Project description:Light chain (AL) amyloidosis is caused by a small B-cell clone producing light chains that form amyloid deposits and cause organ dysfunction. Chemotherapy aims at suppressing the production of the toxic light chain (LC) and restore organ function. However, even complete hematologic response (CR), defined as negative serum and urine immunofixation and normalized free LC ratio, does not always translate into organ response. Next-generation flow (NGF) cytometry is used to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) in multiple myeloma. We evaluated MRD by NGF in 92 AL amyloidosis patients in CR. Fifty-four percent had persistent MRD (median 0.03% abnormal plasma cells). There were no differences in baseline clinical variables in patients with or without detectable MRD. Undetectable MRD was associated with higher rates of renal (90% vs 62%, p = 0.006) and cardiac response (95% vs 75%, p = 0.023). Hematologic progression was more frequent in MRD positive (0 vs 25% at 1 year, p = 0.001). Altogether, NGF can detect MRD in approximately half the AL amyloidosis patients in CR, and persistent MRD can explain persistent organ dysfunction. Thus, this study supports testing MRD in CR patients, especially if not accompanied by organ response. In case MRD persists, further treatment could be considered, carefully balancing residual organ damage, patient frailty, and possible toxicity.
Project description:Detection of minimal residual disease predicts adverse outcome in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Currently, minimal residual disease may be detected by RQ-PCR or flow cytometry, both of which have practical and diagnostic limitations. Here, we describe a next-generation sequencing assay for minimal residual disease detection in NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia, which encompasses ?60% of patients with normal karyotype acute myeloid leukemia. Exon 12 of NPM1 was PCR amplified using sequencing adaptor-linked primers and deep sequenced to enable detection of low-prevalence, acute myeloid leukemia-specific activating mutations. We benchmarked our results against flow cytometry, the standard of care for acute myeloid leukemia minimal residual disease diagnosis at our institution. The performance of both approaches was evaluated using defined dilutions of an NPM1 mutation-positive cell line and longitudinal clinical samples from acute myeloid leukemia patients. Using defined control material, we found this assay sensitive to approximately 0.001% mutant cells, outperforming flow cytometry by an order of magnitude. Next-generation sequencing was precise and semiquantitative over four orders of magnitude. In 22 longitudinal samples from six acute myeloid leukemia patients, next-generation sequencing detected minimal residual disease in all samples deemed negative by flow cytometry. Further, in one-third of patients, sequencing detected alternate NPM1 mutations in addition to the patient's index mutation, consistent with tumor heterogeneity. Next-generation sequencing provides information without prior knowledge of NPM1 mutation subtype or validation of allele-specific probes as required for RQ-PCR assays, and without generation and interpretation of complex multidimensional flow cytometry data. This approach may complement current technologies to enhance patient-specific clinical decision-making.
Project description:PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in minimal-residual-disease (MRD) monitoring in Chinese patients with multiple myeloma (MM).MethodsThis study analyzed 60 Chinese MM patients. During MRD monitoring in these patients' post-therapy, clonal immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGH) rearrangements were detected via NGS using LymphoTrack assays. MRD monitoring was performed using NGS or next-generation flow cytometry (NGF), and the results were compared. Additionally, the sensitivity and reproducibility of the NGS method were assessed.ResultsThe MRD detection range of the NGS method was 10-6-10-1, which suggested good linearity, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.985 and a limit of detection of 10-6. Intra- and inter-assay reproducibility analyses showed that NGS exhibited 100% reproducibility with low variability in clonal cells. At diagnosis, unique clones were found in 42 patients (70.0%) with clonal IGH rearrangements, which were used as clonality markers for MRD monitoring post-therapy. Comparison of NGS and NGF for MRD monitoring showed 79.1% concordance. No samples that tested MRD-positive via NGF were found negative via NGS, indicating the higher sensitivity of NGS. MRD could be detected using NGS in 6 of 7 samples before autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation, and 5 of them tested negative post-transplantation. In contrast, the NGF method could detect MRD in only 1 sample pre-transplantation.ConclusionCompared with NGF, NGS exhibits higher sensitivity and reproducibility in MRD detection and can be an effective strategy for MRD monitoring in Chinese MM patients.
Project description:Here we compared clonotype identification by allele-specific oligonucleotide real-time quantitative-PCR (ASO RQ-PCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) in 80 multiple myeloma patients. ASO RQ-PCR was applicable in 49/55 (89%) and NGS in 62/78 (80%). Clonotypes identified by both methods were identical in 33/35 (94%). Sensitivity of 10-5 was confirmed in 28/29 (96%) by NGS while sensitivity of RQ-PCR was 10-5 in 7 (24%), 5 × 10-5 in 15 (52%), and 10-4 in 7 (24%). Among 14 samples quantifiable by ASO RQ-PCR, NGS yielded comparable results in 12 (86%). Applicability of NGS can be improved if immunoglobulin heavy-chain incomplete DJ primers are included.
