Quantitative Comparison of Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction Methods for Low-Dose and Sparse-Angle CT Applications.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Leuschner J
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8321320 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:ObjectivesTo perform a comprehensive within-subject image quality analysis of abdominal CT examinations reconstructed with DLIR and to evaluate diagnostic accuracy compared to the routinely applied adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR-V) algorithm.Materials and methodsOncologic patients were prospectively enrolled and underwent contrast-enhanced CT. Images were reconstructed with DLIR with three intensity levels of reconstruction (high, medium, and low) and ASiR-V at strength levels from 10 to 100% with a 10% interval. Three radiologists characterized the lesions and two readers assessed diagnostic accuracy and calculated signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), figure of merit (FOM), and subjective image quality, the latter with a 5-point Likert scale.ResultsFifty patients (mean age: 70 ± 10 years, 23 men) were enrolled and 130 liver lesions (105 benign lesions, 25 metastases) were identified. DLIR_H achieved the highest SNR and CNR, comparable to ASiR-V 100% (p ≥ .051). DLIR_M returned the highest subjective image quality (score: 5; IQR: 4-5; p ≤ .001) and significant median increase (29%) in FOM (p < .001). Differences in detection were identified only for lesions ≤ 0.5 cm: 32/33 lesions were detected with DLIR_M and 26 lesions were detected with ASiR-V 50% (p = .031). Lesion accuracy of was 93.8% (95% CI: 88.1, 97.3; 122 of 130 lesions) for DLIR and 87.7% (95% CI: 80.8, 92.8; 114 of 130 lesions) for ASiR-V 50%.ConclusionsDLIR yields superior image quality and provides higher diagnostic accuracy compared to ASiR-V in the assessment of hypovascular liver lesions, in particular for lesions ≤ 0.5 cm.Clinical relevance statementDeep learning image reconstruction algorithm demonstrates higher diagnostic accuracy compared to iterative reconstruction in the identification of hypovascular liver lesions, especially for lesions ≤ 0.5 cm.Key points• Iterative reconstruction algorithm impacts image texture, with negative effects on diagnostic capabilities. • Medium-strength deep learning image reconstruction algorithm outperforms iterative reconstruction in the diagnostic accuracy of ≤ 0.5 cm hypovascular liver lesions (93.9% vs 78.8%), also granting higher objective and subjective image quality. • Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm can be safely implemented in routine abdominal CT protocols in place of iterative reconstruction.
| S-EPMC10957592 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundIterative computed tomography (CT) image reconstruction shows high potential for the preservation of image quality in diagnostic CT while reducing patients' exposure; it has become available for low-dose CT (LD-CT) in high-end hybrid imaging systems (e.g. single-photon emission computed tomography [SPECT]-CT).PurposeTo examine the effect of an iterative CT reconstruction algorithm on image quality, image noise, detectability, and the reader's confidence for LD-CT data by a subjective assessment.Material and methodsThe LD-CT data were validated for 40 patients examined by an abdominal hybrid SPECT-CT (U = 120 kV, I = 40 mA, pitch = 1.375). LD-CT was reconstructed using either filtered back projection (FBP) or an iterative image reconstruction algorithm (Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction [ASIR]®) with different parameters (ASIR levels 50% and 100%). The data were validated by two independent blinded readers using a scoring system for image quality, image noise, detectability, and reader confidence, for a predefined set of 16 anatomic substructures.ResultsThe image quality was significantly improved by iterative reconstruction of the LD-CT data compared with FBP (P ≤ 0.0001). While detectability increased in only 2/16 structures (P ≤ 0.03), the reader's confidence increased significantly due to iterative reconstruction (P ≤ 0.002). Meanwhile, at the ASIR level of 100%, the detectability in bone structure was highly reduced (P = 0.003).ConclusionAn ASIR level of 50% represents a good compromise in abdominal LD-CT image reconstruction. The specific ASIR level improved image quality (reduced image noise) and reader confidence, while preserving detectability of bone structure.
| S-EPMC6587393 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Sparse-view CT reconstruction is a fundamental task in computed tomography to overcome undesired artifacts and recover the details of textual structure in degraded CT images. Recently, many deep learning-based networks have achieved desirable performances compared to iterative reconstruction algorithms. However, the performance of these methods may severely deteriorate when the degradation strength of the test image is not consistent with that of the training dataset. In addition, these methods do not pay enough attention to the characteristics of different degradation levels, so solely extending the training dataset with multiple degraded images is also not effective. Although training plentiful models in terms of each degradation level can mitigate this problem, extensive parameter storage is involved. Accordingly, in this paper, we focused on sparse-view CT reconstruction for multiple degradation levels. We propose a single degradation-aware deep learning framework to predict clear CT images by understanding the disparity of degradation in both the frequency domain and image domain. The dual-domain procedure can perform particular operations at different degradation levels in frequency component recovery and spatial details reconstruction. The peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity (SSIM) and visual results demonstrate that our method outperformed the classical deep learning-based reconstruction methods in terms of effectiveness and scalability.
