Dataset Information

The changing landscape of anti-lymphoma drug clinical trials in mainland China in the past 15 years (2005-2020): A systematic review.

ABSTRACT:

Background

To depict a comprehensive changing landscape of anti-lymphoma drug clinical trials in mainland China from 2005 to 2020.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted on the China National Medical Products Administration Center for Drug Evaluation platform, the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry and ClinicalTrials.gov websites.

Findings

A total of 797 anti-lymphoma drug clinical trials registered from Jan 1st, 2005 to Aug 1st, 2020 were identified. The number of trials increased gradually over time, and a notable increase was observed in 2016, with the number growing from 29 in 2015 to 72 in 2016. Trials in phase I (26•1%) and phase II (26•6%) represented the majority, followed by phase III (12•5%) and phase IV (7•4%). Regarding sponsorship, industry-sponsored trials (53•2%) accounted for a slightly larger proportion than investigator-initiated trials (IITs) (46•8%). A dramatic growth for IITs was seen during 2017-2020, with the number increasing from 36 in 2017 to 96 in 2020. Additionally, the proportion of trials involving targeted agents (50•2%) accounted for the largest, followed by trials involving immunotherapy agents (41•0%), and cytotoxic agents (8•0%). Besides, a sustainable growth was observed in the number of leading anti-lymphoma drug clinical trial units in mainland China over the past 15 years. The majority of leading principal units (60•8%) were from Beijing, Shanghai, Guangdong and Jiangsu.

Interpretation

In the past 15 years, the research and development of drugs and clinical trials for lymphoma in mainland China has achieved much progression. Future efforts are needed for improving innovation and sustainability of pharmaceutical research and development.

Funding

China National Major Project for New Drug Innovation (2017ZX09304015); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) (2016-I2M-1-001).

SUBMITTER: Chen H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8315394 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundIn recent years, new drug development on lung cancer is in full swing in China. The aim of this study was to overview the changing landscape of anti-lung cancer drug clinical trials in mainland China from 2005 to 2020.MethodsWe analysed anti-lung cancer drug clinical trials registered on three websites including the China National Medical Products Administration Centre for Drug Evaluation platform, the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry and ClinicalTrials.gov.FindingsA total of 1595 anti-lung cancer drug clinical trials from Jan 1st, 2005 to Dec 31st, 2020 were extracted, which included 630 (39•5%) investigator-initiated trials (IITs), 698 (43•8%) domestic industry-sponsored trials (ISTs), and 267 (16•7%) international ISTs. During the past 16 years, the number of anti-lung cancer clinical trials including IITs and domestic ISTs had a remarkable growth, however, the number of international ISTs increased slowly. The number of principal clinical trial units also increased significantly over time. Of the 1595 trials, the largest growth was observed in phase I trials during 2013-2020, with an average annual growth rate of 38•6%. 278 trials were led by principal investigators (PI) from Guangdong, followed by Beijing (n=273) and Shanghai (n=257). Among the 965 ISTs, clinical trials involving targeted drugs (588, 60•9%) accounted for the largest proportion, followed by immunotherapeutic drugs (284, 29•4%), cytotoxic drugs (75, 7•8%), and traditional Chinese medicine (18, 1•9%). In terms of targeted drugs, EGFR-TKIs remained the most studied drugs (225/588, 38•27%). As for immunotherapy, 125 out of 284 (44•01%) trials involved PD-1 inhibitors, 60 (21•13%) trials involved PD-L1 inhibitors, and seven (2•46%) trials involved CTLA-4 inhibitors.InterpretationIn the past 16 years, the development of anti-lung cancer drug clinical trials has achieved much progress in mainland China. The most progress lied in targeted therapy and immunotherapy.FundingThis work was financially supported in part by China National Major Project for New Drug Innovation (2017ZX09304015) and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) (2016-I2M-1-001).

