Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Comparison of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and next-generation flow (NGF) for minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment in multiple myeloma.


ABSTRACT: Detecting persistent minimal residual disease (MRD) allows the identification of patients with an increased risk of relapse and death. In this study, we have evaluated MRD 3 months after transplantation in 106 myeloma patients using a commercial next-generation sequencing (NGS) strategy (LymphoTrack®), and compared the results with next-generation flow (NGF, EuroFlow). The use of different marrow pulls and the need of concentrating samples for NGS biased the applicability for MRD evaluation and favored NGF. Despite that, correlation between NGS and NGF was high (R2?=?0.905). The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates by NGS and NGF were longer for undetectable vs. positive patients (NGS: 88.7% vs. 56.6%; NGF: 91.4% vs. 50%; p?

SUBMITTER: Medina A 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7603393 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications


Detecting persistent minimal residual disease (MRD) allows the identification of patients with an increased risk of relapse and death. In this study, we have evaluated MRD 3 months after transplantation in 106 myeloma patients using a commercial next-generation sequencing (NGS) strategy (LymphoTrack®), and compared the results with next-generation flow (NGF, EuroFlow). The use of different marrow pulls and the need of concentrating samples for NGS biased the applicability for MRD evaluation and  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC9175670 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10951185 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5629369 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9928796 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7874334 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7878533 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6924563 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7464347 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9426755 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8616165 | biostudies-literature