Dataset Information

Effect of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors vs. Metformin on Major Cardiovascular Events Using Spontaneous Reporting System and Real-World Database Study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Metformin had been recommended as the first-line treatment for type 2 diabetes since 2006 because of its low cost, high efficacy, and potential to reduce cardiovascular events, and thus death. However, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are the most commonly prescribed first-line agents for patients with type 2 diabetes in Japan. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the effect of DPP-4 inhibitors on preventing cardiovascular events, taking into consideration the actual prescription of antidiabetic drugs in Japan.

Methods

This study examined the effect of DPP-4 inhibitors on preventing cardiovascular events. The Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database, a spontaneous reporting system in Japan, and the Japanese Medical Data Center (JMDC) Claims Database, a Japanese health insurance claims and medical checkup database, were used for the analysis. Metformin was used as the DPP-4 inhibitor comparator. Major cardiovascular events were set as the primary endpoint.

Results

In the analysis using the JADER database, a signal of major cardiovascular events was detected with DPP-4 inhibitors (IC: 0.22, 95% confidence interval: 0.03-0.40) but not with metformin. In the analysis using the JMDC Claims Database, the hazard ratio of major cardiovascular events for DPP-4 inhibitors versus metformin was 1.01 (95% CI: 0.84-1.20).

Conclusions

A comprehensive analysis using two different databases in Japan, the JADER and the JMDC Claims Database, showed that DPP-4 inhibitors, which are widely used in Japan, have a non-inferior risk of cardiovascular events compared to metformin, which is used as the first-line drug in the United States and Europe.

SUBMITTER: Noguchi Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9456525 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Effect of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors vs. Metformin on Major Cardiovascular Events Using Spontaneous Reporting System and Real-World Database Study.

Noguchi Yoshihiro Y Yoshizawa Shunsuke S Tachi Tomoya T Teramachi Hitomi H

Journal of clinical medicine 20220825 17

<h4>Background</h4>Metformin had been recommended as the first-line treatment for type 2 diabetes since 2006 because of its low cost, high efficacy, and potential to reduce cardiovascular events, and thus death. However, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are the most commonly prescribed first-line agents for patients with type 2 diabetes in Japan. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the effect of DPP-4 inhibitors on preventing cardiovascular events, taking into consideration the actual ...[more]

PMID: 36078917

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionMetformin has demonstrated favorable effects on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), regardless of the body mass index (BMI). On the contrary, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) are reportedly less effective in patients having high BMI values (≥ 25 or ≥ 30). The aim of this study was to compare metformin and DPP-4is as first-line treatment for their effects on glycemic control and improvement of other health outcomes among obese and non-obese Japanese patients with T2D.MethodsA Japanese health insurance claims database that also included annual medical checkup data was used. This database included data on company employees who were members of health insurance societies and their family members. Most patients were aged < 65 years and most were men. Inclusion criteria were: (1) a first T2D diagnosis between May 2010 and June 2017; (2) either metformin or a DPP-4i prescribed as the first-line antidiabetic therapy; and (3) glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and BMI data available for the 3-month period immediately preceding the initiation of antidiabetic treatment (baseline). The reduction rate in excessive HbA1c (> 6.5%; primary outcome) and changes in fasting plasma glucose, BMI, triglyceride, cholesterol, and abdominal circumference (secondary outcomes) at 12 months from baseline were compared between treatments.ResultsWhen evaluated relative to the baseline BMI, the mean reduction rate in excessive HbA1c tended to be higher in the metformin group than in the DPP-4i group, especially in patients with BMI ≥ 25. Similarly, significant improvement was observed in most outcomes in obese patients prescribed metformin compared to those prescribed a DPP-4i. In contrast, in patients with BMI < 25, HbA1c reduction was greater in patients prescribed DPP-4i and fewer outcomes showed significant improvement in patients prescribed metformin.ConclusionIn obese Japanese patients with T2D, greater improvements in glycemic control and other outcomes were seen with metformin as first-line treatment for T2D compared with DPP-4is, although some limitations regarding the database information should be considered.

