Dataset Information

Comparative Effects of Metformin and Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors in Japanese Obese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Claims Database Study.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Metformin has demonstrated favorable effects on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), regardless of the body mass index (BMI). On the contrary, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) are reportedly less effective in patients having high BMI values (≥ 25 or ≥ 30). The aim of this study was to compare metformin and DPP-4is as first-line treatment for their effects on glycemic control and improvement of other health outcomes among obese and non-obese Japanese patients with T2D.

Methods

A Japanese health insurance claims database that also included annual medical checkup data was used. This database included data on company employees who were members of health insurance societies and their family members. Most patients were aged < 65 years and most were men. Inclusion criteria were: (1) a first T2D diagnosis between May 2010 and June 2017; (2) either metformin or a DPP-4i prescribed as the first-line antidiabetic therapy; and (3) glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and BMI data available for the 3-month period immediately preceding the initiation of antidiabetic treatment (baseline). The reduction rate in excessive HbA1c (> 6.5%; primary outcome) and changes in fasting plasma glucose, BMI, triglyceride, cholesterol, and abdominal circumference (secondary outcomes) at 12 months from baseline were compared between treatments.

Results

When evaluated relative to the baseline BMI, the mean reduction rate in excessive HbA1c tended to be higher in the metformin group than in the DPP-4i group, especially in patients with BMI ≥ 25. Similarly, significant improvement was observed in most outcomes in obese patients prescribed metformin compared to those prescribed a DPP-4i. In contrast, in patients with BMI < 25, HbA1c reduction was greater in patients prescribed DPP-4i and fewer outcomes showed significant improvement in patients prescribed metformin.

Conclusion

In obese Japanese patients with T2D, greater improvements in glycemic control and other outcomes were seen with metformin as first-line treatment for T2D compared with DPP-4is, although some limitations regarding the database information should be considered.

SUBMITTER: Odawara M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8342731 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:AIMS:To examine the outcomes of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor initiation with and without concurrent metformin treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS:We identified Medicare enrollees initiating a DPP-4 inhibitor, a sulphonylurea or a thiazolidinedione. Using propensity-score-weighted Poisson models, we evaluated 1-year cardiovascular (CV) outcome incidence among initiators of DPP-4 inhibitors versus comparators in subgroups with and without concurrent metformin use, and assessed the interaction between initiation drug and metformin. Outcomes included mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and a composite outcome. RESULTS:For the DPP-4 inhibitor (n?=?13?391) versus sulphonylurea (n?=?33?206) comparison, rate differences in composite outcome incidence favoured DPP-4 inhibitors: -2.0/100 person-years among metformin users (95% confidence interval [CI] -2.7 to -1.3) and?-?1.0/100 person-years (95% CI -1.8 to -0.2) among metformin non-users. Similar rate difference trends among metformin users and non-users were seen for mortality (-1.5/100 person-years [95% CI -2.1 to -0.9] and -0.7/100 person-years [95% CI -1.4 to 0.0]) and non-fatal MI (-0.5/100 person-years [95% CI -0.8, -0.3] and 0.1/100 person-years [95% CI -0.2 to 0.4]). The interaction between DPP-4 inhibitor initiation and metformin was statistically significant for non-fatal MI (P?=?0.008). For the DPP-4 inhibitor (n?=?22?210) versus thiazolidinedione (n?=?9517) comparison, rate differences in composite outcome incidence for DPP-4 inhibitor initiation were -0.6/100 person-years (95% CI -1.5 to 0.2) among metformin users and 1.0 (95% CI 0.0 to 2.0) among metformin non-users. Similar rate difference trends among metformin users and non-users were seen for mortality (-0.5/100 person-years [95% CI -1.3 to 0.1] and 0.8/100 person-years [95% CI -0.0 to 1.7]) and non-fatal MI (-0.1/100 person-years [95% CI -0.4 to 0.2] and 0.2/100 person-years [95% CI -0.1 to 0.6]). The interaction between DPP-4 inhibitor initiation and metformin was statistically significant for the composite outcome (P?=?0.024) and mortality (P?=?0.023). CONCLUSION:Incidence rate differences in multiple CV outcomes appeared more favourable when DPP-4 inhibitor initiation occurred in the presence of metformin, suggesting a possible interaction between DPP-4 inhibitors and metformin.

