Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Epidemics of chikungunya, Zika, and COVID-19 reveal bias in case-based mapping.


ABSTRACT: Explosive epidemics of chikungunya, Zika, and COVID-19 have recently occurred worldwide, all of which featured large proportions of subclinical infections. Spatial studies of infectious disease epidemics typically use symptomatic infections (cases) to estimate incidence rates (cases/total population), often misinterpreting them as infection risks (infections/total population) or disease risks (cases/infected population). We examined these three measures in a pediatric cohort (N≈3,000) over two chikungunya epidemics and one Zika epidemic and in a household cohort (N=1,793) over one COVID-19 epidemic in Nicaragua. Across different analyses and all epidemics, case incidence rates considerably underestimated both risk-based measures. Spatial infection risk differed from spatial disease risk, and typical case-only approaches precluded a full understanding of the spatial seroprevalence patterns. For epidemics of pathogens that cause many subclinical infections, relying on case-only datasets and misinterpreting incidence rates, as is common, results in substantial bias, a general finding applicable to many pathogens of high human concern.

SUBMITTER: Bustos Carrillo FA 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8328077 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6572372 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8291727 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9538730 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2903258 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7776968 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9506664 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9197046 | biostudies-literature
| S-BSST563 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC7734053 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7366467 | biostudies-literature