Dataset Information

KLRD1, FOSL2 and LILRB3 as potential biomarkers for plaques progression in acute myocardial infarction and stable coronary artery disease.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Myocardial infarction (MI) contributes to high mortality and morbidity and can also accelerate atherosclerosis, thus inducing recurrent event due to status changing of coronary artery walls or plaques. The research aimed to investigate the differentially expressed genes (DEGs), which may be potential therapeutic targets for plaques progression in stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and ST-elevated MI (STEMI).

Methods

Two human datasets (GSE56885 and GSE59867) were analyzed by GEO2R and enrichment analysis was applied through Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis. To explore the seed genes, the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed and seed genes, as well as top30 ranking neighbours were screened out. To validate these findings, one human dataset GSE120521 was analyzed. Linear regression analysis and ROC curve were also performed to determine which seed genes above mentioned could be independent factors for plaques progression. Mice MI model and ELISA of seed genes were applied and ROC curve was also performed for in vivo validation.

Results

169 DEGs and 573 DEGs were screened out in GSE56885 and GSE59867, respectively. Utilizing GO and KEGG analysis, these DEGs mainly enriched in immune system response and cytokines interaction. PPI network analysis was carried out and 19 seed genes were screened out. To validate these findings, GSE120521 was analyzed and three genes were demonstrated to be targets for plaques progression and stable CAD progression, including KLRD1, FOSL2 and LILRB3. KLRD1 and LILRB3 were demonstrated to be high-expressed at 1d after MI compared to SHAM group and FOSL2 expression was low-expressed at 1d and 1w. To investigate the diagnostic abilities of seed genes, ROC analysis was applied and the AUCs of KLRD1, FOSL2 and LILRB3, were 0.771, 0.938 and 0.972, respectively.

Conclusion

This study provided the screened seed genes, KLRD1, FOSL2 and LILRB3, as credible molecular biomarkers for plaques status changing in CAD progression and MI recurrence. Other seed genes, such as FOS, SOCS3 and MCL1, may also be potential targets for treatment due to their special clinical value in cardiovascular diseases.

SUBMITTER: Zhang Q

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8285847 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:The objective of our study was to evaluate the concentrations of pro-inflammatory biomarkers in patients with acute myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) compared to patients with acute myocardial infarction with obstructive coronary arteries (MI-CAD) in the early post-infarction period and after 1 year and to perform a comparative analysis of the relationship between laboratory biomarkers and atherosclerosis progression in patients with MINOCA and MI-CAD.MethodsSamples of peripheral venous blood were collected upon admission and on days 2, 4, and 7 of hospitalization and after 1 year. An extended multiplex analysis was performed in blood serum. Multidetector-computed tomography coronary angiography was performed on day 7 and 1 year after acute myocardial infarction to assess the progression of atherosclerosis.ResultsThe level of high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) was elevated upon admission in MINOCA patients compared to MI-CAD patients (p = 0.05), but it was comparable in two groups at other time points and did not exceed the reference range after 1 year. Despite comparable levels of cytokines CXCL-6, LIGHT, CCL-8, and endocan-1 in patients in both groups, MINOCA patients had a greater increase in pro-inflammatory cytokines PlGF, oncostatin M, IL-20, and CCL-15 sVCAM-1 in the early post-infarction period and in CCL-21, sVCAM-1, oncostatin M, and PlGF after 1 year. We observed significant differences in the dynamics of the following biomarkers between patients with MI-CAD and MINOCA: the dynamics of concentrations of CCL21 (p = 0.002), LIGHT (p = 0.03), and endocan-1 (p = 0.03) after 1 year compared to day 1 in MI-CAD and MINOCA patients was opposite, while the dynamics of CXCL6 (p = 0.04) and endocan-1 (p = 0.02) differed between groups when evaluated after 1 year compared to day 7 of the early post-infarction period. In the MINOCA group, factors associated with atherosclerosis progression were concentrations of sVCAM-1 and CCL-21, while in the MI-CAD group, concentrations of CCL-8 and CXCL6 were the main determinants of atherosclerosis progression.ConclusionsThis small study showed that MINOCA and MI-CAD patients exhibited differences in a pro-inflammatory biomarker profile in the early post-infarction period and after 1-year follow-up, which implies distinct inflammatory pathways involved in atherogenesis during MINOCA. The key factors that were associated with atherosclerosis progression in MINOCA patients are sVCAM-1 and CCL-21, which may suggest a complex genesis of atherosclerosis progression due to structurally altered plaques and changes in the microcirculatory bed. In MI-CAD patients, CCL-8 and CXCL-6 were the key biomarkers associated with atherosclerosis progression. Further large-scale studies are required to confirm our data.

