Dataset Information

Outcomes of switching from crizotinib to alectinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer with anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusion.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Alectinib and crizotinib have been approved as first-line therapies for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene fusion. However, the therapeutic efficacy and side effects are still largely unknown of patients who switched to next-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs), such as alectinib, after experiencing no disease progression with initial crizotinib treatment.

Methods

This prospective real-world study enrolled patients who were treated with alectinib after experiencing no disease progression with initial crizotinib treatment. The patients' baseline characteristics, objective response rate (ORR) of crizotinib and alectinib, size change of target tumor lesions, treatment regimen and adverse events (AEs) were collected and analyzed.

Results

The study included 53 patients, the majority of whom (96.2%) had non-squamous NSCLC. The median age was 51 (range, 31-80) years old. The ORR of first-line crizotinib was 54.7%. The ORR of sequential alectinib was 73.6%, and 90.5% of patients showed further tumor shrinkage after the alectinib treatment. The median progression-free survival was not reached, and 90.5% of patients were still enrolled in the study at the last follow-up. Among them, 34.0% of patients switched to alectinib treatment due to the toxicity. Crizotinib was associated with a higher frequency of AEs of grades 3 and 4 than alectinib (15.1% vs. 0%). Neither group had any AEs resulting in death.

Conclusions

Switching to alectinib might be an option for patients who do not experience disease progression with initial crizotinib therapy, and may promote better treatment compliance.

SUBMITTER: Pan Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8267309 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background:The phase III ALEX study in patients with treatment-naive advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase mutation-positive (ALK+) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) met its primary end point of improved progression-free survival (PFS) with alectinib versus crizotinib. Here, we present detailed central nervous system (CNS) efficacy data from ALEX. Patients and methods:Overall, 303 patients aged ?18?years underwent 1:1 randomization to receive twice-daily doses of alectinib 600?mg or crizotinib 250?mg. Brain imaging was conducted in all patients at baseline and every subsequent 8?weeks. End points (analyzed by subgroup: patients with/without baseline CNS metastases; patients with/without prior radiotherapy) included PFS, CNS objective response rate (ORR), and time to CNS progression. Results:In total, 122 patients had Independent Review Committee-assessed baseline CNS metastases (alectinib, n?=?64; crizotinib, n?=?58), 43 had measurable lesions (alectinib, n?=?21; crizotinib, n?=?22), and 46 had received prior radiotherapy (alectinib, n?=?25; crizotinib, n?=?21). Investigator-assessed PFS with alectinib was consistent between patients with baseline CNS metastases [hazard ratio (HR) 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.25-0.64] and those without (HR 0.51, 95% CI: 0.33-0.80, P interaction = 0.36). Similar results were seen in patients regardless of prior radiotherapy. Time to CNS progression was significantly longer with alectinib versus crizotinib and comparable between patients with and without baseline CNS metastases (P?<?0.0001). CNS ORR was 85.7% with alectinib versus 71.4% with crizotinib in patients who received prior radiotherapy and 78.6% versus 40.0%, respectively, in those who had not. Conclusion:Alectinib demonstrated superior CNS activity and significantly delayed CNS progression versus crizotinib in patients with previously untreated, advanced ALK+ NSCLC, irrespective of prior CNS disease or radiotherapy. Clinical trial registration:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02075840.

Project description:Background:This is the first trial to directly compare efficacy and safety of alectinib versus standard chemotherapy in advanced/metastatic anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who have progressed on, or were intolerant to, crizotinib. Patients and methods:ALUR (MO29750; NCT02604342) was a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III trial of alectinib versus chemotherapy in advanced/metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC patients previously treated with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy and crizotinib. Patients were randomized 2 : 1 to receive alectinib 600?mg twice daily or chemotherapy (pemetrexed 500?mg/m2 or docetaxel 75?mg/m2, both every 3?weeks) until disease progression, death, or withdrawal. Primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Results:Altogether, 107 patients were randomized (alectinib, n?=?72; chemotherapy, n?=?35) in 13 countries across Europe and Asia. Median investigator-assessed PFS was 9.6?months [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.9-12.2] with alectinib and 1.4?months (95% CI: 1.3-1.6) with chemotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) 0.15 (95% CI: 0.08-0.29); P?<?0.001]. Independent Review Committee-assessed PFS was also significantly longer with alectinib [HR 0.32 (95% CI: 0.17-0.59); median PFS was 7.1?months (95% CI: 6.3-10.8) with alectinib and 1.6?months (95% CI: 1.3-4.1) with chemotherapy]. In patients with measurable baseline central nervous system (CNS) disease (alectinib, n?=?24; chemotherapy, n?=?16), CNS objective response rate was significantly higher with alectinib (54.2%) versus chemotherapy (0%; P?<?0.001). Grade ?3 adverse events were more common with chemotherapy (41.2%) than alectinib (27.1%). Incidence of AEs leading to study-drug discontinuation was lower with alectinib (5.7%) than chemotherapy (8.8%), despite alectinib treatment duration being longer (20.1?weeks versus 6.0?weeks). Conclusion:Alectinib significantly improved systemic and CNS efficacy versus chemotherapy for crizotinib-pretreated ALK-positive NSCLC patients, with a favorable safety profile. Trial registration:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02604342; Roche study MO29750.

Project description:BackgroundProgrammed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is associated with clinical outcomes of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, whether PD-L1 expression plays a role in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive lung ADC is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the impact of PD-L1 in patients with ALK-positive lung ADC receiving crizotinib.Materials and methodsPD-L1 expression was identified by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction was used for ALK variant detection, and immunofluorescence-based multiplex staining was applied for exploring immune cells in tumor microenvironments.ResultsA total of 78 patients with ALK-positive advanced ADC were enrolled in our study, of whom 52 received crizotinib. Compared with EGFR/ALK wild-type tumors, PD-L1 expression was lower in ALK-positive ADC. ALK fusion variants were identified in 32 patients, and those with variant 3 and 5 (short variants) had higher PD-L1 expression than those with other variants. The crizotinib objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) was better in tumors with negative PD-L1 expression (ORR/PFS in PD-L1 0% vs. 1%-49% vs. 50%-100%: 60.7%/11.8 months vs. 38.5%/6.5 months vs. 36.4%/4.0 months, p = .007/.022). The multivariate Cox proportional hazards model revealed that PD-L1 0% (vs. ≥1%) was an independent factor for longer PFS (adjusted hazard ratio 0.322, 95% confidence interval 0.160-0.650, p = .002). Multiplex IHC in three cases showed a varied extent of immune cell infiltrations in tumors with different PD-L1 expression.ConclusionPositive PD-L1 expression was associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes in patients with ALK-positive lung ADC receiving crizotinib.Implications for practiceNot all lung adenocarcinoma with sensitizing driver mutations experienced durable responses to small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Similar to the negative impact of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in epidermal growth factor receptor mutant tumors treated with TKIs, this study demonstrated that positive PD-L1 expression was also associated with worse response rate and shorter progression-free survival of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive adenocarcinoma treated with crizotinib. Among different ALK fusion partners, tumors with short variants (V3 and V5) had higher PD-L1 compared with long variants (V1, V2, and V6). Testing PD-L1 before initiating crizotinib for ALK-positive lung cancer could be a simple method to provide important prognostic information.