Dataset Information

Flash glucose monitoring with the FreeStyle Libre 2 compared with self-monitoring of blood glucose in suboptimally controlled type 1 diabetes: the FLASH-UK randomised controlled trial protocol.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Optimising glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes (T1D) remains challenging. Flash glucose monitoring with FreeStyle Libre 2 (FSL2) is a novel alternative to the current standard of care self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). No randomised controlled trials to date have explored the potential benefits of FSL2 in T1D. We aim to assess the impact of FSL2 in people with suboptimal glycaemic control T1D in comparison with SMBG.

Methods

This open-label, multicentre, randomised (via stochastic minimisation), parallel design study conducted at eight UK secondary and primary care centres will aim to recruit 180 people age ≥16 years with T1D for >1 year and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) 7.5%-11%. Eligible participants will be randomised to 24 weeks of FSL2 (intervention) or SMBG (control) periods, after 2-week of blinded sensor wear. Participants will be assessed virtually or in-person owing to the COVID-19 pandemic. HbA1c will be measured at baseline, 12 and 24 weeks (primary outcome). Participants will be contacted at 4 and 12 weeks for glucose optimisation. Control participants will wear a blinded sensor during the last 2 weeks. Psychosocial outcomes will be measured at baseline and 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes include sensor-based metrics, insulin doses, adverse events and self-report psychosocial measures. Utility, acceptability, expectations and experience of using FSL2 will be explored. Data on health service resource utilisation will be collected.

Analysis

Efficacy analyses will follow intention-to-treat principle. Outcomes will be analysed using analysis of covariance, adjusted for the baseline value of the corresponding outcome, minimisation factors and other known prognostic factors. Both within-trial and life-time economic evaluations, informed by modelling from the perspective of the National Health Service setting, will be performed.

Ethics

The study was approved by Greater Manchester West Research Ethics Committee (reference 19/NW/0081). Informed consent will be sought from all participants.

Trial registration number

NCT03815006.

Protocol version

4.0 dated 29 June 2020.

SUBMITTER: Wilmot EG

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8280849 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:The diagnosis of hyperglycaemia in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is challenging. Blood glucose levels obtained during oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) may not reflect home glycaemic profiles. We compare OGTT results with home glycaemic profiles obtained using the FreeStyle Libre continuous glucose monitoring device (FSL-CGM). METHODS:Twenty-eight women (20 with gestational diabetes [GDM], 8 controls) were recruited following OGTT between 24 and 28?weeks of gestation. All women wore the FSL-CGM device for 48-96?h at home in early third trimester, and recorded a meal diary. OGTT was repeated on the final day of FSL-CGM recording. OGTT results were compared with ambulatory glycaemic variables, and repeat OGTT was undertaken whilst wearing FSL-CGM to determine accuracy of the device. RESULTS:FSL-CGM results were available for 27/28 women with mean data capture 92.8%. There were significant differences in the ambulatory fasting, post-prandial peaks, and mean glucose between controls in whom both primary and secondary OGTT was normal (n?=?6) and those with two abnormal OGTTs or "true" GDM (n?=?7). There was no difference in ambulatory mean glucose between these controls and the 13 women who had an abnormal primary OGTT and normal repeat OGTT. These participants had significantly lower body mass index (BMI) than the true GDM group (29.0 Vs 36.3?kg/m2, p-value 0.014). Paired OGTT/FSL-CGM readings revealed a Mean Absolute difference (MAD) -0.58?mmol/L and Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) -11.9%. Bland-Altman plot suggests FSL-CGM underestimated blood glucose by approximately 0.78?mmol/L. CONCLUSION:Diagnosis of GDM on a single OGTT identifies a proportion of women who do not have a significantly higher home glucose levels than controls. This raises questions about factors which may affect the reproducibility of OGTT in this population, including food insecurity and atypical phenotypes of diabetes. More investigation is needed to understand the suitability of the OGTT as a diagnostic test in sub-Saharan Africa.

Project description:IntroductionGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a glucose intolerance occurring in 3%-10% of pregnant women and being a risk factor for multiple maternal and fetal complications. The risk of perinatal complications is proportional to the level of maternal hyperglycaemia. Proper glycaemic control is therefore one of the key elements of GDM therapy. Until recently, determination of blood glucose concentration was performed using glucose meters, which involved multiple fingerpricks. Nowadays, due to the flash glucose monitoring (FGM) availability, it is possible to collect measurements at any time without routine puncturing. The aim of the presented study is to assess the impact of FGM on the efficacy of treatment in population of patients diagnosed with GDM.Methods and analysisThis is a prospective, randomised study, that will recruit 100 women at 24-28 weeks of gestation at the 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland. Women diagnosed with GDM, who will meet the inclusion criteria, will be individually randomised to the FGM or self-monitoring of blood glucose groups. Further on, clinical and laboratory results of the mother and their newborns will be collected for analysis during the course of pregnancy. Primary outcome is mean glycaemia result in each group after 1 month analysis and percentage of results in the target glycaemic range. The secondary objectives will be to compare the two groups for maternal and neonatal outcomes in conjunction with long-term glycaemic control using blood glycated haemoglobin and fructosamine serum concentrations.Ethics and disseminationThe study is exempt from regional ethics review due to its nature of quality improvement in patient care. The study has been approved by the Bioethics Committee at the Medical University of Warsaw and the patient privacy protection boards governing over the recruitment sites. Results of the study will be presented in peer-reviewed journals and at conferences.Trial registration numberNCT04422821.