Dataset Information

Postoperative Radiotherapy for Patients With Resectable Stage III-N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

For resectable cases of stage III-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the best treatment after surgery is still uncertain. The effect of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) is controversial. Thus, we performed this updated meta-analysis to reassess the data of PORT in stage III-N2 NSCLC patients, to figure out whether these patients can benefit from PORT.

Methods

We conducted searches of the published literature in EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library for relevant randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing PORT group with the non-PORT group in NSCLC patients at stage III-N2. These studies allowed the prior chemotherapy in the treatment. We extracted the data from these articles and used the hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as summary statistics for estimating the effect of PORT on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local-regional recurrence-free survival (LRFS).

Result

The analyses of seven randomized controlled trials (1,318 participants) show no benefit of PORT on survival (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.07; p = 0.18) but a significantly different effect of PORT on DFS (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.97; p = 0.02) and LRFS (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.81; p = 0.0003). There is not enough evidence of a difference in the effect on survival by the utility of chemotherapy along with PORT though subgroup analysis of no chemotherapy group, concurrent chemoradiotherapy and sequential chemoradiotherapy group. Even in trials with 3D-CRT radiation technique, the pooled analysis shows no benefit of PORT on survival in patients with stage III-N2 NSCLC (data is not shown).

Conclusion

Our findings illustrate that in the postoperative treatment for patients with stage III-N2 NSCLC, PORT contributes to a significantly increased DFS and LR and may not associate with an improved OS, indicating a cautious selection.

SUBMITTER: Lei T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8320322 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Simple Summary The treatment of resectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer with N2 lymph node involvement is usually multimodal and is generally based on neoadjuvant chemotherapy +/− radiotherapy followed by surgery, but the cure rate is still low. Immunotherapy based on anti-PD1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors has improved survival in advanced and stage III non-resectable NSCLC patients and is being studied in earlier stages to improve the cure rate of lung cancer. In this article, we review all therapeutic approaches to stage III-N2 NSCLC, analysing both completed and ongoing studies that evaluate the addition of immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Abstract Stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with N2 lymph node involvement is a heterogeneous group with different potential therapeutic approaches. Patients with potentially resectable III-N2 NSCLC are those who are considered to be able to receive a multimodality treatment that includes tumour resection after neoadjuvant therapy. Current treatment for these patients is based on neoadjuvant chemotherapy +/− radiotherapy followed by surgery and subsequent assessment for adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. In addition, some selected III-N2 patients could receive upfront surgery or pathologic N2 incidental involvement can be found a posteriori during analysis of the surgical specimen. The standard treatment for these patients is adjuvant chemotherapy and evaluation for complementary radiotherapy. Despite being a locally advanced stage, the cure rate for these patients continues to be low, with a broad improvement margin. The most immediate hope for improving survival data and curing these patients relies on integrating immunotherapy into perioperative treatment. Immunotherapy based on anti-PD1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors is already a standard treatment in stage III unresectable and advanced NSCLC. Data from the first phase II studies in monotherapy neoadjuvant therapy and, in particular, in combination with chemotherapy, are highly promising, with impressive improved and complete pathological response rates. Despite the lack of confirmatory data from phase III trials and long-term survival data, and in spite of various unresolved questions, immunotherapy will soon be incorporated into the armamentarium for treating stage III-N2 NSCLC. In this article, we review all therapeutic approaches to stage III-N2 NSCLC, analysing both completed and ongoing studies that evaluate the addition of immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.

Project description:BackgroundLung cancer serum tumor markers including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA21-1), and carbohydrate antigen 125(CA125) as prognostic predictors is controversial. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the association between these markers and the survival of patients with postoperative stage III-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).MethodsWe enrolled 1011 patients with pathologically confirmed stage III-N2 NSCLC who underwent resection and whose pretreatment serum tumor marker levels were available. Patients were categorized according to their serum levels into low-, medium-, and high-risk groups. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local regional relapse-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were calculated from the date of resection. Their association with each serum tumor marker was assessed using the log-rank test.ResultsAbnormal CEA levels were associated with worse five-year OS, PFS and DMFS; abnormal CYFRA21-1 levels were associated with worse five-year OS and LRFS; and abnormal CA125 levels were associated with worse five-year OS, PFS, LRFS and DMFS. Among the risk groups, there were significant differences in five-year OS, PFS, LRFS and DMFS (P = 0.000). In propensity score matching analysis, the model also achieved prognostic significance for all four survival classifications (P = 0.001-0.004) among the three risk groups.ConclusionsThe combined model achieved prognostic significance for all survival outcome types. The serum tumor markers tested are useful prognostic predictors for postoperative NSCLC patients but not for all survival outcomes. The combination of the three indices is more reliable in predicting all four of the survival outcomes.Key pointsSIGNIFICANT FINDINGS OF THE STUDY: Serum CEA, CYFRA21-1, and CA125 levels can be used as prognostic factors of postoperative N2 non-small cell lung cancer patients but not for all survival outcomes, suggesting that combinative detection of all three indices would be more reliable.What this study addsOur model utilizes available technology, with conventional cutoff values, inexpensive costs, and simple mathematics methods and, thus, can be feasibly employed by clinicians or oncologists.

Project description:ObjectivesAlthough postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) could reduce the incidence of local recurrence in patients with IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the role of PORT on survival in patients with surgically treated stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC remains controversial. Therefore, this study was designed to evaluate the effect of PORT on survival for patients with surgically treated stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC.Materials and methodsThis study population was chosen from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to determine significant contributors to overall survival (OS) and cancer special survival (CSS) outcomes. To balance baseline characteristics between the non-PORT group and PORT group, propensity score matching (PSM) with 1:1 propensity nearest-neighbor match by 0.001 matching tolerance was conducted by R software. Furthermore, a Kaplan-Meier curve was used to visualize the OS and CSS between the PORT group and non-PORT group survival probability.ResultsOf all evaluated cases, 4511 with IIIA-N2 NSCLC were eligible for inclusion, of which 1920 were enrolled into the PORT group. On univariate analysis and multivariate analysis, sex, age, year of diagnosis, race, histologic type, T stage, PORT, use of chemotherapy, and positive regional nodes were significantly associated with OS and CSS in IIIA-N2 NSCLC (P < 0.05). However, PORT was not significantly associated with OS (univariate HR = 0.92, 95%CI 0.85-0.99, P = 0.02; multivariate HR = 1.01, 95%CI 0.93-1.08, P = 0.91) and CSS (univariate HR = 0.92, 95%CI 0.85-1.01, P = 0.06; multivariate HR = 1.103 95%CI 0.94-1.12, P = 0.56) in IIIA-N2 NSCLC. Meanwhile, after PSM, neither OS nor CSS did differ significantly between the non-PORT group and PORT group (OS HR = 1.08, 95%CI 0.98-1.19, P = 0.12; CSS HR = 1.10, 95%CI 0.99-1.23, P = 0.07).ConclusionPORT did not contribute to a survival benefit in patients with surgically treated stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC.