Dataset Information

Intratumoral administration of astatine-211-labeled gold nanoparticle for alpha therapy.

ABSTRACT:

Background

²¹¹At is a high-energy α-ray emitter with a relatively short half-life and a high cytotoxicity for cancer cells. Its dispersion can be imaged using clinical scanners, and it can be produced in cyclotrons without the use of nuclear fuel material. This study investigated the biodistribution and the antitumor effect of ²¹¹At-labeled gold nanoparticles (²¹¹At-AuNP) administered intratumorally.

Results

AuNP with a diameter of 5, 13, 30, or 120 nm that had been modified with poly (ethylene glycol) methyl ether (mPEG) thiol and labeled with ²¹¹At (²¹¹At-AuNP-S-mPEG) were incubated with tumor cells, or intratumorally administered to C6 glioma or PANC-1 pancreatic cancers subcutaneously transplanted into rodent models. Systemic and intratumoral distributions of the particles in the rodents were then evaluated using scintigraphy and autoradiography, and the changes in tumor volumes were followed for about 40 days. ²¹¹At-AuNP-S-mPEG was cytotoxic when it was internalized by the tumor cells. After intratumoral administration, ²¹¹At-AuNP-S-mPEG became localized in the tumor and did not spread to systemic organs during a time period equivalent to 6 half-lives of ²¹¹At. Tumor growth was strongly suppressed for both C6 and PANC-1 by ²¹¹At-AuNP-S-mPEG. In the C6 glioma model, the strongest antitumor effect was observed in the group treated with ²¹¹At-AuNP-S-mPEG with a diameter of 5 nm.

Conclusions

The intratumoral single administration of a simple nanoparticle, ²¹¹At-AuNP-S-mPEG, was shown to suppress the growth of tumor tissue strongly in a particle size-dependent manner without radiation exposure to other organs caused by systemic spread of the radionuclide.

SUBMITTER: Kato H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8317303 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:PURPOSE:Targeted alpha therapy (TAT) is a promising treatment for micrometastatic and minimal residual cancer. We evaluated systemic ?-radioimmunotherapy (?-RIT) of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) using the ?-particle emitter 211At-labeled to the anti-PSCA A11 minibody. A11 is specific for prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA), a cell surface glycoprotein which is overexpressed in more than 90% of both localized prostate cancer and bone metastases. METHODS:PC3-PSCA cells were implanted subcutaneously (s.c.) and intratibially (i.t) in nude mice. Efficacy of ?-RIT (two fractions-14-day interval) was studied on s.c. macrotumors (0, 1.5 and 1.9?MBq) and on i.t. microtumors (~100-200??m; 0, 0.8 or 1.5?MBq) by tumor-volume measurements. The injected activities for therapies were estimated from separate biodistribution and myelotoxicity studies. RESULTS:Tumor targeting of 211At-A11 was efficient and the effect on s.c. macrotumors was strong and dose-dependent. At 6?weeks, the mean tumor volumes for the treated groups, compared with controls, were reduced by approximately 85%. The separate myelotoxicity study following one single fraction showed reduced white blood cells (WBC) for all treated groups on day 6 after treatment. For the 0.8 and 1.5?MBq, the WBC reductions were transient and followed by recovery at day 13. For 2.4?MBq, a clear toxicity was observed and the mice were sacrificed on day 7. In the long-term follow-up of the 0.8 and 1.5?MBq-groups, blood counts on day 252 were normal and no signs of radiotoxicity observed. Efficacy on i.t. microtumors was evaluated in two experiments. In experiment 1, the tumor-free fraction (TFF) was 95% for both treated groups and significantly different (p < 0.05) from the controls at a TFF of 66%). In experiment 2, the difference in TFF was smaller, 32% for the treated group versus 20% for the controls. However, the difference in microtumor volume in experiment 2 was highly significant, 0.010 ± 0.003?mm3 versus 3.79 ± 1.24?mm3 (treated versus controls, respectively), i.e., a 99.7% reduction (p < 0.001). The different outcome in experiment 1 and 2 is most likely due to differences in microtumor sizes at therapy, or higher tumor-take in experiment 2 (where more cells were implanted). CONCLUSION:Evaluating fractionated ?-RIT with 211At-labeled anti-PSCA A11 minibody, we found clear growth inhibition on both macrotumors and intratibial microtumors. For mice treated with multiple fractions, we also observed radiotoxicity manifested by progressive loss in body weight at 30 to 90?days after treatment. Our findings are conceptually promising for a systemic TAT of mCRPC and warrant further investigations of 211At-labeled PSCA-directed vectors. Such studies should include methods to improve the therapeutic window, e.g., by implementing a pretargeted regimen of ?-RIT or by altering the size of the targeting vector.

Project description:The objective of this study was to translate reaction conditions and quality control methods used for production of an astatine-211(211At)-labeled anti-CD45 monoclonal antibody (MAb) conjugate, 211At-BC8-B10, from the laboratory setting to cGMP production. Five separate materials were produced in the preparation of 211At-BC8-B10: (1) p-isothiocyanato-phenethyl-closo-decaborate(2-) (B10-NCS), (2) anti-CD45 MAb, BC8, (3) BC8-B10 MAb conjugate, (4) [211At]NaAt, and (5) 211At-BC8-B10. The 211At-labeling reagent, B10-NCS, was synthesized as previously reported. BC8 was produced, then conjugated with B10-NCS under cGMP conditions to form BC8-B10. [211At]NaAt was produced by α-irradiation of Bi targets, followed by isolation of the 211At using a "wet chemistry" method. The clinical product, 211At-BC8-B10, was prepared by reacting [211At]NaAt with BC8-B10 in NH4OAc buffer (pH 5.5) for 2 min at room temperature, followed by size-exclusion chromatography purification. Quality control tests conducted on the 211At-BC8-B10 included evaluations for purity and identity, as well as pyrogen and sterility tests. Stability of the 211At-BC8-B10 in 25 mg/mL sodium ascorbate solution was evaluated at 1, 2, 4, 6 and 21 h post isolation. For qualification, three consecutive 211At-BC8-B10 clinical preparations were successfully conducted in the cGMP suite, and an additional cGMP clinical preparation was carried out to validate each step required to deliver 211At-BC8-B10 to a patient. These cGMP preparations provided 0.80-1.28 Gbq (21.5-34.5 mCi) of 211At-BC8-B10 with radiochemical purity of >97%. The preparations were found to be sterile and have a pyrogen level <0.50 EU/mL. Cell binding was retained by the 211At-BC8-B10. 211At-BC8-B10 in ascorbic acid solution demonstrated a radiochemical stability of >95% for up to 21 h at room temperature. The experiments conducted have defined conditions for translation of 211At-BC8-B10 production from the laboratory to cGMP suite. This study has allowed the initiation of a phase I/II clinical trial using 211At-BC8-B10 (NCT03128034).