Dataset Information

Predictive value of lncRNA LOC100505851 in breast cancer in the neoadjuvant setting.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The expression and function of long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) LOC100505851 in breast cancer are still unknown. We aimed to examine the expression of lncRNA LOC100505851 in breast cancer and adjacent tissues and preliminarily explore its predictive value and function in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy (NAT).

Methods

The expression of lncRNA LOC100505851 was tested by qRT-PCR. The correlation between LOC100505851 expression and clinicopathological factors as well as pathological complete response (pCR) was analyzed by chi-squared test and logistic regression, respectively. The online database Kaplan-Meier plotter (KM plotter) was used to compare relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) between groups with different LOC100505851 expression levels. Subcellular localization of LOC100505851 was determined by nuclear and cytoplasmic extraction. A bioinformatics tool was used to predict RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) and interaction among these proteins.

Results

LncRNA LOC100505851 was significantly expressed at lower levels in cancer tissues than in adjacent tissues (P<0.001). Its expression was related to human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression (P=0.003) and molecular subtype based on immunohistochemistry (P=0.001). Patients with high LOC100505851 expression were prone to pCR (OR =3.077, 95% CI: 1.042-9.086, P=0.042) and better RFS (HR =0.68, 95% CI: 0.59-0.79, P<0.001) and OS (HR =0.60, 95% CI: 0.43-0.84, P=0.0026) according to the online database KM plotter. The subcellular localization of LOC100505851 was in the nucleus, and its binding proteins were predicted by bioinformatics tools.

Conclusions

LncRNA LOC100505851 was located mainly in the nucleus and was significantly downregulated in breast cancers. Its expression was related to a higher pCR rate and better RFS and OS, indicating its potential value as a novel predictive and prognostic biomarker in breast cancer.

SUBMITTER: Sha R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8258879 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background:The aims of this study were to determine whether the quantitative HER2 gene amplification level is related to the key clinicopathological features that represent the aggressiveness of breast cancer (BC) and to determine whether the quantitative HER2 gene amplification level could predict the treatment response in the subset of HER2-positive patients who received neoadjuvant targeted therapy. Materials and methods:Patients treated with weekly cisplatin- and paclitaxel-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy, who had undergone both immunohistochemistry and the fluorescence in situ hybridization test for HER2, were included in the study (n=103). For HER2-positive patients, defined as immunohistochemistry score 3+ or fluorescence in situ hybridization ratio ?2.0, trastuzumab was recommended with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n=45). Pathological complete response was defined as complete pathological remission of tumor cells both in breast and axillary lymph nodes postoperation. Results:In all patients enrolled in the study, a higher HER2 amplification level was significantly correlated with larger tumor size and the absence of ER and PR expression. In HER2-positive patients treated with neoadjuvant trastuzumab concurrent with chemotherapy, both univariate and multivariate logistic regression showed that a higher HER2/CEP17 ratio and HER2 gene copy number were associated with a higher pathological complete response rate. When calculated by receiver operating characteristics analysis, an optimal cutoff of 4.5 for the HER2/CEP17 ratio was expected to distinguish the most sensitive candidate for treatment with a combination of trastuzumab and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusion:A higher HER2 amplification level was correlated with larger tumor size and reduced ER and PR expression, which may indicate more aggressive tumor behavior. For HER2-positive patients, the HER2/CEP17 ratio and HER2 gene copy number may be good predictive factors for concurrent neoadjuvant trastuzumab and chemotherapy.

Project description:BackgroundZinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1 (ZEB1) is a molecule involved in the progression of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in various kinds of cancers. Here, we aimed to determine whether the expression of the ZEB1 protein is related to the response of patients to neoadjuvant therapy as well as their survival outcome.MethodsImmunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on paraffin-embedded tumor samples from core needle biopsy before neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the associations between the protein expression of ZEB1 and the pathological complete response (pCR) outcome. Kaplan-Meier plots and log-rank tests were used to compare disease-free survival (DFS) between groups. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to calculate the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% confidential interval (95% CI).ResultsA total of 75 patients were included in the IHC test. High ZEB1 protein expression was associated with a low pCR rate in both univariate (OR = 0.260, 95% CI 0.082-0.829, p = 0.023) and multivariate (OR = 0.074, 95% CI 0.011-0.475, p = 0.006) logistic regression analyses. High ZEB1 protein expression was also associated with a short DFS according to both the log-rank test (p = 0.023) and Cox proportional hazard model (HR = 9.025, 95% CI 1.024-79.519, p = 0.048). In hormone receptor positive (HorR-positive) patients, high ZEB1 protein expression was also associated with a lower pCR (OR = 0.054, 95% CI 0.007-0.422, p = 0.005) and a poorer DFS (HR = 10.516, 95% CI 1.171-94.435, p = 0.036) compared with low ZEB1 protein expression. In HER2-overexpressing patients, ZEB1 protein expression was also associated with poor survival (p = 0.042).ConclusionsOur results showed that high ZEB1 protein expression was a negative predictive marker of pCR and DFS in neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer patients and in HorR-positive and HER2-overexpressing subgroups.Trial registration NCT, NCT02199418. Registered 24 July 2014-Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02199418?term=NCT02199418&rank=1. NCT, NCT 02221999. Registered 21 August 2014-Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02221999?term=NCT02221999&rank=1.

Project description:BackgroundPathological complete response (pCR) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been regarded as a surrogate endpoint for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with breast cancer. No consensus regarding the definition of pCR has been established; there are several definitions according to a variety of classifications. Eradication of cancer cells in both breast and lymph nodes has been better associated with improved prognosis than in the breast alone. Even in patients diagnosed as having clinically node-negative cancer before NAC, postoperative pathological examination often shows axillary lymph node metastases.Patients and methodsOf the 771 patients with breast cancer who underwent NAC in the Cancer Institute Hospital between January 2000 and May 2009, 146 patients preoperatively diagnosed as having node-negative breast cancer were retrospectively evaluated. We have made the definition of clinically lymph node-negative (N0) as follows: first, ultrasonography before NAC did not show any lymphadenopathy. Second, a cytological procedure confirmed negative study for each patient when ultrasonography suggested lymphadenopathy.ResultsThe median observation period was 79.7 months, and the median age of the subjects was 51 years. Pathological examination at the time of the surgery showed lymph node metastases (ypN+) in 46 patients (31.5%). Histological therapeutic effects revealed ypT0/is in 9 patients (6.2%) and ypTinv in 137 (93.8%). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that younger age (49>), large tumor size, NG3, and ypN+ were significant poor prognostic factors for DFS (p = 0.020, p = 0.008, P = 0.022 and p = 0.010, respectively). Moreover, ypN+ was the only significant poor prognostic factor for OS (p = 0.022). The predictive factors of ypN+ in clinically lymph node-negative breast cancer were ypTinv (p = 0.036) and the luminal type (HR+ and HER2-) (p = 0.029).ConclusionThe prognosis of clinically lymph node negative breast cancer depended on ypN+, which was associated with ypTinv and luminal subtype.