Dataset Information

Deep learning-based reconstruction may improve non-contrast cerebral CT imaging compared to other current reconstruction algorithms.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

To evaluate image quality and reconstruction times of a commercial deep learning reconstruction algorithm (DLR) compared to hybrid-iterative reconstruction (Hybrid-IR) and model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) algorithms for cerebral non-contrast CT (NCCT).

Methods

Cerebral NCCT acquisitions of 50 consecutive patients were reconstructed using DLR, Hybrid-IR and MBIR with a clinical CT system. Image quality, in terms of six subjective characteristics (noise, sharpness, grey-white matter differentiation, artefacts, natural appearance and overall image quality), was scored by five observers. As objective metrics of image quality, the noise magnitude and signal-difference-to-noise ratio (SDNR) of the grey and white matter were calculated. Mean values for the image quality characteristics scored by the observers were estimated using a general linear model to account for multiple readers. The estimated means for the reconstruction methods were pairwise compared. Calculated measures were compared using paired t tests.

Results

For all image quality characteristics, DLR images were scored significantly higher than MBIR images. Compared to Hybrid-IR, perceived noise and grey-white matter differentiation were better with DLR, while no difference was detected for other image quality characteristics. Noise magnitude was lower for DLR compared to Hybrid-IR and MBIR (5.6, 6.4 and 6.2, respectively) and SDNR higher (2.4, 1.9 and 2.0, respectively). Reconstruction times were 27 s, 44 s and 176 s for Hybrid-IR, DLR and MBIR respectively.

Conclusions

With a slight increase in reconstruction time, DLR results in lower noise and improved tissue differentiation compared to Hybrid-IR. Image quality of MBIR is significantly lower compared to DLR with much longer reconstruction times.

Key points

• Deep learning reconstruction of cerebral non-contrast CT results in lower noise and improved tissue differentiation compared to hybrid-iterative reconstruction. • Deep learning reconstruction of cerebral non-contrast CT results in better image quality in all aspects evaluated compared to model-based iterative reconstruction. • Deep learning reconstruction only needs a slight increase in reconstruction time compared to hybrid-iterative reconstruction, while model-based iterative reconstruction requires considerably longer processing time.

SUBMITTER: Oostveen LJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8270865 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTo compare a deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) algorithm for pediatric abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) with filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms.Materials and methodsPost-contrast abdominopelvic CT scans obtained from 120 pediatric patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 8.7 ± 5.2 years; 60 males) between May 2020 and October 2020 were evaluated in this retrospective study. Images were reconstructed using FBP, a hybrid IR algorithm (ASiR-V) with blending factors of 50% and 100% (AV50 and AV100, respectively), and a DLR algorithm (TrueFidelity) with three strength levels (low, medium, and high). Noise power spectrum (NPS) and edge rise distance (ERD) were used to evaluate noise characteristics and spatial resolution, respectively. Image noise, edge definition, overall image quality, lesion detectability and conspicuity, and artifacts were qualitatively scored by two pediatric radiologists, and the scores of the two reviewers were averaged. A repeated-measures analysis of variance followed by the Bonferroni post-hoc test was used to compare NPS and ERD among the six reconstruction methods. The Friedman rank sum test followed by the Nemenyi-Wilcoxon-Wilcox all-pairs test was used to compare the results of the qualitative visual analysis among the six reconstruction methods.ResultsThe NPS noise magnitude of AV100 was significantly lower than that of the DLR, whereas the NPS peak of AV100 was significantly higher than that of the high- and medium-strength DLR (p < 0.001). The NPS average spatial frequencies were higher for DLR than for ASiR-V (p < 0.001). ERD was shorter with DLR than with ASiR-V and FBP (p < 0.001). Qualitative visual analysis revealed better overall image quality with high-strength DLR than with ASiR-V (p < 0.001).ConclusionFor pediatric abdominopelvic CT, the DLR algorithm may provide improved noise characteristics and better spatial resolution than the hybrid IR algorithm.