| S-EPMC8704775 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and Objectives: Although reducing the radiation dose level is important during diagnostic computed tomography (CT) applications, effective image quality enhancement strategies are crucial to compensate for the degradation that is caused by a dose reduction. We performed this prospective study to quantify emphysema on ultra-low-dose CT images that were reconstructed using deep learning-based image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithms, and compared and evaluated the accuracies of DLIR algorithms versus standard-dose CT. Materials and Methods: A total of 32 patients were prospectively enrolled, and all underwent standard-dose and ultra-low-dose (120 kVp; CTDIvol < 0.7 mGy) chest CT scans at the same time in a single examination. A total of six image datasets (filtered back projection (FBP) for standard-dose CT, and FBP, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V) 50%, DLIR-low, DLIR-medium, DLIR-high for ultra-low-dose CT) were reconstructed for each patient. Image noise values, emphysema indices, total lung volumes, and mean lung attenuations were measured in the six image datasets and compared (one-way repeated measures ANOVA). Results: The mean effective doses for standard-dose and ultra-low-dose CT scans were 3.43 ± 0.57 mSv and 0.39 ± 0.03 mSv, respectively (p < 0.001). The total lung volume and mean lung attenuation of five image datasets of ultra-low-dose CT scans, emphysema indices of ultra-low-dose CT scans reconstructed using ASIR-V 50 or DLIR-low, and the image noise of ultra-low-dose CT scans that were reconstructed using DLIR-low were not different from those of standard-dose CT scans. Conclusions: Ultra-low-dose CT images that were reconstructed using DLIR-low were found to be useful for emphysema quantification at a radiation dose of only 11% of that required for standard-dose CT.
| S-EPMC9317892 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Low-dose CT image reconstruction has been a popular research topic in recent years. A typical reconstruction method based on post-log measurements is called penalized weighted-least squares (PWLS). Due to the underlying limitations of the post-log statistical model, the PWLS reconstruction quality is often degraded in low-dose scans. This paper investigates a shifted-Poisson (SP) model based likelihood function that uses the pre-log raw measurements that better represents the measurement statistics, together with a data-driven regularizer exploiting a Union of Learned TRAnsforms (SPULTRA). Both the SP induced data-fidelity term and the regularizer in the proposed framework are nonconvex. The proposed SPULTRA algorithm uses quadratic surrogate functions for the SP induced data-fidelity term. Each iteration involves a quadratic subproblem for updating the image, and a sparse coding and clustering subproblem that has a closed-form solution. The SPULTRA algorithm has a similar computational cost per iteration as its recent counterpart PWLS-ULTRA that uses post-log measurements, and it provides better image reconstruction quality than PWLS-ULTRA, especially in low-dose scans.
| S-EPMC7170173 | biostudies-literature
Project description:We investigated the effect of deep learning-based image reconstruction (DLIR) compared to iterative reconstruction on image quality in CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) for suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). For 220 patients with suspected PE, CTPA studies were reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP), adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR-V 30%, 60% and 90%) and DLIR (low, medium and high strength). Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) served as the primary parameter of objective image quality. Subgroup analyses were performed for normal weight, overweight and obese individuals. For patients with confirmed PE (n = 40), we further measured PE-specific CNR. Subjective image quality was assessed independently by two experienced radiologists. CNR was lowest for FBP and enhanced with increasing levels of ASiR-V and, even more with increasing strength of DLIR. High strength DLIR resulted in an additional improvement in CNR by 29-67% compared to ASiR-V 90% (p < 0.05). PE-specific CNR increased by 75% compared to ASiR-V 90% (p < 0.05). Subjective image quality was significantly higher for medium and high strength DLIR compared to all other image reconstructions (p < 0.05). In CT pulmonary angiography, DLIR significantly outperforms iterative reconstruction for increasing objective and subjective image quality. This may allow for further reductions in radiation exposure in suspected PE.
