Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Cost-Effectiveness of Baricitinib for Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis After Methotrexate Failed in China.


ABSTRACT:

Introduction

A phase 3 (RA-BEAM study) clinical trial reported that baricitinib (BCT) + methotrexate (MTX) had clinical improvement compared with adalimumab (ADA) + MTX as a first-line strategy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had inadequate responses to MTX monotherapy. However, from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, the cost-effectiveness of introducing BCT into current treatment for patients with RA unresponsive to MTX remains unclear.

Methods

A patient-level microsimulation model was used to extrapolate the lifetime incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and other outcomes. This study compared treatment sequences with or without first-line BCT with current treatment sequences, including adalimumab, etanercept, tocilizumab, and palliative care. Effectiveness and physical function were assessed using the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 response and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). The input parameters of the model, comprising patient characteristics (sex and age) and treatment efficacy (ACR responses and HAQ score), were derived from a phase III clinical trial and network meta-analysis. The total cost estimation included direct costs and indirect costs. Probabilistic and univariate sensitivity analyses were performed, as were a series of scenario analyses.

Results

The lifetime analysis revealed that adding BCT as a first-line treatment resulted in a QALY gain of 2.66 years; this gain would cost an incremental $26,662, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $10,036/QALY per patient compared with the current treatment sequence. Sensitivity and scenario analyses showed the results to be robust.

Conclusions

From a Chinese payer perspective, the introduction of BCT into the current treatment sequence is projected to be a cost-effective option as first-, second-, third-, and fourth-line treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe RA.

SUBMITTER: Li S 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8217482 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6560251 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8350709 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4860865 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7552555 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5696291 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7299462 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6097080 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8121442 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9185960 | biostudies-literature
2016-03-16 | GSE74143 | GEO