Project description:Little is known about cardiac adverse events among patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease (CAD).To compare myocardial infarction (MI) and mortality rates between patients with nonobstructive CAD, obstructive CAD, and no apparent CAD in a national cohort.Retrospective cohort study of all US veterans undergoing elective coronary angiography for CAD between October 2007 and September 2012 in the Veterans Affairs health care system. Patients with prior CAD events were excluded.Angiographic CAD extent, defined by degree (no apparent CAD: no stenosis >20%; nonobstructive CAD: ?1 stenosis ?20% but no stenosis ?70%; obstructive CAD: any stenosis ?70% or left main [LM] stenosis ?50%) and distribution (1, 2, or 3 vessel).The primary outcome was 1-year hospitalization for nonfatal MI after the index angiography. Secondary outcomes included 1-year all-cause mortality and combined 1-year MI and mortality.Among 37,674 patients, 8384 patients (22.3%) had nonobstructive CAD and 20,899 patients (55.4%) had obstructive CAD. Within 1 year, 845 patients died and 385 were rehospitalized for MI. Among patients with no apparent CAD, the 1-year MI rate was 0.11% (n?=?8, 95% CI, 0.10%-0.20%) and increased progressively by 1-vessel nonobstructive CAD, 0.24% (n?=?10, 95% CI, 0.10%-0.40%); 2-vessel nonobstructive CAD, 0.56% (n?=?13, 95% CI, 0.30%-1.00%); 3-vessel nonobstructive CAD, 0.59% (n?=?6, 95% CI, 0.30%-1.30%); 1-vessel obstructive CAD, 1.18% (n?=?101, 95% CI, 1.00%-1.40%); 2-vessel obstructive CAD, 2.18% (n?=?110, 95% CI, 1.80%-2.60%); and 3-vessel or LM obstructive CAD, 2.47% (n?=?137, 95% CI, 2.10%-2.90%). After adjustment, 1-year MI rates increased with increasing CAD extent. Relative to patients with no apparent CAD, patients with 1-vessel nonobstructive CAD had a hazard ratio (HR) for 1-year MI of 2.0 (95% CI, 0.8-5.1); 2-vessel nonobstructive HR, 4.6 (95% CI, 2.0-10.5); 3-vessel nonobstructive HR, 4.5 (95% CI, 1.6-12.5); 1-vessel obstructive HR, 9.0 (95% CI, 4.2-19.0); 2-vessel obstructive HR, 16.5 (95% CI, 8.1-33.7); and 3-vessel or LM obstructive HR, 19.5 (95% CI, 9.9-38.2). One-year mortality rates were associated with increasing CAD extent, ranging from 1.38% among patients without apparent CAD to 4.30% with 3-vessel or LM obstructive CAD. After risk adjustment, there was no significant association between 1- or 2-vessel nonobstructive CAD and mortality, but there were significant associations with mortality for 3-vessel nonobstructive CAD (HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.5), 1-vessel obstructive CAD (HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.4-2.6), 2-vessel obstructive CAD (HR, 2.8; 95% CI, 2.1-3.7), and 3-vessel or LM obstructive CAD (HR, 3.4; 95% CI, 2.6-4.4). Similar associations were noted with the combined outcome.In this cohort of patients undergoing elective coronary angiography, nonobstructive CAD, compared with no apparent CAD, was associated with a significantly greater 1-year risk of MI and all-cause mortality. These findings suggest clinical importance of nonobstructive CAD and warrant further investigation of interventions to improve outcomes among these patients.