Narrative review of immunotherapy in thymic malignancies.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Benitez JC
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8264314 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:The emergence of immunotherapy as a modern pillar of cancer treatment has changed the treatment landscape for various cancers. Immune checkpoint inhibitors directed at programed death-1 (PD-1) or its ligand (PD-L1), in particular, have found widespread clinical applications and have resulted in durable responses and an improvement in survival of patients with advanced or metastatic disease. Tumor cell PD-L1 expression and tumor mutation burden (TMB) are biomarkers of response and efforts are underway to identify other biomarkers that might predict benefit with these drugs. Most patients tolerate immunotherapy well, although a subset of patients develop immune-mediated toxicity due to excessive immune stimulation. Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) have a unique biology which can predispose to development of autoimmune paraneoplastic disease, especially in patients with thymoma. Due to defects in immunological self-tolerance, the use of immunotherapy in TET patients is associated with an increased risk of immune-mediated adverse events, which can be potentially life-threatening. Development of biomarkers of response and toxicity is particularly important for the treatment of TETs since it is important to identify patients who might benefit from treatment and be at low risk for development of severe immune toxicity. The use of immunotherapy in patients with autoimmune disorders and those who have previously experienced immune-mediated toxicity is currently an area of active research. Various risk mitigation strategies are under evaluation in prospective clinical trials, including trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with thymic cancers.
| S-EPMC8445513 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and objectiveThymic carcinoma is an exceptionally rare cancer, with an annual incidence of just 0.15-0.29 per 100,000 people. Owing to its rarity, only few proven treatments have been developed. Understanding its genetic profile is crucial for the development of targeted therapies. However, limited studies have exclusively examined thymic carcinoma mutations, with most investigation combining thymomas and thymic carcinomas. This paper reviews findings from genetic studies focusing on thymic carcinoma alone and compares them to those of thymoma.MethodsWe conducted a PubMed search for relevant English studies on thymic carcinoma genomics. Then, key papers utilizing target sequencing or whole-exome sequencing were analyzed.Key content and findingsThe most frequently mutated genes were TP53, CDKN2A, CDKN2B, CYLD, KIT, TET2, SETD2, BAP1, and ASXL1. TP53 and CDKN2A are correlated with poor prognosis. CYLD, which regulates signaling related with proliferation and interacts with AIRE expression and T cell development, might predict the immunotherapy response. KIT mutations might enable targeted therapy. TET2, SETD2, BAP1, and ASXL1 regulate epigenetics, suggesting disruption of these mechanisms. Higher tumor mutational burden (TMB) and 16q loss distinguish thymic carcinoma from thymoma. Although some copy number aberrations are shared, thymic carcinoma exhibits a mutational profile distinct from that of thymoma.ConclusionsThymic carcinoma demonstrates a unique genomic landscape, suggesting a molecular pathogenesis distinct from that of thymoma. Our findings revealed prognostic biomarkers such as TP53/CDKN2A and potential therapeutic targets such as KIT. Because thymic carcinoma is extremely rare, sharing molecular profiling data could provide valuable insights into the molecular mechanisms driving the development of these tumors.
| S-EPMC11330910 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Glioblastoma and other high-grade gliomas (HGGs) are the most common and deadly primary brain tumors. Due to recent advances in immunotherapy and improved clinical outcomes in other disease sites, the study of immunotherapy in HGG has increased significantly. Herein, we summarize and evaluate existing evidence and ongoing clinical trials investigating the use of immunotherapy in the treatment of HGG, including therapeutic vaccination, immune checkpoint inhibition, adoptive lymphocyte transfer, and combinatorial approaches utilizing radiation and multiple modalities of immunotherapy. Special attention is given to the mechanisms by which radiation may improve immunogenicity in HGG, why this motivates the study of radiation in combination with immunotherapy, and how to determine optimal dosing and scheduling of radiation. Though larger randomized controlled trials have not consistently shown improvements in clinical outcomes, this area of research is still in its early stages and a number of important lessons can be taken away from the studies that have been completed to date. Many studies found a subset of patients who experienced durable responses, and analysis of their immune cells and tumor cells can be used to identify biomarkers that predict therapeutic response, as well as additional glioma-specific targets that can enhance therapeutic efficacy in a challenging tumor type.
| S-EPMC8797698 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Definitive and adjuvant radiation and chemoradiation have been mainstays in the management of multiple gynecologic malignancies for decades. However, despite these treatments, the prognosis of patients with locally advanced, recurrent, refractory, and metastatic disease continues to be poor. Over the last decade, immune checkpoint inhibitors have emerged as a promising therapeutic modality, but response rates to monotherapy are low. Mounting basic science and translational research suggests that immunotherapy and radiation may act synergistically with the potential to improve clinical outcomes across multiple disease sites relative to monotherapy with either radiation or immunotherapy alone. Results from early clinical trials in other disease sites, and burgeoning trials within the gynecologic malignancies space hold promise for combined modality treatment. With increasing clinical data supporting combined modality therapy, there is interest in reevaluating treatment paradigms in gynecologic malignancies to improve the current standards of care. In this review, current proposed mechanisms, rationale, and evidence for treatment of gynecologic malignancies with combined radiation and immunotherapy, specifically immune checkpoint inhibitors, will be discussed. Additionally, although currently early and limited, existing clinical data will be summarized as it applies to cervical, endometrial, ovarian, and vulvar cancers. The status of current clinical trials investigating the sequencing, dosing, and fractionation of combined radiation and immunotherapy in these disease sites will also be reviewed.
