience sample of 356 students were surveyed in July-August 2017 on AMR-related knowledge, attitudes, information sources and antimicrobial training. Antimicrobial resistance knowledge and attitude scores were calculated. Bivariate analysis using the chi-square test of independence and multivariate binary logistic regression analysis were used to investigate factors associated with confidence in antibiotic prescribing intent. A total of 347 students completed the survey; 64% agreed that strong knowledge of antibiotics is important in their medical careers; 61% stated that they would like more education regarding appropriate use of antibiotics. The mean total knowledge score was 11.5 out of 31 (SD = 3.4), and the mean attitude score was 6.0 out of 16 (SD = 4.2). Although 13% of students were "very familiar"/"familiar" with the term "antimicrobial stewardship," only 35% of students felt "very confident" or "confident" in antimicrobial prescribing to patients in the future. On multivariate analysis, female gender, clinical vignette antimicrobial knowledge scores, positive attitude scores, awareness of Infection Control Policy, and > 3 years of antimicrobial prescribing clinical training were predictors of confidence in antimicrobial prescribing. A higher attitude score was independently associated with decreased confidence in antimicrobial prescribing intent. There is a need to improve education regarding AMR in the curriculum, and increase awareness of infection control policies and antimicrobial stewardship program in clinical settings.
| S-EPMC7695085 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundTraining for the fundus examination using traditional teaching is challenging, resulting in low generalist physicians' confidence in performing the funduscopic examination. There is growing evidence suggesting a flexible e-learning video approach's value in teaching physical examination procedures. However, whether the flexible e-learning video approach is superior to the traditional, face-to-face (F2F) lecture-based teaching for the funduscopic exam and the cognitive processes supporting its effectiveness has not yet been determined.MethodsWe conducted a sequential explanatory mixed-method study to compare the flexible e-learning video approach's effectiveness versus the F2F lecture-based approach for teaching the funduscopic exam to medical students at Chiba University in Japan. Medical students were randomly assigned to either a flexible e-learning video approach group or a F2F lecture approach group. We then quantitatively measured the diagnostic accuracy of funduscopic findings before and after attending the specific classrooms. Next, we conducted student focus groups to explore the students' thinking processes in the flexible e-learning video approach vs. the F2F lecture-based teaching of fundus examination. The qualitative data were analyzed using the qualitative content analysis method.ResultsThe mean diagnostic accuracy scores in the post-test significantly increased from pre-test in the intervention group (36.6 to 63.4%, p < 0.001). Post-post comparisons across the two groups revealed a significant difference (intervention group 63.4% vs. control group 34.6%, p < 0.001). Six semi-structured focused group interviews were conducted (n = 36). In the flexible e-learning video approach group, we identified ten categories corresponding to four levels of the revised Bloom's taxonomy: remember, understand, apply, analyze. Five categories were identified in the traditional F2F lecture approach group corresponding to three revised Bloom's taxonomy levels: understand, apply, analyze. Interrater reliability was substantial (Cohen's kappa = 0.81).ConclusionsTeaching medical students funduscopic examination using the flexible e-learning video approach leads to improved diagnostic accuracy of funduscopic examinations. The flexible e-learning video teaching method enabled higher cognitive activity levels than the traditional, lecture-based classroom, as assessed using the revised Bloom's taxonomy.Trial registrationThis study was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry on 08/02/2020 (Unique trial number: UMIN 000039434 ).
| S-EPMC8364022 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT) presented various challenges as the Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences (OSU-CHS) campus closed to students in response to COVID-19 mitigation efforts in late March 2020. While some classes transitioned easily to virtual platforms already in place, such as learning management systems and the lecture recording software, other classes that involved coordinated group activities did not have as many suitable alternatives. One College of Osteopathic Medicine (COM) class utilized the teleconferencing tool Zoom. Zoom's breakout rooms and waiting room features were used to facilitate a clinical interviewing skills lab and telemedicine-type encounter with standardized patients. We were able to successfully designate groups of approximately 10 students into three rooms, amongst which the standardized patients moved at set intervals. Faculty facilitators participated in each room to guide students, and one support staff member served as host to manage the technical aspects of the overall meeting. We found this approach to be a successful alternative to live group activities and a worthwhile opportunity to expose preclerkship students to telemedicine.
| S-EPMC7556762 | biostudies-literature