Quality control requirements for the correct annotation of lipidomics data.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Kofeler HC
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8346590 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Aug
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Quality control requirements for the correct annotation of lipidomics data.
Köfeler Harald C HC Eichmann Thomas O TO Ahrends Robert R Bowden John A JA Danne-Rasche Niklas N Dennis Edward A EA Fedorova Maria M Griffiths William J WJ Han Xianlin X Hartler Jürgen J Holčapek Michal M Jirásko Robert R Koelmel Jeremy P JP Ejsing Christer S CS Liebisch Gerhard G Ni Zhixu Z O'Donnell Valerie B VB Quehenberger Oswald O Schwudke Dominik D Shevchenko Andrej A Wakelam Michael J O MJO Wenk Markus R MR Wolrab Denise D Ekroos Kim K
Nature communications 20210806 1
Similar Datasets
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC8346504 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a major public health priority with a large socioeconomic burden and complex etiology. The Alzheimer Disease Metabolomics Consortium (ADMC) and the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) aim to gain new biological insights in the disease etiology. We report here an untargeted lipidomics of serum specimens of 806 subjects within the ADNI1 cohort (188 AD, 392 mild cognitive impairment and 226 cognitively normal subjects) along with 83 quality control samples. Lipids were detected and measured using an ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography quadruple/time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC-QTOF MS) instrument operated in both negative and positive electrospray ionization modes. The dataset includes a total 513 unique lipid species out of which 341 are known lipids. For over 95% of the detected lipids, a relative standard deviation of better than 20% was achieved in the quality control samples, indicating high technical reproducibility. Association modeling of this dataset and available clinical, metabolomics and drug-use data will provide novel insights into the AD etiology. These datasets are available at the ADNI repository at http://adni.loni.usc.edu/.
| S-EPMC6244184 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundSystematic description of library quality and sequencing performance of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data is imperative for subsequent downstream modules, including re-pooling libraries. While several packages have been developed to visualise quality control (QC) metrics for scRNA-seq data, they do not include expression-based QC to discriminate between true variation and background noise.ResultsWe present scQCEA (acronym of the single-cell RNA sequencing Quality Control and Enrichment Analysis), an R package to generate reports of process optimisation metrics for comparing sets of samples and visual evaluation of quality scores. scQCEA can import data from 10X or other single-cell platforms and includes functions for generating an interactive report of QC metrics for multi-omics data. In addition, scQCEA provides automated cell type annotation on scRNA-seq data using differential gene expression patterns for expression-based quality control. We provide a repository of reference gene sets, including 2348 marker genes, which are exclusively expressed in 95 human and mouse cell types. Using scRNA-seq data from 56 gene expressions and V(D)J T cell replicates, we show how scQCEA can be applied for the visual evaluation of quality scores for sets of samples. In addition, we use the summary of QC measures from 342 human and mouse shallow-sequenced gene expression profiles to specify optimal sequencing requirements to run a cell-type enrichment analysis function.ConclusionsThe open-source R tool will allow examining biases and outliers over biological and technical measures, and objective selection of optimal cluster numbers before downstream analysis. scQCEA is available at https://isarnassiri.github.io/scQCEA/ as an R package. Full documentation, including an example, is provided on the package website.
| S-EPMC10327311 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Microarray expression studies suffer from the problem of batch effects and other unwanted variation. Many methods have been proposed to adjust microarray data to mitigate the problems of unwanted variation. Several of these methods rely on factor analysis to infer the unwanted variation from the data. A central problem with this approach is the difficulty in discerning the unwanted variation from the biological variation that is of interest to the researcher. We present a new method, intended for use in differential expression studies, that attempts to overcome this problem by restricting the factor analysis to negative control genes. Negative control genes are genes known a priori not to be differentially expressed with respect to the biological factor of interest. Variation in the expression levels of these genes can therefore be assumed to be unwanted variation. We name this method "Remove Unwanted Variation, 2-step" (RUV-2). We discuss various techniques for assessing the performance of an adjustment method and compare the performance of RUV-2 with that of other commonly used adjustment methods such as Combat and Surrogate Variable Analysis (SVA). We present several example studies, each concerning genes differentially expressed with respect to gender in the brain and find that RUV-2 performs as well or better than other methods. Finally, we discuss the possibility of adapting RUV-2 for use in studies not concerned with differential expression and conclude that there may be promise but substantial challenges remain.
| S-EPMC3577104 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Lipid analysis gained significant importance due to the enormous range of lipid functions, e.g., energy storage, signaling, or structural components. Whole lipidomes can be quantitatively studied in-depth thanks to recent analytical advancements. However, the systematic comparison of thousands of distinct lipidomes remains challenging. We introduce LipidSpace, a standalone tool for analyzing lipidomes by assessing their structural and quantitative differences. A graph-based comparison of lipid structures is the basis for calculating structural space models and subsequently computing lipidome similarities. When adding study variables such as body weight or health condition, LipidSpace can determine lipid subsets across all lipidomes that describe these study variables well by utilizing machine-learning approaches. The user-friendly GUI offers four built-in tutorials and interactive visual interfaces with pdf export. Many supported data formats allow an efficient (re)analysis of data sets from different sources. An integrated interactive workflow guides the user through the quality control steps. We used this suite to reanalyze and combine already published data sets (e.g., one with about 2500 samples and 576 lipids in one run) and made additional discoveries to the published conclusions with the potential to fill gaps in the current lipid biology understanding. LipidSpace is available for Windows or Linux (https://lifs-tools.org).