| S-EPMC10827738 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe widespread application of X-ray computed tomography (CT) imaging in medical screening makes radiation safety a major concern for public health. Sparse-view CT is a promising solution to reduce the radiation dose. However, the reconstructed CT images obtained using sparse-view CT may suffer severe streaking artifacts and structural information loss.MethodsIn this study, a novel attention-based dual-branch network (ADB-Net) is proposed to solve the ill-posed problem of sparse-view CT image reconstruction. In this network, downsampled sinogram input is processed through 2 parallel branches (CT branch and signogram branch) of the ADB-Net to independently extract the distinct, high-level feature maps. These feature maps are fused in a specified attention module from 3 perspectives (channel, plane, and spatial) to allow complementary optimizations that can mitigate the streaking artifacts and the structure loss in sparse-view CT imaging.ResultsNumerical simulations, an anthropomorphic thorax phantom, and in vivo preclinical experiments were conducted to verify the sparse-view CT imaging performance of the ADB-Net. The proposed network achieved a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 20.6160, a structural similarity (SSIM) of 0.9257, and a peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) of 38.8246 on numerical data. The visualization results demonstrate that this newly developed network can consistently remove the streaking artifacts while maintaining the fine structures.ConclusionsThe proposed attention-based dual-branch deep network, ADB-Net, provides a promising alternative to reconstruct high-quality sparse-view CT images for low-dose CT imaging.
| S-EPMC10006128 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Commercial iterative reconstruction techniques help to reduce CT radiation dose but altered image appearance and artifacts limit their adoptability and potential use. Deep learning has been investigated for low-dose CT (LDCT). Here we design a modularized neural network for LDCT and compared it with commercial iterative reconstruction methods from three leading CT vendors. While popular networks are trained for an end-to-end mapping, our network performs an end-to-process mapping so that intermediate denoised images are obtained with associated noise reduction directions towards a final denoised image. The learned workflow allows radiologists-in-the-loop to optimize the denoising depth in a task-specific fashion. Our network was trained with the Mayo LDCT Dataset, and tested on separate chest and abdominal CT exams from Massachusetts General Hospital. The best deep learning reconstructions were systematically compared to the best iterative reconstructions in a double-blinded reader study. This study confirms that our deep learning approach performed either favorably or comparably in terms of noise suppression and structural fidelity, and is much faster than the commercial iterative reconstruction algorithms.
| S-EPMC7687920 | biostudies-literature
Project description:We report an algorithm for reconstructing images when the average number of photons recorded per pixel is of order unity, i.e. photon-sparse data. The image optimisation algorithm minimises a cost function incorporating both a Poissonian log-likelihood term based on the deviation of the reconstructed image from the measured data and a regularization-term based upon the sum of the moduli of the second spatial derivatives of the reconstructed image pixel intensities. The balance between these two terms is set by a bootstrapping technique where the target value of the log-likelihood term is deduced from a smoothed version of the original data. When compared to the original data, the processed images exhibit lower residuals with respect to the true object. We use photon-sparse data from two different experimental systems, one system based on a single-photon, avalanche photo-diode array and the other system on a time-gated, intensified camera. However, this same processing technique could most likely be applied to any low photon-number image irrespective of how the data is collected.
| S-EPMC5294572 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveFew studies have explored the clinical feasibility of using deep-learning reconstruction to reduce the radiation dose of CT. We aimed to compare the image quality and lung nodule detectability between chest CT using a quarter of the low dose (QLD) reconstructed with vendor-agnostic deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and conventional low-dose (LD) CT reconstructed with iterative reconstruction (IR).Materials and methodsWe retrospectively collected 100 patients (median age, 61 years [IQR, 53-70 years]) who received LDCT using a dual-source scanner, where total radiation was split into a 1:3 ratio. QLD CT was generated using a quarter dose and reconstructed with DLIR (QLD-DLIR), while LDCT images were generated using a full dose and reconstructed with IR (LD-IR). Three thoracic radiologists reviewed subjective noise, spatial resolution, and overall image quality, and image noise was measured in five areas. The radiologists were also asked to detect all Lung-RADS category 3 or 4 nodules, and their performance was evaluated using area under the jackknife free-response receiver operating characteristic curve (AUFROC).ResultsThe median effective dose was 0.16 (IQR, 0.14-0.18) mSv for QLD CT and 0.65 (IQR, 0.57-0.71) mSv for LDCT. The radiologists' evaluations showed no significant differences in subjective noise (QLD-DLIR vs. LD-IR, lung-window setting; 3.23 ± 0.19 vs. 3.27 ± 0.22; P = .11), spatial resolution (3.14 ± 0.28 vs. 3.16 ± 0.27; P = .12), and overall image quality (3.14 ± 0.21 vs. 3.17 ± 0.17; P = .15). QLD-DLIR demonstrated lower measured noise than LD-IR in most areas (P < .001 for all). No significant difference was found between QLD-DLIR and LD-IR for the sensitivity (76.4% vs. 72.2%; P = .35) or the AUFROCs (0.77 vs. 0.78; P = .68) in detecting Lung-RADS category 3 or 4 nodules. Under a noninferiority limit of -0.1, QLD-DLIR showed noninferior detection performance (95% CI for AUFROC difference, -0.04 to 0.06).ConclusionQLD-DLIR images showed comparable image quality and noninferior nodule detectability relative to LD-IR images.
| S-EPMC10494344 | biostudies-literature