Dataset Information

Anlotinib, Vincristine, and Irinotecan for Advanced Ewing Sarcoma After Failure of Standard Multimodal Therapy: A Two-Cohort, Phase Ib/II Trial.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Both protracted irinotecan and antiangiogenesis therapy have shown promising efficacy against Ewing sarcoma (EWS).

Methods

Patients diagnosed with recurrent or refractory EWS were enrolled and further categorized into cohort A (≥16 years) or cohort B (<16 years). In the dose-defining phase Ib portion, anlotinib was given daily at a fixed dose, while a 3+3 design with dose de-escalation was used to determine the dose of irinotecan. The next dose-expanding phase II portion employed a conventional two-stage study design model. The primary endpoint was objective response rate at 12 weeks (ORR_12w ).

Results

A total of 41 patients finally received the treatment regimen, including 29 in cohort A and 12 in cohort B. For cohort A, the first five patients were treated at the initial level of 20 mg/m² /d d × 5 × 2, and two of them subsequently a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). An additional six patients were then treated at 15 mg/m² without any DLT, and the RP2D was determined. Notably, 23 out of 24 patients in cohort A were available for response evaluation at 12 weeks. ORR_12w was determined to be 62.5%. For cohort B, no DLT was observed in the first six patients at the initial dose level. At last, 12 patients were included in cohort B. The ORR_12w was 83.3%. The most frequently observed grade 3/4 adverse events were leukopenia (28.5%), neutropenia (24.4%), anemia (8.7%), and diarrhea (3.7%).

Conclusion

The combination of vincristine, irinotecan, and anlotinib demonstrated an acceptable toxicity profile and promising clinical efficacy in patients with advanced EWS.

Implications for practice

This is the first trial to evaluate an irinotecan-based regimen in combination with antiangiogenesis tyrosine kinase inhibitors in Ewing sarcoma (EWS). A 3+3 design with dose de-escalation was used to determine the most appropriate dose of irinotecan in each cohort. The next dose-expanding phase II portion employed a conventional two-stage study design model. The objective response rate was 62.5% for adults and 83.3% for children. Median overall survival was not matured. This study shows that the combination of vincristine, irinotecan, and anlotinib demonstrates an acceptable toxicity profile and promising clinical efficacy in patients with advanced EWS.

SUBMITTER: Xu J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8265337 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe clinical significance of GLI1 expression either through canonical Hedgehog signal transduction or through non-canonical mechanisms in rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) or Ewing sarcoma (EWS) is incompletely understood. We tested a role for Hedgehog (HH) signal transduction and GL11 expression in development of vincristine (VCR) resistance in RMS and EWS.MethodsWe characterized baseline expression and activity of HH pathway components in 5 RMS (RD, Rh18, Ruch-2, Rh30, and Rh41) and 5 EWS (CHLA9, CHLA10, TC32, CHLA258, and TC71) cell lines. We then established VCR-resistant RMS and EWS cell lines by exposing cells to serially increasing concentrations of VCR and determining the IC50. We defined resistance as a ≥ 30-fold increase in IC50 compared with parental cells. We determined changes in gene expression in the VCR-resistant cells compared with parental cells using an 86-gene cancer drug resistance array that included GLI1 and tested the effect of GLI1 inhibition with GANT61 or GLI1 siRNA on VCR resistance.ResultsWe found evidence for HH pathway activity and GLI1 expression in RMS and EWS cell lines at baseline, and evidence that GLI1 contributes to survival and proliferation of these sarcoma cells. We were able to establish 4 VCR-resistant cell lines (Ruch-2VR, Rh30VR, Rh41VR, and TC71VR). GLI1 was significantly up-regulated in the Rh30VR, Rh41VR, and TC71VR cells. The only other gene in the drug resistance panel that was significantly up-regulated in each of these VCR-resistant cell lines compared with their corresponding parental cells was the GLI1 direct target and multidrug resistance gene, ATP-binding cassette sub-family B member 1 (MDR1). We established major vault protein (MVP), which was up-regulated in both vincristine-resistant alveolar RMS cell lines (Rh30VR and Rh41VR), as another direct target of GLI1 during development of drug resistance. Treatment of the VCR-resistant cell lines with the small molecule inhibitor GANT61 or GLI1 siRNA together with VCR significantly decreased cell viability at doses that did not reduce viability individually.ConclusionsThese experiments demonstrate that GLI1 up-regulation contributes to VCR resistance in RMS and EWS cell lines and suggest that targeting GLI1 may benefit patients with RMS or EWS by reducing multidrug resistance.

Project description:BackgroundThere are no clinical trials specifically addressing chemotherapy for adults with Ewing sarcoma (ES). Five-year event-free survival (EFS) of adults on pediatric studies of ES (44%-47%) is worse than that of children treated with the same therapy (69%). The object of this study was to review the results of therapy with vincristine, ifosfamide, and doxorubicin (VID) in the multidisciplinary treatment of adults with ES at our institution.Materials and methodsCharts for adults treated for ES from 1995 to 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinician-reported radiographic tumor response, type of local therapy, pathologic response, and survival data were collected.ResultsSeventy-one patients were identified who received VID as initial therapy. The median age was 25 (range: 16-64). Forty-two patients (59%) presented with a localized disease and 29 patients (41%) presented with a distant metastasis. Of all patients treated with VID, 83.6% showed a radiological response. Patients who presented with a localized disease had a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 68% (median not reached), compared with 10.3% (median: 1.9 years) in those who presented with distant metastases. Five-year EFS was 67%. The nine patients with a pelvic primary tumor had inferior 5-year OS (42%) to the 33 with primary tumors at other sites (75%). The 5-year OS of those who had greater than or equal to 95% necrosis after neoadjuvant VID (n = 20; 5-year OS: 84%) was superior to those who had less than 95% necrosis (n = 13; 5-year OS: 53%).ConclusionIn adults with primary ES, VID combined with an adjuvant strategy based on post-treatment percent necrosis has favorable outcomes compared with historical adult controls.Implications for practiceEwing sarcoma (ES) is a rare tumor in adults, and there are no dedicated clinical trials in the adult population. Most therapy is modeled after the published pediatric studies, although the small numbers of adult patients included on those studies did significantly worse than the children. We modeled our treatment on other adult sarcomas and reviewed the charts of 71 adult patients with ES treated with vincristine, ifosfamide, and doxorubicin (VID). In adults with primary ES, VID combined with an adjuvant strategy based on post-treatment percent necrosis has favorable outcomes compared with historical adult controls.

Project description:Preclinical studies have documented antitumor activity of PARP inhibition both in vitro and in vivo, against Ewing sarcoma cells. This study aimed to translate that observation into a clinical trial to assess the efficacy and tolerability of olaparib, a PARP inhibitor, in patients with advanced Ewing sarcoma (EWS) progressing after prior chemotherapy.In this nonrandomized phase II trial, adult participants with radiographically measureable metastatic EWS received olaparib tablets, 400 mg orally twice daily, until disease progression or drug intolerance. Tumor measurements were determined by CT or MRI at 6 and 12 weeks after starting olaparib administration, and then every 8 weeks thereafter. Tumor response determinations were made according to RECIST 1.1, and adverse event determinations were made according to CTCAE, version 4.0. A total of 22 participants were planned to be enrolled using a conventional 2-step phase II study design. If no objective responses were observed after 12 participants had been followed for at least 3 months, further accrual would be stopped.12 participants were enrolled, and all were evaluable. There were no objective responses (PR/CR), 4 SD (duration 10.9, 11.4, 11.9, and 17.9 wks), and 8 PD as best response. Of the SD, 2 had minor responses (-9% and -11.7% by RECIST 1.1). The median time to disease progression was 5.7 weeks. Further enrollment was therefore discontinued. No significant or unexpected toxicities were observed with olaparib, with only a single case each of grade 3 anemia and grade 3 thrombocytopenia observed.This study is the first report of a prospective phase II trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a PARP inhibitor in patients with advanced Ewing sarcoma after failure of standard chemotherapy. Olaparib administration was safe and well tolerated when administered to this small heavily pre-treated cohort at the 400 mg BID dose, although the median duration of dosing was for only 5.7 weeks. No significant responses or durable disease control was seen, and the short average interval to disease progression underscores the aggressiveness of this disease. Other studies to combine cytotoxic chemotherapy with PARP inhibition in EWS are actively ongoing.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01583543.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Antiangiogenesis tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been shown to prolong progression-free survival (PFS) in advanced osteosarcoma. Methylsulfonic apatinib is a TKI that specifically inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2. We aim to assess apatinib in patients with advanced high-grade osteosarcoma progressing upon chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS:This phase II trial was conducted at Peking University People's Hospital. We enrolled participants (≥16 years of age) with progressive relapsed or unresectable osteosarcoma. Participants received 750 mg or 500 mg of apatinib according to body surface area once daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate and PFS at 4 months. RESULTS:A total of 37 participants were finally included into the analysis. Until final follow-up, the objective response rate (complete response + partial response) was 43.24% (16/37). The 4-month PFS rate was 56.76% (95% confidence interval [CI], 39.43%-70.84%). Median PFS and overall survival were 4.50 (95% CI, 3.47-6.27) and 9.87 (95% CI 7.97-18.93) months, respectively. Toxic effects led to dose reductions or interruptions in a total of 25 of 37 (67.57%) patients. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were pneumothorax in six (16.22%) patients, wound dehiscence in four (10.81%), proteinuria in three (8.11%), diarrhea in three (8.11%), and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome in three (8.11%). No other serious adverse events were reported during the trial. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION:Apatinib is a sensitive drug for advanced osteosarcoma with a high response rate after failure of chemotherapy, with similar duration of response compared to other TKIs. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE:For advanced osteosarcoma progressing upon chemotherapy, antiangiogenesis tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been proved to be effective in prolonging the progression-free survival in previous multicenter trials and have been included into new National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines as second-line therapy. Apatinib is a TKI that specifically inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2, which is domestically made in China. This phase II trial supports the use of apatinib in patients with advanced osteosarcoma progressing after chemotherapy.