Reinfection or reactivation: Genome-based two distinct SNP profile of SARS-CoV2 repositivity in an Indian case.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Dhar MS
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8251007 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jul
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Reinfection or reactivation: Genome-based two distinct SNP profile of SARS-CoV2 repositivity in an Indian case.
Dhar Mahesh S MS Asokachandran Vivekanand V Uppili Bharathram B Tyagi Nishu N Sharma Pooja P Tiwari Simmi S Srinivasan RadhaKrishnan V RV Marwal Robin R Kanakan Akshay A Khan Azka M AM Pandey Rajesh R Jais Manoj M Gogoi Sanjib S Shewale Ajit A Nale Tushar T Kabra Sandhya S Faruq Mohammed M Singh Sujeet S Agrawal Anurag A Rakshit Partha P
Journal of medical virology 20210403 7
Similar Datasets
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC8426799 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The genetic diversity of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV2) in several countries sums up to worldwide genetic diversity. In this present study, variations in terms of missense mutations among the SARS-CoV2 genomes from 128 Indian patients, as of May 2020, are accounted and thereby some key findings with some hypotheses were made. These mutations across various genes of these genomes show wide genetic variations in sequence and rapid evolution of SARS-CoV2 virus. The presence of unique mutations in the studied SARS-CoV2 genomes may led to their attenuation. Few Genes such as ORF6, ORF10 are free from any mutations in the Indian context of 339 genomes observed as of 14th July 2020. Further, E protein contains only one mutation. This may suggest that designing a therapeutic approach against ORF6, ORF10 and E genes may have a beneficial effect in controlling COVID-19 pandemic especially in India.
| S-EPMC7434617 | biostudies-literature
Project description:INSACOG
| PRJEB81436 | ENA
Project description:A global emergency due to the COVID-19 pandemic demands various studies related to genes and genomes of the SARS-CoV2. Among other important proteins, the role of accessory proteins are of immense importance in replication, regulation of infections of the coronavirus in the hosts. The largest accessory protein in the SARS-CoV2 genome is ORF3a which modulates the host response to the virus infection and consequently it plays an important role in pathogenesis. In this study, an attempt is made to decipher the conservation of nucleotides, dimers, codons and amino acids in the ORF3a genes across thirty-two genomes of Indian patients. ORF3a gene possesses single and double point mutations in Indian SARS-CoV2 genomes suggesting the change of SARS-CoV2's virulence property in Indian patients. We find that the parental origin of the ORF3a gene over the genomes of SARS-CoV2 and Pangolin-CoV is same from the phylogenetic analysis based on conservation of nucleotides and so on. This study highlights the accumulation of mutation on ORF3a in Indian SARS-CoV2 genomes which may provide the designing therapeutic approach against SARS-CoV2.
| S-EPMC7291963 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC7833993 | biostudies-literature
Project description:A healthcare worker presented with fever, cough, headache and tested positive by SARS-CoV-2 real time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). He got admitted to hospital and recovered after 14 days. After 2 months, as a screening protocol considering the high risk setup he got tested and again found to be positive for SARS-CoV-2 by qRT-PCR. Our patient had detectable levels of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies during the reinfection but found negative for Neutralizing antibodies (NAb). Our findings suggest that the person after the initial infection might not develop the desired protective immunity to prevent the reinfection as demonstrated by absence of NAb.