Project description:IntroductionMetformin has dose-dependent hypoglycemic effects on patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). In Japan, metformin has been prescribed at lower doses than in Western countries. We analyzed the effect of increasing the metformin dose on glycemic control and compared it to a combination therapy with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) and a replacement therapy with DPP-4i.MethodsThis is a cohort study using a Japanese claims database. Patients with T2D who had been initially treated with low-dose metformin (≥ 500 mg/day and < 1000 mg/day) and then given a prescription change by increasing metformin to a higher dose (≥ 1000 mg/day) (increased-dose), adding DPP-4i (drug-added), or switching to DPP-4i (drug-switched) were included in this study. The primary outcome was the change in HbA1c levels at 12 months from the baseline period.ResultsAmong 2,726,437 patients with T2D, 494 were included. Of these patients, 226, 240, and 28 patients were classified as increased-dose, drug-added, and drug-switched groups, respectively. The HbA1c levels at 12 months from the index significantly decreased compared to that during the baseline period. The change was the highest in the drug-added group (- 1.06%), followed by the increased-dose (- 0.91%) and the drug-switched groups (- 0.37%). Among the subset of patients who did not receive any antidiabetic drugs other than metformin or DPP-4i, the highest change in HbA1c levels was observed in the increased-dose group (- 0.84%), followed by the drug-added (- 0.67%) and the drug-switched (- 0.42%) groups. The order of decrease from baseline remained the same for all the study groups after the propensity score weighting adjustment.ConclusionThe effect on glycemic control when increasing the metformin dose was studied in patients who had been receiving low-dose metformin. Increasing metformin dosage shows effectiveness and could be one of the next treatment options in patients who were prescribed low-dose metformin as the first-line treatment.

Project description:ObjectivesTo compare the risk of cardiovascular events from the initiation of therapy between metformin and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) as first-line therapy.DesignRetrospective cohort study using two claims databases.SettingThe MDV database (provided by Medical Data Vision) comprised data from acute care hospitals, and the JMDC database (provided by JMDC) comprised data from individuals covered by health insurance societies.ParticipantsThose who were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes at ≥18 years, prescribed metformin or DPP-4i as the first-line hypoglycaemic agent, had medical records of ≥6 months before the index prescription and had available glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) data for the period, including the index date and 30 days before it (defined as the baseline) were included. Those diagnosed with type 1 diabetes and/or a history of myocardial infarction (MI) or cerebrovascular diseases were excluded.Primary and secondary outcome measuresThe outcomes were cumulative risks from Kaplan-Meier curves or HRs of patients prescribed metformin compared with DPP-4i. The primary endpoint was the diagnosis of MI or stroke associated with hospitalisation. Patient demographics, prescribed drugs and laboratory test values of HbA1c and estimated glomerular filtration rate at baseline were adjusted. The study period starting from the index included treatment after initial monotherapy.ResultsOverall, 2089 and 6686 patients in the MDV database and 1506 and 3635 in the JMDC database were prescribed metformin and DPP-4i, respectively. The HR of the primary endpoint was 0.879 with no statistical significance (95% CI 0.534 to 1.448, p=0.613) in the MDV database, while it was significantly lower, 0.398 (95% CI 0.213 to 0.742, 0.004) in the JMDC database.ConclusionsPatients who received metformin as first-line therapy may have reduced cardiovascular events than those receiving DPP-4i. This study conforms to previous Japanese database studies, despite the consideration of its limitation being an observational design.

Project description:Data regarding the safety of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment is limited.To compare the adverse events (AEs) induced by aflibercept and ranibizumab using a spontaneous reporting system and determine the signals.We used data from the Korea Institute of Drug Safety & Risk Management-Korea Adverse Event Reporting System Database (KIDS-KD), collected between 2007 and 2016. Differences in patient demographics, report type, reporter, causality, and serious-AEs between aflibercept and ranibizumab were compared. Metrics including proportional reporting ratio (PRR), reporting odds ratio (ROR), and information component (IC), were used to compare signals with the AEs on the drug labels in the United States of America and Korea. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify AEs that are more likely to occur with drug use.A total of 32 aflibercept and 103 ranibizumab cases of AEs were identified. The proportion of AEs that were reported voluntarily was higher with aflibercept (50.5%) use than ranibizumab (4.9%), whereas the AEs reported by post-marketing surveillance were higher with ranibizumab (46.6%) use than aflibercept (31.3%). The percentage of AEs in patients >60 years old, reports by consumers, and the ratio of SAEs to AEs associated with aflibercept (84. %, 9.4%, and 75.0%, respectively) were higher than those of ranibizumab (77.7%, 1.9%, and 19.4%, respectively). The number of newly detected AEs after aflibercept and ranibizumab treatment was 3 and 8, respectively. Among these, conjunctivitis and medicine ineffective were not included on the aflibercept and ranibizumab labels, respectively. Endophthalmitis (OR 6.96, 95% CI 2.74-17.73) was more likely to be reported in patients with aflibercept than in patients without aflibercept, whereas medicine ineffective (OR 18.49, 95% CI 2.39-143.29) and retinal disorder (OR 7.03, 95% CI 1.60-30.96) were more likely to be reported in patients with ranibizumab than in patients without ranibizumab.New signals have been identified for aflibercept and ranibizumab. Further research is necessary to evaluate the causality of AEs that were detected as signals in this study.

Dataset Information

Effect of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors vs. Metformin on Major Cardiovascular Events Using Spontaneous Reporting System and Real-World Database Study.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Effect of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors vs. Metformin on Major Cardiovascular Events Using Spontaneous Reporting System and Real-World Database Study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets