Dataset Information

Comparative genomic signatures in young and old Chinese patients with colorectal cancer.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Occurrence at a young age is known to be associated with unique clinical features in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the genomic differences between young and old patients with CRC are not well elucidated and, to the best of our knowledge, have never been investigated in a Chinese population.

Methods

Tumor tissue samples from 29 young (age ≤50 years) and 46 old (age >50 years) patients with CRC were collected. Targeted sequencing of 808 cancer-related genes was conducted to characterize the genomic landscape for Chinese CRC.

Results

Overall, mutational profiles exhibited notable differences between the two groups. In particular, APC and PIK3CA mutations were more frequently observed in old patients (p = 0.009 and p = 0.012, respectively), while SMAD4 mutations tended to occur in young patients (p = 0.054). Mutation loci distributions of KRAS in the young cohort differed from those in the old cohort, and a higher frequency of KRAS codon 12 mutations was potentially associated with a young age (p = 0.076). The frequencies of clinically actionable alterations were analyzed by defined age categories, which unveiled a distinctive targeted genomic profile in the young group. Furthermore, among patients with mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) CRC, tumor mutation burden (TMB) was positively correlated with age (Pearson's r = 0.306, p = 0.011), and genomic alterations associated with high TMB in young patients differentiated from those in old patients.

Conclusions

These findings revealed different molecular characterization between young and old Chinese patients with CRC, which may provide novel insights for the personalized treatment of CRC.

SUBMITTER: Wang F

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8267122 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundYoung lung cancer as a small subgroup of lung cancer has not been fully studied. Most of the previous studies focused on the clinicopathological features, but studies of molecular characteristics are still few and limited. Here, we explore the characteristics of prognosis and variation in young lung cancer patients with NSCLC.MethodsA total of 5639 young lung cancer samples (NSCLC, age ≤40) were screened from the SEER and the same number of the old (NSCLC, age ≥60) were screened by propensity score matching to evaluate the prognosis of two groups. 165 treatment-naïve patients diagnosed with NSCLC were enrolled to explore the molecular feature difference between two age-varying groups. CCLE cell line expression data was used to verify the finding from the cohort of 165 patients.ResultsThe overall survival of the young lung cancer group was significantly better than the old. Germline analysis showed a trend that the young group contained a higher incidence of germline alterations. The TMB of the young group was lower. Meanwhile, the heterogeneity and evolutionary degrees of the young lung cancer group were also lower than the old. The mutation spectrums of two groups exhibited variance with LRP1B, SMARCA4, STK11, FAT2, RBM10, FANCM mutations, EGFR L858R more recurrent in the old group and EML4-ALK fusions, BCL2L11 deletion polymorphism, EGFR 19DEL, 20IN more recurrent in the young group. For the base substitution, the young showed a lower fraction of transversion. Further, we performed a pathway analysis and found the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance pathway enriched in the young lung cancer group, which was validated in gene expression data later.ConclusionsThere were significantly different molecular features of the young lung cancer group. The young lung cancer group had a more simple alteration structure. Alteration spectrums and base substitution types varied between two groups, implying the different pathogenesis. The young lung cancer group had more potential treatment choices. Although young lung patients had better outcomes, there were still adverse factors of them, suggesting that the young group still needs more caution for treatment choice and monitoring after the treatment to further improve the prognosis.

Project description:BackgroundInherited susceptibility accounts for nearly one-third of colorectal cancer (CRC) predispositions and has an 80%-100% lifetime risk of this disease. However, there are few data about germline mutations of hereditary CRC-related genes in Chinese patients with CRC. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of gene mutations related to cancer susceptibility among Chinese patients with CRC, differences between Chinese and Western patients, and the phenotype-genotype correlation.MethodsWe retrospectively collected tumor samples from 526 patients with CRC under 70 years old who underwent hereditary CRC genetic testing. A series of bioinformatic analyses, as well as statistical comparisons, were performed.ResultsWe found that 77 patients (14.6%) harbored functional variants of the 12 genes. The mutation frequencies of the top 5 mutated genes were 6.5% for MutL homolog 1 (MLH1), 5.1% for MutS homolog 2 (MSH2), 1.0% for MSH6, 0.8% for PMS1 homolog 2 (PMS2), and 0.8% for APC regulator of the WNT signaling pathway (APC). Our data showed much higher rates of mutations of MSH6 and PMS2 genes among all mismatch repair (MMR) genes as compared with those in Western populations. Mutations in MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 were found to be mutually exclusive. Patients with MLH1 or MSH2 mutations had higher frequencies of personal history of cancer (MLH1: 20.6% vs. 8.7%; MSH2: 25.9% vs. 8.6%) and family history of cancer than those without these mutations (MLH1: 73.5% vs. 48.4%; MSH2: 70.4% vs. 48.9%), and the lesions were more prone to occur on the right side of the colon than on the left side (MLH1: 73.5% vs. 29.3%; MSH2: 56.0% vs. 31.0%). The proportion of stage I/II disease was higher in patients with MLH1 mutations than in those without MLH1 mutations (70.6% vs. 50.7%), and the rate of polyps was higher in patients with APC mutations than in those with wild-type APC (75.0% vs. 17.4%).ConclusionThese results provide a full-scale landscape of hereditary susceptibility over 12 related genes in CRC patients and suggest that a comprehensive multi-gene panel testing for hereditary CRC predisposition could be a helpful analysis in clinical practice.