Project description:Purpose. Previous studies have proposed deep-learning techniques to reconstruct CT images from sinograms. However, these techniques employ large fully-connected (FC) layers for projection-to-image domain transformation, producing large models requiring substantial computation power, potentially exceeding the computation memory limit. Our previous work proposed a geometry-guided-deep-learning (GDL) technique for CBCT reconstruction that reduces model size and GPU memory consumption. This study further develops the technique and proposes a novel multi-beamlet deep learning (GMDL) technique of improved performance. The study compares the proposed technique with the FC layer-based deep learning (FCDL) method and the GDL technique through low-dose real-patient CT image reconstruction.Methods. Instead of using a large FC layer, the GMDL technique learns the projection-to-image domain transformation by constructing many small FC layers. In addition to connecting each pixel in the projection domain to beamlet points along the central beamlet in the image domain as GDL does, these smaller FC layers in GMDL connect each pixel to beamlets peripheral to the central beamlet based on the CT projection geometry. We compare ground truth images with low-dose images reconstructed with the GMDL, the FCDL, the GDL, and the conventional FBP methods. The images are quantitatively analyzed in terms of peak-signal-to-noise-ratio (PSNR), structural-similarity-index-measure (SSIM), and root-mean-square-error (RMSE).Results. Compared to other methods, the GMDL reconstructed low-dose CT images show improved image quality in terms of PSNR, SSIM, and RMSE. The optimal number of peripheral beamlets for the GMDL technique is two beamlets on each side of the central beamlet. The model size and memory consumption of the GMDL model is less than 1/100 of the FCDL model.Conclusion. Compared to the FCDL method, the GMDL technique is demonstrated to be able to reconstruct real patient low-dose CT images of improved image quality with significantly reduced model size and GPU memory requirement.

Project description:ObjectiveFew studies have explored the clinical feasibility of using deep-learning reconstruction to reduce the radiation dose of CT. We aimed to compare the image quality and lung nodule detectability between chest CT using a quarter of the low dose (QLD) reconstructed with vendor-agnostic deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and conventional low-dose (LD) CT reconstructed with iterative reconstruction (IR).Materials and methodsWe retrospectively collected 100 patients (median age, 61 years [IQR, 53-70 years]) who received LDCT using a dual-source scanner, where total radiation was split into a 1:3 ratio. QLD CT was generated using a quarter dose and reconstructed with DLIR (QLD-DLIR), while LDCT images were generated using a full dose and reconstructed with IR (LD-IR). Three thoracic radiologists reviewed subjective noise, spatial resolution, and overall image quality, and image noise was measured in five areas. The radiologists were also asked to detect all Lung-RADS category 3 or 4 nodules, and their performance was evaluated using area under the jackknife free-response receiver operating characteristic curve (AUFROC).ResultsThe median effective dose was 0.16 (IQR, 0.14-0.18) mSv for QLD CT and 0.65 (IQR, 0.57-0.71) mSv for LDCT. The radiologists' evaluations showed no significant differences in subjective noise (QLD-DLIR vs. LD-IR, lung-window setting; 3.23 ± 0.19 vs. 3.27 ± 0.22; P = .11), spatial resolution (3.14 ± 0.28 vs. 3.16 ± 0.27; P = .12), and overall image quality (3.14 ± 0.21 vs. 3.17 ± 0.17; P = .15). QLD-DLIR demonstrated lower measured noise than LD-IR in most areas (P < .001 for all). No significant difference was found between QLD-DLIR and LD-IR for the sensitivity (76.4% vs. 72.2%; P = .35) or the AUFROCs (0.77 vs. 0.78; P = .68) in detecting Lung-RADS category 3 or 4 nodules. Under a noninferiority limit of -0.1, QLD-DLIR showed noninferior detection performance (95% CI for AUFROC difference, -0.04 to 0.06).ConclusionQLD-DLIR images showed comparable image quality and noninferior nodule detectability relative to LD-IR images.