| S-EPMC8797685 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Despite advances in chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery, prognosis in gastroesophageal cancers (GEC) remains poor. Recent studies have demonstrated that immune checkpoint inhibitors specific to the PD-1/PD-L1 axis can improve survival with dramatic durability for a subset of patients with GEC. Radiation therapy (RT) has been shown to enhance priming and anti-tumor immunogenicity. The combination of these two treatments has shown promising results acting synergistically in pre-clinical and clinical models. Much of this synergy appears linked to in-field radiation responses, but also the abscopal response where out-of-field tumors demonstrate regression. In this review, we summarize the current role of immunotherapy and radiation in GEC. We also highlight progress from preclinical studies and translational biomarker analyses that provide rationale for ongoing efforts combining immune checkpoint inhibition and radiotherapy specifically in GECs. Questions that remain unanswered in the clinic are the optimal radiation dosing, timing, and fractionation strategies to augment abscopal immune responses. Increasing recognition of the heterogeneity of immunosuppressive mechanisms that can arise in response to radiation indicates the need for novel immune checkpoint inhibitors that target beyond the PD-1/PD-L1 axis. Smartly designed prospective trials incorporating these two approaches with ongoing translational analyses will be critical in increasing the success of combinatorial radiation and immunotherapy strategies in this disease.
| S-EPMC8798391 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer morbidity and mortality worldwide among both men and women. While surgical resection remains the standard of care for early stage NSCLC, chemoradiation has been a mainstay of treatment for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) patients for decades. Consolidation immunotherapy has improved survival in this subset of patients after conventional chemoradiation, and has emerged as the new standard. The synergy between immunotherapy and radiation, as well as ongoing research on the effects of radiation on the immune system, allows for the exploration of new avenues in the treatment of LA-NSCLC. In addition to the use of durvalumab as consolidative systemic therapy after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for Stage III NSCLC, other combination regimens have been shown to be effective in various disease stages in preclinical and clinical studies. These regimens include CTLA-4 and PD/PDL-1 checkpoint inhibitors combined with radiation treatment. While these combined regimens have demonstrated efficacy, they are not without toxicity, and require additional evaluation when combined with radiation. In this review, we have summarized the immunostimulatory and immunosuppressive effects of radiation therapy. We also evaluate the current evidence and ongoing research supporting the combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy across early to LA-NSCLC.
| S-EPMC7842553 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) belong to orphan oncology. The incidence of TETs is about 1.3-3.2 cases per million worldwide. Following pathology, evolution and prognosis are variable. The World Health Organization classification distinguishes thymomas and thymic carcinomas. TETs are composed of thymic epithelial tumoral cells and normal lymphocytes. The mean age at diagnosis is 50-60 years-old. There are no identified risk factors. TETs are frequently associated with paraneoplastic syndromes as myasthenia gravis. The complete R0 surgical resection is the most significant prognosis factor on survival. In 2010, the French National Institute of Cancer labeled the RYTHMIC network as a specific tumor board including thoracic surgeons, oncologist, and radiation therapist to define standard of care for the management of TETs. The aim of the review was to update knowledge to optimize the standard of care.
| S-EPMC6660626 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) has become an attractive treatment modality in full bloom in recent years by presenting itself as a safe, noninvasive alternative to surgery to control primary or secondary malignancies. Although the focus has been on local tumor control as the therapeutic goal of stereotactic radiotherapy, rare but intriguing observations of abscopal (or out-of-field) effects have highlighted the exciting possibility of activating antitumor immunity using high-dose radiation. Furthermore, immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of several types of cancers in recent years. However, resistance to immunotherapy often develops. These observations have led researchers to combine immunotherapy with SRT in an attempt to improve outcomes. The benefits of this combination would come from the stimulation and suppression of various immune pathways. Thus, in this review, we will first discuss the immunomodulation induced by SRT with the promising results of preclinical studies on the changes in the immune balance observed after SRT. Then, we will discuss the opportunities and risks of the combination of SRT and immunotherapy with the preclinical and clinical data available in the literature. Furthermore, we will see that many perspectives are conceivable to potentiate the synergistic effects of this combination with the need for prospective studies to confirm the encouraging data.
| S-EPMC9219862 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Tumor immune tolerance remains a major barrier for effective anti-cancer therapy. A growing number of pathways whereby solid tumors escape immune surveillance have been characterized (1). This progress led us to revisit the "hallmarks of cancer" and brought forward many promising immunotherapies. Every growing bodies of research have brought forward many exciting treatment strategies for hematological cancers like chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T cells) and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Given the distinct characteristics of the different cancers, some benefited profoundly from such therapies while some remain challenging for scientists and physicians. Here, we discuss the unique aspect of hematological malignancies, and briefly review the history, existing and future of immunotherapies for this group of cancer.
| S-EPMC6709701 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PURPOSE OF REVIEW:Active investigation suggests immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and therapeutic cancer vaccines provide clinical benefit for genitourinary malignancies including prostate cancer, renal cell carcinoma, and bladder cancer. Recent developments in the utility of immune checkpoint inhibitor and vaccine therapy for the management of genitourinary malignancies are highlighted in this review. RECENT FINDINGS:Dramatic responses to checkpoint inhibitor therapy have been demonstrated in renal cell carcinoma and bladder cancer with recent Food and Drug Administration approvals in both indications. No benefit to checkpoint inhibitor therapy has yet been shown for the management of prostate cancer. Therapeutic cancer vaccines have also shown benefit in the treatment of genitourinary malignancies, specifically in the treatment of prostate cancer. Despite advances in these therapeutic modalities, benefit is limited to a subset of patients. SUMMARY:Current evidence supports the use of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and therapeutic cancer vaccines for the management of genitourinary malignancies. Further development of biomarkers for predicting response and study of combination therapy is required to achieve optimal efficacy with these therapeutic interventions.
| S-EPMC5129842 | biostudies-literature