Dataset Information

Retrospective Camera-Based Respiratory Gating in Clinical Whole-Heart 4D Flow MRI.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Respiratory gating is generally recommended in 4D flow MRI of the heart to avoid blurring and motion artifacts. Recently, a novel automated contact-less camera-based respiratory motion sensor has been introduced.

Purpose

To compare camera-based respiratory gating (CAM) with liver-lung-navigator-based gating (NAV) and no gating (NO) for whole-heart 4D flow MRI.

Study type

Retrospective.

Subjects

Thirty two patients with a spectrum of cardiovascular diseases.

Field strength/sequence

A 3T, 3D-cine spoiled-gradient-echo-T1-weighted-sequence with flow-encoding in three spatial directions.

Assessment

Respiratory phases were derived and compared against each other by cross-correlation. Three radiologists/cardiologist scored images reconstructed with camera-based, navigator-based, and no respiratory gating with a 4-point Likert scale (qualitative analysis). Quantitative image quality analysis, in form of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and liver-lung-edge (LLE) for sharpness and quantitative flow analysis of the valves were performed semi-automatically.

Statistical tests

One-way repeated measured analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Wilks's lambda testing and follow-up pairwise comparisons. Significance level of P ≤ 0.05. Krippendorff's-alpha-test for inter-rater reliability.

Results

The respiratory signal analysis revealed that CAM and NAV phases were highly correlated (C = 0.93 ± 0.09, P < 0.01). Image scoring showed poor inter-rater reliability and no significant differences were observed (P ≥ 0.16). The image quality comparison showed that NAV and CAM were superior to NO with higher SNR (P = 0.02) and smaller LLE (P < 0.01). The quantitative flow analysis showed significant differences between the three respiratory-gated reconstructions in the tricuspid and pulmonary valves (P ≤ 0.05), but not in the mitral and aortic valves (P > 0.05). Pairwise comparisons showed that reconstructions without respiratory gating were different in flow measurements to either CAM or NAV or both, but no differences were found between CAM and NAV reconstructions.

Data conclusion

Camera-based respiratory gating performed as well as conventional liver-lung-navigator-based respiratory gating. Quantitative image quality analysis showed that both techniques were equivalent and superior to no-gating-reconstructions. Quantitative flow analysis revealed local flow differences (tricuspid/pulmonary valves) in images of no-gating-reconstructions, but no differences were found between images reconstructed with camera-based and navigator-based respiratory gating.

Level of evidence

3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

SUBMITTER: Gottwald LM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8359364 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can potentially be used for non-invasive screening of patients with stable angina pectoris to identify probable obstructive coronary artery disease. MRI-based coronary blood flow quantification has to date only been performed in a 2D fashion, limiting its clinical applicability. In this study, we propose a framework for coronary blood flow quantification using accelerated 4D flow MRI with respiratory motion correction and compressed sensing image reconstruction. We investigate its feasibility and repeatability in healthy subjects at rest. Fourteen healthy subjects received 8 times-accelerated 4D flow MRI covering the left coronary artery (LCA) with an isotropic spatial resolution of 1.0 mm3. Respiratory motion correction was performed based on 1) lung-liver navigator signal, 2) real-time monitoring of foot-head motion of the liver and LCA by a separate acquisition, and 3) rigid image registration to correct for anterior-posterior motion. Time-averaged diastolic LCA flow was determined, as well as time-averaged diastolic maximal velocity (VMAX) and diastolic peak velocity (VPEAK). 2D flow MRI scans of the LCA were acquired for reference. Scan-rescan repeatability and agreement between 4D flow MRI and 2D flow MRI were assessed in terms of concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and coefficient of variation (CV). The protocol resulted in good visibility of the LCA in 11 out of 14 subjects (six female, five male, aged 28 ± 4 years). The other 3 subjects were excluded from analysis. Time-averaged diastolic LCA flow measured by 4D flow MRI was 1.30 ± 0.39 ml/s and demonstrated good scan-rescan repeatability (CCC/CV = 0.79/20.4%). Time-averaged diastolic VMAX (17.2 ± 3.0 cm/s) and diastolic VPEAK (24.4 ± 6.5 cm/s) demonstrated moderate repeatability (CCC/CV = 0.52/19.0% and 0.68/23.0%, respectively). 4D flow- and 2D flow-based diastolic LCA flow agreed well (CCC/CV = 0.75/20.1%). Agreement between 4D flow MRI and 2D flow MRI was moderate for both diastolic VMAX and VPEAK (CCC/CV = 0.68/20.3% and 0.53/27.0%, respectively). In conclusion, the proposed framework of accelerated 4D flow MRI equipped with respiratory motion correction and compressed sensing image reconstruction enables repeatable diastolic LCA flow quantification that agrees well with 2D flow MRI.