| S-EPMC8590946 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundSIREN is a healthcare worker cohort study aiming to determine COVID-19 incidence, duration of immunity and vaccine effectiveness across 135 NHS organisations in four UK nations. Conducting an intensive prospective cohort study during a pandemic was challenging. We designed an evolving retention programme, informed by emerging evidence on best practice. This included applying a multifactorial approach, and considering strategies for barrier reduction, community building, follow-up, and tracing. We utilised participant engagement tools underpinned by our Participant Involvement Panel (PIP) and here we evaluate cohort retention over time and identify learnings.MethodsA mixed method evaluation of cohort retention in 12 and 24-month follow-up (June 2020 - March 2023). We described cohort retention by demographics and site, using odds ratios from logistic regression. Withdrawal reasons during this time were collected by survey. We collected participant feedback via cross-sectional online survey conducted October - November 2022, utilising a behavioural science approach. We conducted two focus groups with research teams in February 2023 and conducted thematic analysis exploring cohort retention challenges and facilitators.Results37,275 (84.7%) participants completed 12-months of follow-up. Of 14,772 participants extending their follow-up to 24 months, 12,635 (85.5%) completed this. Retention increased with age in the 12 (55-64 years vs < 25 years OR = 2.50; 95% CI: 2.19-2.85; p < 0.001) and 24-month (> 65 years vs < 25 years OR = 2.92; 95% CI: 1.78-4.88; p < 0.001) cohorts. Retention was highest in the Asian and Black ethnic groups compared to White in the 12 (OR = 1.38; 95% CI: 1.23-1.56; p < 0.001, and OR = 1.64; 95% CI: 1.30-2.08; p < 0.001) and 24-month (OR = 1.78; 95% CI: 1.42-2.25; p < 0.001, and OR = 2.12; 95% CI: 1.41-3.35; p < 0.001) cohort. Among participants withdrawing, the median time in follow-up at withdrawal was 7 months (IQR: 4-10 months) within the 12-month cohort and 19 months within the 24-month cohort (IQR: 16-22 months). The top three reasons for participant withdrawal were workload, leaving site employment and medical reasons. Themes identified from focus-groups included: the need to monitor and understand participant motivation over time, the necessity of inclusive and comprehensive communication, the importance of acknowledging participant contributions, building collaboration with local research teams, and investing in the research team skillset.ConclusionParticipant retention in the SIREN study remained high over 24-months of intensive follow-up, demonstrating that large cohort studies are feasible as a pandemic research tool. Our evaluation suggests it is possible to maintain an engaged cohort of healthcare workers (HCWs) during an acute pandemic response phase. The insights gained from this population group are important, as a highly exposed group fulfilling an essential pandemic response and patient care function. The success of the cohort study overall, as well as the specific population group retained, offer useful insight for pandemic preparedness planning and healthcare worker studies.
| S-EPMC11783804 | biostudies-literature
Project description:In genetic association studies, much effort has focused on moving beyond the initial single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-by-SNP analysis. One approach is to reanalyze a chromosomal region where an association has been detected, jointly analyzing the SNP thought to best represent that association with each additional SNP in the region. Such joint analyses may help identify additional, statistically independent association signals. However, it is possible for a single genetic effect to produce joint SNP results that would typically be interpreted as two distinct effects (e.g., both SNPs are significant in the joint model). We present a general approach that can (1) identify conditions under which a single variant could produce a given joint SNP result, and (2) use these conditions to identify variants from a list of known SNPs (e.g., 1000 Genomes) as candidates that could produce the observed signal. We apply this method to our previously reported joint result for smoking involving rs16969968 and rs588765 in CHRNA5. We demonstrate that it is theoretically possible for a joint SNP result suggestive of two independent signals to be produced by a single causal variant. Furthermore, this variant need not be highly correlated with the two tested SNPs or have a large odds ratio. Our method aids in interpretation of joint SNP results by identifying new candidate variants for biological causation that would be missed by traditional approaches. Also, it can connect association findings that may seem disparate due to lack of high correlations among the associated SNPs.
| S-EPMC3743534 | biostudies-literature
Project description:From February 26, 2020 to March 11, 2021, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic resulted in 11,439,558 cases and 277,102 deaths in Brazil. Among them, 2,195,130 cases and 63,965 deaths occurred in Sao Paulo State, Southeast Brazil. The recent emergence and rise of new variants of SARS-CoV-2 is of concern because of their higher transmissibility and possible association with more severe disease. Cases of SARS-CoV-2 reinfections have been described since December 2020 in Brazil. This report describes two cases of COVID-19 reinfection, that occurred five and six months after the first infection, during the second wave of the pandemic in Sao Paulo State. Both patients presented mild symptoms in the two COVID-19 episodes and different lineages of SARS-CoV-2 were identified: B.1.1.33 and B.1.1.28 lineages in case 1 and B1.1.128 and P. 2 lineages in case 2.
| S-EPMC8216690 | biostudies-literature