Dataset Information

Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of osteopontin expression in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Evaluation of the feasibility for osteopontin (OPN) to serve as a biomarker in the prognosis and clinical-pathological features of prostate cancer patients.

Methods

The original publications related to osteopontin and prostate cancer were comprehensively searched in the online databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Medline, Wanfang and China National Knowledge Infrastructure up to August 2019. Results were analyzed by Revman 5.3 and Stata 12.0.

Results

A total of 21 studies were included in the analysis and the result showed that the positive OPN expression group had a lower overall survival than the negative expression group (univariate: HR=2.32, 95%CI [1.74, 3.10], multivariate: HR=2.41, 95%CI [1.63, 3.57]) and a lower biochemical relapse-free survival than the negative group (univariate: HR=1.42, 95%CI [0.92, 2.17], multivariate: HR=1.61, 95%CI [1.39, 1.87]). In addition, there was a higher expression level of OPN in prostate cancer tissues than in normal prostate tissues (OR=46.55, 95%CI [12.85, 168.59], P<0.00001) and benign prostatic hyperplasia tissues (OR=11.07, 95%CI [3.43, 35.75], P<0.0001). Moreover, OPN positive expression was also related to high Gleason score (OR=2.64, 95%CI [1.49, 4.70], P=0.0009), high TNM stage (OR=3.15, 95%CI [1.60, 6.20, P=0.0009), high Whitmore-Jewett stage (OR=2.53, 95%CI [1.06, 6.03], P=0.04), high lymph node (OR=3.69, 95%CI [1.88, 7.23], P=0.0001), and distant metastasis (OR=8.10, 95%CI [2.94, 22.35], P=0.01). There was no difference observed in the differentiation of prostate cancer (OR=1.79, 95%CI [0.39, 8.33], P=0.46).

Conclusion

Osteopontin could be recognized as a promising diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for prostate cancer patients.

SUBMITTER: Yu A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8350436 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background:Nestin has been revealed to promote tumorigenesis, progression, metastasis, and angiogenesis of breast cancer. Although the prognostic and clinicopathological impact of nestin expression on breast cancer patients has been assessed in several independent studies, their results remained conflicting. Therefore, we performed this meta-analysis to elucidate the prognostic and clinicopathological association of nestin expression with breast cancer. Methods:A comprehensive literature search was performed in the electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and the Wangfang Data. The statistical analysis was conducted using Stata 15.0 and Review Manager 5.3. Results:A total of 15 studies with 6066 breast cancer patients were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled results indicated that positive expression of nestin was significantly associated with reduced breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS, univariate analysis, HR?=?2.11, 95% CI [1.79, 2.49], P?<?0.00001; multivariate analysis, HR?=?1.30, 95% CI [1.06, 1.60], P?=?0.01), worse overall survival (OS, univariate analysis, HR?=?1.88, 95% CI [1.31, 2.71], P?=?0.0007; multivariate analysis, HR?=?1.89, 95% CI [1.34, 2.67], P?=?0.0003) and poorer recurrence-free survival (univariate analysis, HR?=?2.60, 95% CI [1.52, 4.46], P?=?0.0005), but not with distant metastasis-free survival in univariate analysis (P?>?0.05). In addition, increased nestin expression was correlated with younger age, higher tumor grade, larger tumor size, positive blood vessel invasion and high vascular proliferation index, but not with lymph node metastasis or lymph vessel invasion. Nestin was preferentially expressed in invasive ductal carcinoma, triple-negative breast cancer and basal-like subtypes. Nestin expression was inversely associated with the expression of ER and PR, but not with HER-2. Conversely, nestin expression was positively correlated with the expression of basal-like markers CK5, P-cadherin and EGFR. Moreover, nestin expression was strongly associated with the presence of five basal-like profiles (BLP1-5). Conclusions:This meta-analysis revealed the prognostic value and clinicopathological significance of nestin expression in breast cancer. Nestin is an independent prognostic factor for worse BCSS and OS of breast cancer patients. Nestin is also a valuable biomarker for unfavorable clinicopathological features and tumor angiogenesis of breast cancer. Therefore, nestin is a promising therapeutic target for malignant breast cancer, especially for TNBC and basal-like phenotype.

