Dataset Information

Correlation Between Portal Pressure and Indocyanine Green Retention Rate is Unaffected by the Cause of Cirrhosis: A Prospective Study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Accurate estimation of the hepatic functional reserve before liver resection is important to avoid post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association of indocyanine green retention test with portal pressure by the cause of cirrhosis (non-viral vs. viral) and assessed postoperative outcomes including incidence of PHLF in patients with viral and non-viral cirrhosis.

Methods

The cohort includes 50 consecutive patients with liver cirrhosis scheduled for liver resection for primary liver tumors at the Lausanne University Hospital between 2009 and 2018.

Results

There were 31 patients with non-viral liver cirrhosis (Non-virus group) and 19 with viral liver cirrhosis (virus group). The indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min (ICG-R15) (p = 0.276), Hepatic Venous Portal Gradient (HVPG; p = 0.301), and postoperative outcomes did not differ between the non-virus group and viral group. ICG-R15 and HVPG showed a significant linear correlation in all patients (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, ρ = 0.599, p < 0.001), the non-virus group (ρ = 0.555, p = 0.026), and the virus group (ρ = 0.534, p = 0.007). A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that ICG-R15 was a predictor for presence of portal hypertension (PH; HVPG ≥ 12 mmHg) (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.780). The cut-off value of ICG-R15 for predicting the presence of PH was 16.0% with 72.3% of sensitivity and 79.0% of specificity.

Conclusions

The ICG-R15 level was associated with portal pressure in both patients with non-virus cirrhosis and patients with virus cirrhosis and predicts the incidence of PH with relatively good discriminatory ability. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: https://clinicalTrials.gov(ID:NCT00827723) LOCAL ETHICS COMMITTEE NUMBER: CER-VD 251.08.

SUBMITTER: Kobayashi K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8236033 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Liver cirrhosis is a relevant comorbidity with increasing prevalence. Postoperative decompensation and development of complications in patients with cirrhosis remains a frequent clinical problem. Surgery has been discussed as a precipitating event for decompensation and complications of cirrhosis, but the underlying pathomechanisms are still obscure. The aim of this study was to analyze the role of abdominal extrahepatic surgery in cirrhosis on portal pressure and fibrosis in a preclinical model. Methods: Compensated liver cirrhosis was induced using tetrachlormethane (CCL4) inhalation and bile duct ligation (BDL) models in rats, non-cirrhotic portal hypertension by partial portal vein ligation (PPVL). Intestinal manipulation (IM) as a model of extrahepatic abdominal surgery was performed. 2 and 7 days after IM, portal pressure was measured in-vivo. Hydroxyproline measurements, Sirius Red staining and qPCR measurements of the liver were performed for evaluation of fibrosis development and hepatic inflammation. Laboratory parameters of liver function in serum were analyzed. Results: Portal pressure was significantly elevated 2 and 7 days after IM in both models of cirrhosis. In the non-cirrhotic model the trend was the same, while not statistically significant. In both cirrhotic models, IM shows strong effects of decompensation, with significant weight loss, elevation of liver enzymes and hypoalbuminemia. 7 days after IM in the BDL group, Sirius red staining and hydroxyproline levels showed significant progression of fibrosis and significantly elevated mRNA levels of hepatic inflammation compared to the respective control group. A progression of fibrosis was not observed in the CCL4 model. Conclusion: In animal models of cirrhosis with continuous liver injury (BDL), IM increases portal pressure, and development of fibrosis. Perioperative portal pressure and hence inflammation processes may be therapeutic targets to prevent post-operative decompensation in cirrhosis.

Project description:BACKGROUND:In preclinical models, recombinant human relaxin-2 (serelaxin) had anti-fibrotic effects and ameliorated portal hypertension (PH). A small exploratory study in patients with cirrhosis also suggested that serelaxin could reduce portal pressure. METHODS:In a phase 2, double-blind, randomised controlled study conducted in a single centre (Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, UK), male and female adult participants with cirrhosis and clinically significant PH (CSPH; hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) >?10?mmHg) were enrolled. Participants were allocated to serelaxin or placebo in a 3:1 ratio. The placebo was matched to serelaxin on appearance and administration protocol to create and maintain blinding. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in fasting HVPG after 2?h of peripheral i.v. serelaxin infusion (80??g/kg/day for 60?min followed by 30??g/kg/day for at least 60?min). Secondary endpoints included the change from baseline in hepatic blood flow and systemic haemodynamics (cardiac index, systemic vascular resistance index and aortic pulse wave velocity). Short-term safety and tolerability of serelaxin were assessed. RESULTS:A total of 17 participants were screened, 15 were randomised and 11 completed the study (n =?9 serelaxin, n =?2 placebo). Reasons for withdrawal were baseline HVPG <?10?mmHg (n =?2) and technical failure (n =?2). The trial ended early due to manufacturer discontinuation of the study drug. The median age was 56 (range 43-69) years and 73% of participants were male. Alcohol was the commonest cirrhosis aetiology (n =?10). Participants had a median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score of 10 (range 6-14). The mean baseline HVPG was 16.3?(range 10.3-21.7) mmHg. Individual responses were variable, but overall there was no statistically significant change in HVPG after 2?h of i.v. serelaxin (arithmetic mean of difference?±?SD was 0.4?±?3.5?mmHg (95% CI -2.3, 3.1; p =?0.76)). There were also no substantial changes from baseline in hepatic or systemic haemodynamics. We recorded 12 adverse events in 7 participants treated with serelaxin; none were significant, and most were unrelated to the investigational medicinal product. There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSION:In a small randomised, phase 2, proof-of-concept study in patients with cirrhosis and CSPH, serelaxin infusion was safe and well-tolerated but had a neutral effect on HVPG. TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02669875. Registered on 1 February 2016.