Project description:Introduction4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a versatile technique to non-invasively assess cardiovascular hemodynamics. With developing technology, choice in sequences and acquisition parameters is expanding and it is important to assess if data acquired with these different variants can be directly compared, especially when combining datasets within research studies. For example, sequences may allow a choice in gating techniques or be limited to one method, yet there is not a direct comparison investigating how gating selection impacts quantifications of the great vessels, semilunar and atrioventricular valves and ventricles. Thus, this study investigated if quantifications across the heart from contemporary 4D flow sequences are comparable between two commonly used 4D flow sequences reliant on different ECG gating techniques.MethodsForty participants (33 healthy controls, seven patients with coronary artery disease and abnormal diastolic function) were prospectively recruited into a single-centre observational study to undergo a 3T-CMR exam. Two acquisitions, a k-t GRAPPA 4D flow with prospective gating (4Dprosp) and a modern compressed sensing 4D flow with retrospective gating (4Dretro), were acquired in each participant. Images were analyzed for volumes, flow rates and velocities in the vessels and four valves, and for biventricular kinetic energy and flow components. Data was compared for group differences with paired t-tests and for agreement with Bland-Altman and intraclass correlation (ICC).ResultsMeasurements primarily occurring during systole of the great vessels, semilunar valves and both left and right ventricles did not differ between acquisition types (p > 0.05 from t-test) and yielded good to excellent agreement (ICC: 0.75-0.99). Similar findings were observed for the majority of parameters dependent on early diastole. However, measurements occurring in late diastole or those reliant on the entire-cardiac cycle such as flow component volumes along with diastolic kinetic energy values were not similar between 4Dprosp and 4Dretro acquisitions resulting in poor agreement (ICC < 0.50).DiscussionDirect comparison of measurements between two different 4D flow acquisitions reliant on different gating methods demonstrated systolic and early diastolic markers across the heart should be compatible when comparing these two 4D flow sequences. On the other hand, late diastolic and intraventricular parameters should be compared with caution.

Project description:BackgroundPseudo-spiral Cartesian sampling with compressed sensing reconstruction has facilitated highly accelerated 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in various cardiovascular structures. However, unlike echo planar imaging (EPI)-accelerated 4D flow MRI, it has not been validated in whole-heart applications.HypothesisPseudo-spiral 4D flow MRI (PROUD [PROspective Undersampling in multiple Dimensions]) is comparable to EPI in robustness of valvular flow measurements and remains comparable as the undersampling factor is increased and scan time reduced.Study typeProspective.PopulationTwelve healthy subjects and eight patients with valvular regurgitation.Field strength/sequence3.0 T; PROUD and EPI 4D flow sequences, 2D flow and balanced steady-state free precession sequences.AssessmentValvular blood flow was quantified using valve tracking. PROUD- and EPI-based measurements of aortic (AV) and pulmonary (PV) flow volumes and left and right ventricular stroke volumes were tested for agreement with 2D MRI-based measurements. PROUD reconstructions with undersampling factors (R) of 9, 14, 28, and 56 were tested for intervalve consistency (per valve, compared to the other valves) and preservation of peak velocities and E/A ratios.Statistical testsWe used repeated measures ANOVA, Bland-Altman, Wilcoxon signed rank, and intraclass correlation coefficients. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsPROUD and EPI intervalve consistencies were not significantly different both in healthy subjects (valve-averaged mean difference [limits of agreement width]: 3.2 ± 0.8 [8.7 ± 1.1] mL/beat for PROUD, 5.5 ± 2.9 [13.7 ± 2.3] mL/beat for EPI, P = 0.07) and in patients with valvular regurgitation (2.3 ± 1.2 [15.3 ± 5.9] mL/beat for PROUD, 0.6 ± 0.6 [19.3 ± 2.9] mL/beat for EPI, P = 0.47). Agreement between EPI and PROUD was higher than between 4D flow (EPI or PROUD) and 2D MRI for forward flow, stroke volumes, and regurgitant volumes. Up to R = 28 in healthy subjects and R = 14 in patients with valvular regurgitation, PROUD intervalve consistency remained comparable to that of EPI. Peak velocities and E/A ratios were preserved up to R = 9.ConclusionPROUD is comparable to EPI in terms of intervalve consistency and may be used with higher undersampling factors to shorten scan times further.Level of evidence1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.

Project description:ObjectivesTo evaluate the feasibility of Doppler-ultrasound (DUS)-gated 4D flow MRI of the fetal great thoracic vessels at 3T in a clinical setting.MethodsSixteen consecutive fetuses (range 30+4-38+5 weeks) with (n = 11) and without (n = 5) cardiovascular anomalies underwent 4D flow MRI of the great thoracic vessels at 3T. Direct fetal cardiac gating was obtained using a MR-compatible DUS device. 4D flow MRI-based visualisation and quantification of four target regions (ascending aorta (AAo), descending aorta (DAo), main pulmonary artery (MPA), and ductus arteriosus (DA)) were performed using dedicated software.ResultsFetal 4D flow MRI of the great thoracic vessels was successful in 12/16 fetuses (75%) by adopting clinical 4D flow MR protocols in combination with direct fetal cardiac DUS-gating. Four datasets were excluded due to artefacts by fetal movement or maternal breathing. 4D flow MRI-derived time-velocity curves revealed typical arterial blood flow patterns in the aorta. 4D flow quantification was achieved for the pre-defined target regions. Average velocity and flow volume were 21.1 ± 5.2 cm/s and 6.0 ± 3.1 mL/s in the AAo, 24.3 ± 6.7 cm/s and 8.4 ± 3.7 mL/s in the DAo, 21.9 ± 6.4 cm/s and 7.8 ± 4.2 mL/s in the MPA, and 23.4 ± 4.7 cm/s and 5.9 ± 3.6 mL/s in the DA, respectively.ConclusionsCombination of DUS-gating of the fetal heart and 4D flow MRI allows comprehensive visualisation and quantification of haemodynamics in the fetal great thoracic vessels. DUS-gated fetal 4D flow MRI may provide a new diagnostic approach for prenatal assessment of blood flow haemodynamics.Key points• Fetal cardiac Doppler-ultrasound (DUS) gating and 4D flow MRI can be successfully combined. • DUS-gated fetal 4D flow MRI allowed visualisation and evaluation of streamline directionality, illustration of blood flow variations, and pulsatile arterial waveforms in the target vessels. • 4D flow MRI-based visualisation and quantification of the fetal great thoracic vessels were successful and flow metrics agreed with echocardiographic reference values.