Project description:The overexpression of phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (p-stat3) was detected in a variety of human tumors. The published studies on p-stat3 expression among gastric carcinoma patients remain controversial.In order to clarify the prognosis value of p-stat3 with overall survival and its association with clinicopathological characteristics in gastric carcinoma, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eligible studies were retrieved by searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Chinese biomedical literature service system databases.Studies described the association between p-stat3 expression and clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival in gastric carcinoma patients; p-stat3 expression was detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC).Odds ratio (OR) and hazard ratio (HR) were considered as a measure of evaluating the association in meta-analysis; I was used to assess the heterogeneity across studies; publication bias was assessed with funnel plot, Egger test, and Begg test.Twenty-three studies including 2872 patients which evaluated the p-stat3 expression by IHC in gastric carcinoma were included. The pooled HR (HR = 2.02, 95% CI: 1.49-2.73, P < 0.00001) indicated that the increased p-stat3 expression was significantly associated with poor overall survival. In addition, when we investigated the association between p-stat3 overexpression and clinicopathological characteristics of gastric carcinoma, we found that the increased p-stat3 expression was significantly associated with tumor differentiation (poorly vs well-moderately: OR = 3.70, 95% CI: 1.98-6.93, P < 0.0001) and lymph node metastasis (present vs absent: OR = 2.40, 95% CI: 1.28-4.50, P = 0.007).The different type of primary antibody was used; the assessment methods of p-stat3 positive expression were defined differently; the locations of p-stat3 expression were different; the method of extrapolating HR from Kaplan-Meier survival curves did seem to be less reliable than when HR was extracted directly from literatures; sample sizes, the age of patients, and the follow-up durations are different.In conclusion, our meta-analysis indicates that the increased p-stat3 expression may be not only predict poor prognosis, but also be associated with worse tumor differentiation and lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric carcinoma.

Project description:BackgroundGPRC5A is associated with various cancer initiation and progression. Controversial findings have been reported about GPRC5A prognostic characteristics, and no meta-analysis has been conducted to assess the relationship between GPRC5A and cancer prognosis. Therefore, the objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the overall prognostic effectiveness of GPRC5A.MethodsWe first conducted a systematic search in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, Cochrane, and WangFang databases. The hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI were then pooled to assess the associations between GPRC5A expression and overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), event-free survival (EFS), and clinicopathological characteristics. Chi-squared test and I2 statistics were completed to evaluate the heterogeneity in our study. A random-effects model was used when significant heterogeneity existed (I2>50% and p<0.05); otherwise, we chose the fixed-effect model. Subgroup analysis was stratified by tumor type, region, HR obtained measurements, and sample capacity to explore the source of heterogeneity.ResultsIn total, 15 studies with 624 patients met inclusion criteria of this study. Our results showed that higher expression of GPRC5A is associated with worse OS (HR:1.69 95%CI: 1.20-2.38 I2 = 75.6% p = 0.000), as well as worse EFS (HR:1.45 95%CI: 1.02-1.95 I2 = 0.0% p = 0.354). Subgroup analysis indicated that tumor type might be the source of high heterogeneity. Additionally, cancer patients with enhanced GPRC5A expression were more likely to lymph node metastasis (OR:1.95, 95%CI 1.33-2.86, I2 = 43.9%, p = 0.129) and advanced tumor stage (OR: 1.83, 95%CI 1.15-2.92, I2 = 61.3%, p = 0.035), but not associated with age, sex, differentiation, and distant metastasis.ConclusionGPRC5A can be a promising candidate for predicting medical outcomes and used for accurate diagnosis, prognosis prediction for patients with cancer; however, the predictive value of GPRC5A varies significantly according to cancer type. Further studies for this mechanism will be necessary to reveal novel insights into application of GPRC5A in cancers.