Project description:Assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD) is becoming a standard diagnostic tool for curable hematological malignancies such as chronic and acute myeloid leukemia. Multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable disease, as a major portion of patients even in complete response eventually relapse, suggesting that residual disease remains. Over the past decade, the treatment landscape of MM has radically changed with the introduction of new effective drugs and the availability of immunotherapy, including targeted antibodies and adoptive cell therapy. Therefore, conventional serological and morphological techniques have become suboptimal for the evaluation of depth of response. Recently, the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) introduced the definition of MRD negativity as the absence of clonal Plasma cells (PC) with a minimum sensitivity of <10-5 either by next-generation sequencing (NGS) using the LymphoSIGHT platform (Sequenta/Adaptative) or by next-generation flow cytometry (NGF) using EuroFlow approaches as the reference methods. While the definition of the LymphoSIGHT platform (Sequenta/Adaptive) as the standard method derives from its large use and validation in clinical studies on the prognostic value of NGS-based MRD, other commercially available options exist. Recently, the LymphoTrack assay has been evaluated in MM, demonstrating a sensitivity level of 10-5, hence qualifying as an alternative effective tool for MRD monitoring in MM. Here, we will review state-of-the-art methods for MRD assessment by NGS. We will summarize how MRD testing supports clinical trials as a useful tool in dynamic risk-adapted therapy. Finally, we will also discuss future promise and challenges of NGS-based MRD determination for clinical decision-making. In addition, we will present our real-life single-center experience with the commercially available NGS strategy LymphoTrack-MiSeq. Even with the limitation of a limited number of patients, our results confirm the LymphoTrack-MiSeq platform as a cost-effective, readily available, and standardized workflow with a sensitivity of 10-5. Our real-life data also confirm that achieving MRD negativity is an important prognostic factor in MM.
Project description:Detecting persistent minimal residual disease (MRD) allows the identification of patients with an increased risk of relapse and death. In this study, we have evaluated MRD 3 months after transplantation in 106 myeloma patients using a commercial next-generation sequencing (NGS) strategy (LymphoTrack®), and compared the results with next-generation flow (NGF, EuroFlow). The use of different marrow pulls and the need of concentrating samples for NGS biased the applicability for MRD evaluation and favored NGF. Despite that, correlation between NGS and NGF was high (R2 = 0.905). The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates by NGS and NGF were longer for undetectable vs. positive patients (NGS: 88.7% vs. 56.6%; NGF: 91.4% vs. 50%; p < 0.001 for both comparisons), which resulted in a 3-year overall survival (OS) advantage (NGS: 96.2% vs. 77.3%; NGF: 96.6% vs. 74.9%, p < 0.01 for both comparisons). In the Cox regression model, NGS and NGF negativity had similar results but favoring the latter in PFS (HR: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.09-0.45, p < 0.001) and OS (HR: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.06-0.75, p = 0.02). All these results reinforce the role of MRD detection by different strategies in patient prognosis and highlight the use of MRD as an endpoint for multiple myeloma treatment.
Project description:Despite achieving a hematologic complete response after treatment, many patients with AL amyloidosis do not attain recovery of organ function and/or experience hematologic relapse. A persistent plasma cell clone producing amyloidogenic light chains at levels below the detection threshold of traditional serologic methods is hypothesized to impede organ response in some patients. Assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD) may therefore have clinical importance as a more stringent treatment response tool for patients in a hematologic complete response. We used 2-tube, 10-color combination multiparametric flow cytometry to assess for MRD at a minimum sensitivity of 1 in 105 nucleated cells. Of 65 patients in hematologic complete response, 36 (55%) were found to have a residual clonal plasma cell population in the bone marrow. Comparing the MRD-negative and MRD-positive groups, renal response was observed in 88% vs 64% (P = .06), cardiac response in 75% vs 59% (P = .45), and any organ response in 90% vs 75% (P = .20) of patients. Depth of organ response as measured by the percent decrease in 24-hour proteinuria and brain natriuretic peptide was 96% vs 91% (P = .16) and 55% vs 46% (P = .66), respectively. These data suggest a possible correlation between MRD negativity and higher probability of organ response after treatment in AL amyloidosis. Future prospective studies with a larger cohort are needed to determine the clinical relevance of these improvements. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00898235.
Project description:Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who achieve blood or bone marrow (BM) undetectable minimal residual disease (U-MRD) status after first-line fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) have prolonged progression-free survival (PFS), when assessed by an assay with sensitivity 10-4 (MRD4). Despite reaching U-MRD4, many patients, especially those with unmutated IGHV, subsequently relapse, suggesting residual disease <10-4 threshold and the need for more sensitive MRD evaluation. MRD evaluation by next-generation sequencing (NGS) has a sensitivity of 10-6 (MRD6). To better assess the depth of remission following first-line FCR treatment, we used NGS (Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation) to assess MRD in 62 patients, all of whom had BM U-MRD by multicolor flow cytometry (sensitivity 10-4) at end-of-FCR treatment. Samples from these patients included 57 BM samples, 29 peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples, and 32 plasma samples. Only 27.4% of the 62 patients had U-MRD by NGS. Rate of U-MRD by NGS was lowest in BM (25%), compared with PBMC (55%) or plasma (75%). No patient with U-MRD by NGS in BM or PBMC was MRD+ in plasma. Patients with mutated IGHV were more likely to have U-MRD by NGS at the end of treatment (EOT; 41% vs 13%, P = .02) than those with unmutated IGHV. Median follow-up was 81.6 months. Patients with U-MRD at EOT had superior PFS vs MRD+ patients, regardless of sample type assessed (BM, P = .02, median not reached [NR] vs 67 months; PBMC, P = .02, median NR vs 74 months). More sensitive MRD6 testing increases prognostic discrimination over MRD4 testing.