Dataset Information

Normal reference intervals of prognostic nutritional index in healthy adults: A large multi-center observational study from Western China.

ABSTRACT:

Background

It has been widely reported that the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) played a pivotal role in nutritional assessment of surgical patients and tumor prognosis. In order to improve the accuracy of evaluation in Western China, we established reference intervals (RIs) of PNI in healthy controls.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study on healthy ethnic Han adults (18-79 years) was conducted to explore the influences of age, gender, study centers, and instruments on PNI and to establish RIs. The data came from a healthy routine examination center database and laboratory information system (LIS) of four centers in Western China, and there were 200 persons selected randomly for verification of RIs.

Results

Five thousand eight hundred and thirty-nine healthy candidates were enrolled. PNI showed a marked gender dependence, and males had significantly higher PNI than females across all ages (p < 0.01). We found that PNI is significantly different between age groups (p < 0.01), the value of PNI tended to decrease with age increasing. There is also an obvious influence of centers and instruments on PNI (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

We established reference intervals of PNI in healthy Han Chinese population in Western China and validated successfully. Further established RIs will lead to better standardizations of PNI for clinical applications.

SUBMITTER: Yang G

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8274996 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionAccurate clinical laboratory reference values derived from a local or regional population base are required to correctly interpret laboratory results. In Botswana, most reference intervals used to date are not standardized across clinical laboratories and are based on values derived from populations in the United States or Western Europe.MethodsWe measured 14 hematologic and biochemical parameters of healthy young adults screened for participation in the Botswana HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Study using tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) (TDF2 Study). Reference intervals were calculated using standard methods, stratified by gender, and compared with the site-derived reference values used for the TDF2 study (BOTUSA ranges), the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) Grading Table for Adverse Events, the Botswana public health laboratories, and other regional references.ResultsOut of 2533 screened participants, 1786 met eligibility criteria for participation in study and were included in the analysis. Our reference values were comparable to those of the Botswana public health system except for amylase, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), phosphate, total and direct bilirubin. Compared to our reference values, BOTUSA reference ranges would have classified participants as out of range for some analytes, with amylase (50.8%) and creatinine (32.0%) producing the highest out of range values. Applying the DAIDS toxicity grading system to the values would have resulted in 45 and 18 participants as having severe or life threatening values for amylase and hemoglobin, respectively.ConclusionOur reference values illustrate the differences in hematological and biochemical analyte ranges between African and Western populations. Thus, the use of western-derived reference laboratory values to screen a group of Batswana adults resulted in many healthy people being classified as having out-of-range blood analytes. The need to establish accurate local or regional reference values is apparent and we hope our results can be used to that end in Botswana.

Project description:BackgroundThyroid hormones are essential for early neurocognitive development and growth and development in childhood and adolescence. However, the reference intervals (RIs) for thyroid hormones in Chinese pediatric individuals remain unclear. This study aimed to establish thyroid hormone RIs for a Chinese pediatric population according to appropriate age- and sex-specific partitioning.MethodsIn this prospective observational study, a total of 1,279 healthy children (singletons, aged from 1 day to 12 years) were recruited, and serum samples were analyzed on a Mindray automated chemiluminescence immunoassay analyzer CL-6000i for thyroid hormone detection, including thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free triiodothyronine (FT3), free thyroxine (FT4), total triiodothyronine (T3), and total thyroxine (T4). Age and sex-specific RIs were established, and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated in accordance with the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) document C28-A3 guidelines.ResultsQuantile testing revealed that the median (P50) and RIs [2.5th percentile (P2.5)-97.5th percentile (P97.5)] for TSH, FT3, T3, and T4 of males differed significantly from those of females (P<0.05), except for FT4 (P=0.483). For FT3 and T3, the RIs of males were higher than that of females, and the RI of T4 for males was narrower and higher than that of females [P2.5-P97.5: 72.33-171.60 vs. 72.31-176.27 nmol/L; P50: 116.75 vs. 113.47 nmol/L, P=0.011]. RIs for TSH, FT3, FT4, T3, and T4 showed sex- and age-specific properties and displayed a wide variation during the first month of life but gradually narrowed and concentrated with increasing age. In addition, RIs of TSH, FT3, FT4, and T3 in males differed significantly from females in the first month of life (TSH: 1.46-10.87 vs. 1.08-11.35 mIU/L; FT3: 2.96-7.08 vs. 2.35-7.27 pmol/L, FT4: 13.34-28.65 vs. 13.82-31.83 pmol/L; T3: 0.83-2.33 vs. 0.72-2.46 nmol/L). The RI of T4 also exhibited a difference between males and females in the 9- to 12-year age group (59.31-150.72 vs. 63.29-146.94 pmol/L for males and females, respectively).ConclusionsPediatric RIs of thyroid hormones display age- and sex-specific trends. The RIs established in this study will improve the accuracy of TSH assay result interpretations and clinical decision-making in clinical laboratories that utilize the Mindray analytical platform.