| S-EPMC10585661 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionMass spectrometry imaging (MSI) experiments result in complex multi-dimensional datasets, which require specialist data analysis tools.ObjectivesWe have developed massPix-an R package for analysing and interpreting data from MSI of lipids in tissue.MethodsmassPix produces single ion images, performs multivariate statistics and provides putative lipid annotations based on accurate mass matching against generated lipid libraries.ResultsClassification of tissue regions with high spectral similarly can be carried out by principal components analysis (PCA) or k-means clustering.ConclusionmassPix is an open-source tool for the analysis and statistical interpretation of MSI data, and is particularly useful for lipidomics applications.
| S-EPMC5608769 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundHealthcare-associated infections (HAIs) represent a major Public Health issue. Hospital-based prevalence studies are a common tool of HAI surveillance, but data quality problems and non-representativeness can undermine their reliability.MethodsThis study proposes three algorithms that, given a convenience sample and variables relevant for the outcome of the study, select a subsample with specific distributional characteristics, boosting either representativeness (Probability and Distance procedures) or risk factors' balance (Uniformity procedure). A "Quality Score" (QS) was also developed to grade sampled units according to data completeness and reliability. The methodologies were evaluated through bootstrapping on a convenience sample of 135 hospitals collected during the 2016 Italian Point Prevalence Survey (PPS) on HAIs.ResultsThe QS highlighted wide variations in data quality among hospitals (median QS 52.9 points, range 7.98-628, lower meaning better quality), with most problems ascribable to ward and hospital-related data reporting. Both Distance and Probability procedures produced subsamples with lower distributional bias (Log-likelihood score increased from 7.3 to 29 points). The Uniformity procedure increased the homogeneity of the sample characteristics (e.g., - 58.4% in geographical variability). The procedures selected hospitals with higher data quality, especially the Probability procedure (lower QS in 100% of bootstrap simulations). The Distance procedure produced lower HAI prevalence estimates (6.98% compared to 7.44% in the convenience sample), more in line with the European median.ConclusionsThe QS and the subsampling procedures proposed in this study could represent effective tools to improve the quality of prevalence studies, decreasing the biases that can arise due to non-probabilistic sample collection.
| S-EPMC8088017 | biostudies-literature
Project description:SummaryVirus sequence data are an essential resource for reconstructing spatiotemporal dynamics of viral spread as well as to inform treatment and prevention strategies. However, the potential benefit of these applications critically depends on accurate and correctly annotated alignments of genetically heterogeneous data. VIRULIGN was built for fast codon-correct alignments of large datasets, with standardized and formalized genome annotation and various alignment export formats.Availability and implementationVIRULIGN is freely available at https://github.com/rega-cev/virulign as an open source software project.Supplementary informationSupplementary data is available at Bioinformatics online.
| S-EPMC6513156 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Biological processes are accomplished by the coordinated action of gene products. Gene products often participate in multiple processes, and can therefore be annotated to multiple Gene Ontology (GO) terms. Nevertheless, processes that are functionally, temporally and/or spatially distant may have few gene products in common, and co-annotation to unrelated processes probably reflects errors in literature curation, ontology structure or automated annotation pipelines. We have developed an annotation quality control workflow that uses rules based on mutually exclusive processes to detect annotation errors, based on and validated by case studies including the three we present here: fission yeast protein-coding gene annotations over time; annotations for cohesin complex subunits in human and model species; and annotations using a selected set of GO biological process terms in human and five model species. For each case study, we reviewed available GO annotations, identified pairs of biological processes which are unlikely to be correctly co-annotated to the same gene products (e.g. amino acid metabolism and cytokinesis), and traced erroneous annotations to their sources. To date we have generated 107 quality control rules, and corrected 289 manual annotations in eukaryotes and over 52 700 automatically propagated annotations across all taxa.
| S-EPMC7536087 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Despite ethical and historical arguments for removing race from clinical algorithms, the consequences of removal remain unclear. Here, we highlight a largely undiscussed consideration in this debate: varying data quality of input features across race groups. For example, family history of cancer is an essential predictor in cancer risk prediction algorithms but is less reliably documented for Black participants and may therefore be less predictive of cancer outcomes. Using data from the Southern Community Cohort Study, we assessed whether race adjustments could allow risk prediction models to capture varying data quality by race, focusing on colorectal cancer risk prediction. We analyzed 77,836 adults with no history of colorectal cancer at baseline. The predictive value of self-reported family history was greater for White participants than for Black participants. We compared two cancer risk prediction algorithms-a race-blind algorithm which included standard colorectal cancer risk factors but not race, and a race-adjusted algorithm which additionally included race. Relative to the race-blind algorithm, the race-adjusted algorithm improved predictive performance, as measured by goodness of fit in a likelihood ratio test (P-value: <0.001) and area under the receiving operating characteristic curve among Black participants (P-value: 0.006). Because the race-blind algorithm underpredicted risk for Black participants, the race-adjusted algorithm increased the fraction of Black participants among the predicted high-risk group, potentially increasing access to screening. More broadly, this study shows that race adjustments may be beneficial when the data quality of key predictors in clinical algorithms differs by race group.
| S-EPMC11348319 | biostudies-literature