Project description:IntroductionMetformin has dose-dependent hypoglycemic effects on patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). In Japan, metformin has been prescribed at lower doses than in Western countries. We analyzed the effect of increasing the metformin dose on glycemic control and compared it to a combination therapy with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) and a replacement therapy with DPP-4i.MethodsThis is a cohort study using a Japanese claims database. Patients with T2D who had been initially treated with low-dose metformin (≥ 500 mg/day and < 1000 mg/day) and then given a prescription change by increasing metformin to a higher dose (≥ 1000 mg/day) (increased-dose), adding DPP-4i (drug-added), or switching to DPP-4i (drug-switched) were included in this study. The primary outcome was the change in HbA1c levels at 12 months from the baseline period.ResultsAmong 2,726,437 patients with T2D, 494 were included. Of these patients, 226, 240, and 28 patients were classified as increased-dose, drug-added, and drug-switched groups, respectively. The HbA1c levels at 12 months from the index significantly decreased compared to that during the baseline period. The change was the highest in the drug-added group (- 1.06%), followed by the increased-dose (- 0.91%) and the drug-switched groups (- 0.37%). Among the subset of patients who did not receive any antidiabetic drugs other than metformin or DPP-4i, the highest change in HbA1c levels was observed in the increased-dose group (- 0.84%), followed by the drug-added (- 0.67%) and the drug-switched (- 0.42%) groups. The order of decrease from baseline remained the same for all the study groups after the propensity score weighting adjustment.ConclusionThe effect on glycemic control when increasing the metformin dose was studied in patients who had been receiving low-dose metformin. Increasing metformin dosage shows effectiveness and could be one of the next treatment options in patients who were prescribed low-dose metformin as the first-line treatment.

Project description:Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a complex and progressive disease that is showing an apparently unstoppable increase worldwide. Although there is general agreement on the first-line use of metformin in most patients with type 2 diabetes, the ideal drug sequence after metformin failure is an area of increasing uncertainty. New treatment strategies target pancreatic islet dysfunction, in particular gut-derived incretin hormones. Inhibition of the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) slows degradation of endogenous glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and thereby enhances and prolongs the action of the endogenous incretin hormones. The five available DPP-4 inhibitors, also known as 'gliptins' (sitagliptin, vildagliptin, saxagliptin, linagliptin, alogliptin), are small molecules used orally with similar overall clinical efficacy and safety profiles in patients with type 2 diabetes. The main differences between the five gliptins on the market include: potency, target selectivity, oral bioavailability, long or short half-life, high or low binding to plasma proteins, metabolism, presence of active or inactive metabolites, excretion routes, dosage adjustment for renal and liver insufficiency, and potential drug-drug interactions. On average, treatment with gliptins is expected to produce a mean glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) decrease of 0.5%-0.8%, with about 40% of diabetic subjects at target for the HbA1c goal <7%. There are very few studies comparing DPP-4 inhibitors. Alogliptin as monotherapy or added to metformin, pioglitazone, glibenclamide, voglibose, or insulin therapy significantly improves glycemic control compared with placebo in adult or elderly patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes. In the EXAMINE trial, alogliptin is being compared with placebo on cardiovascular outcomes in approximately 5,400 patients with type 2 diabetes. In clinical studies, DPP-4 inhibitors were generally safe and well tolerated. However, there are limited data on their tolerability, due to their relatively recent marketing approval. Alogliptin will be used most when avoidance of hypoglycemic events is paramount, such as in patients with congestive heart failure, renal failure, and liver disease, and in the elderly.

Project description:IntroductionPatients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in Japan are prescribed a lower dose of metformin that their counterparts in Western countries due to concerns for the risk of lactic acidosis incidence. Here we report our study on the association between high-dose metformin administration and the incidence of lactic acidosis in Japanese patients with T2D.MethodsA Japanese claims database (April 2008-November 2018) was analyzed. Factors associated with the incidence of lactic acidosis were first identified from the database records by conducting a case-control study, and these were then used as confounding factors in subsequent analyses. The association between high-dose metformin administration (≥ 1000 mg/day) and the incidence of lactic acidosis was compared with that between low-dose metformin (< 1000 mg/day) or no metformin administration and lactic acidosis incidence by using the following approaches: a logistic regression analysis hypothesizing that metformin-associated lactic acidosis is short term; a time-dependent proportional hazard model hypothesizing that the influence of metformin is cumulative; and a case-control study in which lactic acidosis incidence was the case and metformin administration within 3 months prior to the incidence of lactic acidosis (or corresponding date for the control) was the exposure.ResultsPrescriptions for biguanide and vitamin B complex and volume depletion were identified as factors associated with the incidence of lactic acidosis. The incidence rate was higher in patients prescribed metformin than in those not receiving metformin; however, it was not higher in those prescribed high-dose metformin compared to those prescribed low-dose metformin. The estimated regression coefficient for high-dose metformin administration was 0.816 (p < 0.001); this was not higher than those for low-dose metformin (1.047), vitamin B complex (2.725) and volume depletion (3.301). The time-dependent proportional hazard analysis did not indicate any effect of metformin prescription.ConclusionThe results suggest an association between metformin administration and the incidence of lactic acidosis, but an increase in the incidence rate of lactic acidosis was not observed in those patients receiving high-dose metformin compared to those receiving low-dose metformin.