Project description:BackgroundWe described participant demographics for National Cancer Institute (NCI) clinical trials at the clinical center (NCI-CC participants) of the National Institutes of Health to identify enrollment disparities.MethodsWe analyzed NCI-CC data from 2005 to 2020, calculated enrollment fractions, compared with the US cancer population represented by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer incidence data (2018) and the Cancer in North America database (2018), and compared further with clinical trial disparities data from the NCI Community Oncology Research Program and National Clinical Trials Network (2005-2019), and from ClinicalTrials.gov (2003-2016).ResultsNCI-CC (38 531 participants) had higher enrollment fractions for older adults (8.5%), male (5.6%), non-Hispanic (5.1%), and Black or African American (5.3%) participants; lower women proportion across race and ethnicity; and fewer female sex-specific cancer (6.8%) than male sex-specific cancer (11.7%) participants. NCI-CC had lower median age than Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (54.0 vs 65.4); more Black or African American participants (12.0% vs 11.1%); and fewer women (41.7% vs 49.5%), White (76.1% vs 80.5%), Asian or Pacific Islander (4.6% vs 6.0%), American Indian or Alaska Native (0.3% vs 0.5%), and Hispanic participants (7.1% vs 13%). NCI-CC had more Black or African American and Asian or Pacific Islander participants; fewer Hispanic participants than the NCI Community Oncology Research Program and National Clinical Trials Network; more Black or African American and Hispanic participants; fewer Asian or Pacific Islander participants than ClinicalTrials.gov data. Improvement was noted for NCI-CC (older adults, Black or African American, Asian or Pacific Islander, Hispanic participants).ConclusionWe found lower representation of older adults, women, Asian or Pacific Islander, American Indian or Alaska Native, and Hispanic participants vs the US cancer population and higher representation of Black or African American vs US cancer population and oncology clinical trials. Multifaceted efforts are underway to reduce disparities in cancer clinical trials at the NCI-CC.

Project description:Background: In 2005, Network for Therapy in Rare Epilepsies (NETRE)-was initiated in order to share treatment experiences among clinicians in patients with rare epilepsies. Here we describe the structure of the rapidly growing NETRE and summarize some of the findings of the last 15 years. Methodology/Structure of NETRE: NETRE is organized in distinct groups (currently >270). Starting point is always a patient with a rare epilepsy/ epileptic disorder. This creates a new group, and next, a medical coordinator is appointed. The exchange of experiences is established using a data entry form, which the coordinator sends to colleagues. The primary aim is to exchange experiences (retrospectively, anonymously, MRI results also non-anonymously) of the epilepsy treatment as well as on clinical presentation and comorbidities NETRE is neither financed nor sponsored. Results: Some of the relevant results: (1) first description of FIRES as a new epilepsy syndrome and its further investigation, (2) in SCN2A, the assignment to gain- vs. loss-of-function mutations has a major impact on clinical decisions to use or avoid treatment with sodium channel blockers, (3) the important aspect of avoiding overtreatment in CDKL5 patients, due to loss of effects of anticonvulsants after 12 months, (4) pathognomonic MRI findings in FOXG1 patients, (5) the first description of pathognomonic chewing-induced seizures in SYNGAP1 patients, and the therapeutic effect of statins as anticonvulsant in these patients, (6) the phenomenon of another reflex epilepsy-bathing epilepsy associated with a SYN1 mutation. Of special interest is also a NETRE group following twins with genetic and/or structural epilepsies [including vanishing-twin-syndrome and twin-twin-transfusion syndrome) [= "Early Neuroimpaired Twin Entity" (ENITE)]. Discussion and Perspective: NETRE enables clinicians to quickly exchange information on therapeutic experiences in rare diseases with colleagues at an international level. For both parents and clinicians/scientist this international exchange is both reassuring and helpful. In collaboration with other groups, personalized therapeutic approaches are sought, but the present limitations of currently available therapies are also highlighted. Presently, the PATRE Project (PATient based phenotyping and evaluation of therapy for Rare Epilepsies) is commencing, in which information on therapies will be obtained directly from patients and their caregivers.