Dataset Information

Beyond Euler/Cardan analysis: True glenohumeral axial rotation during arm elevation and rotation.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Based on Euler/Cardan analysis, prior investigations have reported up to 80° of glenohumeral (GH) external rotation during arm elevation, dependent on the plane of elevation (PoE). However, the subtraction of Euler/Cardan angles does not compute the rotation around the humerus' longitudinal axis (i.e. axial rotation). Clinicians want to understand the true rotation around the humerus' longitudinal axis and rely on laboratories to inform their understanding of underlying shoulder biomechanics, especially for the GH joint since its motion cannot be visually ascertained. True GH axial rotation has not been previously measured in vivo, and its difference from Euler/Cardan (apparent) axial rotation is unknown.

Research question

What is the true GH axial rotation during arm elevation and external rotation, and does it vary from apparent axial rotation and by PoE?

Methods

Twenty healthy subjects (10 M/10 F, ages 22-66) were recorded using biplane fluoroscopy while performing arm elevation in the coronal, scapular and sagittal planes, and external rotation in 0° and 90° of abduction. Apparent GH axial rotation was computed using the xz'y'' and yx'y'' sequences. True GH axial rotation was computed by integrating the projection of GH angular velocity onto the humerus' longitudinal axis. One-dimensional statistical parametric mapping was utilized to compare apparent versus true axial rotation, axial rotation versus 0°, and detect differences in axial rotation by PoE.

Results

In contrast to apparent axial rotation, true GH axial rotation does not differ by PoE and is not different than 0° during arm elevation at higher elevation angles. The spherical area between the sequence-specific and actual humeral trajectory explains the difference between apparent and true axial rotation.

Significance

Proper quantification of axial rotation is important because biomechanics literature informs clinical understanding of shoulder biomechanics. Clinicians care about true axial rotation, which should be reported in future studies of shoulder kinematics.

SUBMITTER: Aliaj K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8316370 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe middle glenohumeral ligament (MGHL) is one of the three ligaments that stabilize the anterior capsule of the shoulder. Recent work suggests that it inserts distally into the deep layer of the subscapularis tendon. The role of the MGHL remains debated. The hypothesis of this study was that the MGHL plays a significant functional role in limiting external rotation of the shoulder while allowing a wide range of motion through its distal insertion into the subscapularis rather than directly onto the humerus.MethodsIn a cadaveric study performed on 20 shoulders (10 subjects), the MGHL and the other anterior structures of the shoulder were successively cut according to a standardized protocol. At each stage, the external rotation range of the shoulder was measured with the arm at the side (ER 1) and in 90° abduction (ER 2) using a goniometer. After dissection, the structure of the MGHL and its distal insertion were analyzed.ResultsCutting the MGHL led to significant increases in ER 1 but not in ER 2. Shoulder range of motion in ER 1 increased on average by 15 ± 5° (P < .001) after cutting the MGHL and by 21 ± 11° (P < .001) after subscapularis peel. The range of motion in ER 2 increased by 3 ± 4° (P = .048) after cutting the MGHL, by 4 ± 6° (P = .02) after subscapularis peel and by 25 ± 8° (P < .001) after cutting the inferior glenohumeral ligament. The MGHL was present in all dissected shoulders. It was leaf-like in 12 cases, cord-like in 6 cases and had a vestigial appearance in 2 cases. The distal insertion was in all cases in the deep layer of the subscapularis in a thickening of the anterior capsule in the superior part of the muscle, except for two cases in which the tendinous part of the subscapularis was also involved.ConclusionThe MGHL limited shoulder external rotation by a similar amount as the subscapularis muscle. Further studies are required to understand the clinical relevance of these findings, notably for the treatment of shoulder stiffness.

Project description:Background The measurement of internal rotation by noting the maximal vertebral level reached by the patient’s thumb behind their back is an established physical examination technique, as outlined in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Assessment Form.7 The purpose of the present study is to correlate real-time glenohumeral internal rotation with thumb to spinous process movement to determine the accuracy of the technique. Methods Healthy volunteers with no previous history of shoulder injury or symptoms were recruited from the local medical school population. Ultrasound probe was placed over the anterolateral shoulder, and relevant anatomy was identified. Internal rotation was evaluated by measuring displacement of the peak of the medial aspect of the bicipital groove relative to the anterior glenoid rim with the arm held in defined positions of progressively increasing internal rotation. The difference in displacement between arm positions was calculated and recorded. Results A total of 20 participants (11 women/9 men, aged 22-42 years) were recruited for measurement. A mixed-model repeated-measures analysis of variance was used. The most significant differences in displacement, and therefore internal rotation, were observed between the neutral and anterior superior iliac spine (0.21 ± 0.39 mm, P= .0269) and between the anterior superior iliac spine and peak iliac crest (0.26 ± 0.44 mm, P= .0163). After the peak iliac crest, there was no further statistically significant change in rotation. Conclusion The present study suggests that most glenohumeral internal rotation occurs before reaching the arm behind the back. Although not directly studied, this supports the notion that the maximal vertebral level reached involves an interplay of various joint motions. While the thumb to spinous process maneuver remains a functional evaluation, our results suggest a different examination technique be used to more accurately test glenohumeral internal rotation.