Project description:Important differences have been demonstrated in laboratory parameters from healthy persons in different geographical regions and populations, mostly driven by a combination of genetic, demographic, nutritional, and environmental factors. Despite this, European and North American derived laboratory reference intervals are used in African countries for patient management, clinical trial eligibility, and toxicity determination; which can result in misclassification of healthy persons as having laboratory abnormalities.An observational prospective cohort study known as the Kisumu Incidence Cohort Study (KICoS) was conducted to estimate the incidence of HIV seroconversion and identify determinants of successful recruitment and retention in preparation for an HIV vaccine/prevention trial among young adults and adolescents in western Kenya. Laboratory values generated from the KICoS were compared to published region-specific reference intervals and the 2004 NIH DAIDS toxicity tables used for the trial.About 1106 participants were screened for the KICoS between January 2007 and June 2010. Nine hundred and fifty-three participants aged 16 to 34 years, HIV-seronegative, clinically healthy, and non-pregnant were selected for this analysis. Median and 95% reference intervals were calculated for hematological and biochemistry parameters. When compared with both published region-specific reference values and the 2004 NIH DAIDS toxicity table, it was shown that the use of locally established reference intervals would have resulted in fewer participants classified as having abnormal hematological or biochemistry values compared to US derived reference intervals from DAIDS (10% classified as abnormal by local parameters vs. >40% by US DAIDS). Blood urea nitrogen was most often out of range if US based intervals were used: <10% abnormal by local intervals compared to >83% by US based reference intervals.Differences in reference intervals for hematological and biochemical parameters between western and African populations highlight importance of developing local reference intervals for clinical care and trials in Africa.

Project description:Background Clinical chemistry reference intervals are important tools for health evaluation, diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring adverse events. Currently used reference intervals in most African countries including Ethiopia are mainly derived from Western populations, despite studies reporting differences that could lead to incorrect clinical decisions. The aim of this study was to establish reference intervals for commonly used clinical chemistry parameters for healthy adults in Northeast Ethiopia. Methods A community based cross-sectional study was conducted among 328 apparently healthy adults between the ages of 18 and 57 years. Blood samples were collected for clinical chemistry analysis using Dirui CS-T240 auto-analyzer and serological testing to screen the population. Medians and 95% reference intervals were computed using non-parametric method according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guideline. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare reference values between males and females. Results Reference intervals established were: ALT 11.2–48.0 U/L, AST 16–60 U/L, ALP 53–342.3 U/L, total protein 5.4–8.9 mg/dL, total bilirubin 0.1–1.23 mg/dL, glucose 65–125 mg/dL, total cholesterol 69–213 mg/dL, triglycerides 46–207 mg/dL, creatinine 0.3–1.2 mg/dL and urea 9.5–46.3 mg/dL. Significant sex-differences were observed for ALT, AST, ALP, total cholesterol, triglycerides, creatinine and urea. We found that the established reference intervals substantially differ from the reference ranges currently in use. Up to 43.1% of apparently healthy adults are considered as having abnormal test values on the bases of the currently in use reference ranges. If the reference values from the United States based intervals were applied to the study population, 81.8% would have been classified as having abnormal laboratory test results. Conclusions Local population-specific reference intervals were established for commonly used clinical chemistry parameters in adult population of Northeast Ethiopia. Although further study is needed, these reference intervals may have the potential to facility the decision-making process based on laboratory test results in this population.

Project description:BackgroundAbnormal intra-pregnancy haematological variables are associated with adverse feto-maternal outcomes. However, the reference intervals (RIs) employed in sub-Saharan Africa to inform clinical decisions are generally imported. Since RIs are influenced by age, geographical location, and race, we hypothesized that context specific RIs should be established in Ghana to contextualize intra-pregnancy decision making.MethodsThis cross-sectional study retrospectively retrieved data of 333 pregnant women with no known clinically determined intra-pregnancy complications; 22 participants in their first trimester (T1; 1-13 weeks), 177 in their T2 (14-27 weeks), and 132 in T3 (28-41 weeks). RIs for haematological parameters were non-parametrically determined at 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles in accordance with CLSI guidance document EP28-A3c. Two-sample comparisons were undertaken using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests whereas more than two-sample comparisons were undertaken using Kruskal-Wallis test. Statistical significance was set at p <0.05 under the two-tailed assumptions.ResultsIn accordance with WHO trimester-specific haemoglobin cutoffs, anaemia prevalence was a moderate (T1: 36.4%; 8/22 & T2: 31.6%; 56/177) to severe (T3:68.0%; 90/132) public health problem. Additionally, 9.3% (31/333) individuals had high gestational haemoglobin levels (Hb >13.0 g/dL). Moreover, haemoglobin (T2: 8.6-14.3 vs T3: 7.5-13.6 g/dL), MCH (T2: 22.5-69.8 vs T3: 21.6-31.9 pg), MCHC (T2: 30.2-51.8 g/L vs T3: 30.5-37.9 g/L), TWBC (T2: 4.0-13.4 vs T3: 4.1-13.0 x 109/L) required trimester specific RIs, compared to RBC (2.8-5.1 x 1012/L), MCV (66.2-100.2 fL), and platelet counts (106.3-388.3 x 109/L) that each required combined reference intervals.ConclusionsThe intra-pregnancy haematological RIs determined have appreciable lower limits; there is the need to determine context-specific thresholds for haematological variables predictive of positive and/or adverse maternal and infant health outcomes.