Dataset Information

Diagnostic usefulness of subgenomic RNA detection of viable SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

The development of a rapid diagnostic test for viable SARS-CoV-2 is important for infection control. Real-time RT-PCR assays detect non-viable virus, and cell culture differentiates viable virus but it takes several weeks and is labour-intensive. Subgenomic RNAs may reflect replication-competent virus. We therefore evaluated the usefulness of subgenomic RNAs for diagnosing viable SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19.

Methods

Patients with various severities of confirmed COVID-19 were enrolled at a tertiary hospital between February and December 2020. RT-PCR assay results for genomic and subgenomic RNA of SARS-CoV-2 from nasopharyngeal swab, sputum and saliva specimens were compared with cell culture results.

Results

A total 189 specimens from 20 COVID-19 patients were tested in genomic and subgenomic PCR assays and cultured on Vero cells. Of these 189 samples, 62 (33%) gave positive culture results, 93 (49%) negative results and the remaining 34 (18%) indeterminate results. Compared with cell culture results, the sensitivities of genomic RNA and subgenomic RNA of the N and S genes were comparable at 100%, but the specificity of subgenomic RNA (N, 65% and S, 68%) was higher than that of genomic RNA (N, 23% and S, 17%, p < 0.001). The mean durations of positive culture and subgenomic RNA were 11.39 ± 10.34 and 13.75 ± 11.22 days after symptom onset (p 0.437), respectively, while that of genomic RNA was 22.85 ± 11.83 days after symptom onset (p < 0.001).

Discussion

Our comparison of subgenomic RNA detection with symptom duration and SARS-CoV-2 culture positivity provides a significant advancement on the transmissibility-based approach beyond the detection of SARS-CoV-2 genomic RNA, and warrants further studies on the development of better diagnostic strategy.

SUBMITTER: Kim JY

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8360988 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) studies have provided critical insight into the pathogenesis of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome CoronaVirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of COronaVIrus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). scRNAseq workflows are generally designed for the detection and quantification of eukaryotic host mRNAs and not viral RNAs. The performance of different scRNAseq methods to study SARS-CoV-2 RNAs has not been thoroughly evaluated. Here, we compare different scRNAseq methods for their ability to quantify and detect SARS-CoV-2 RNAs with a focus on subgenomic mRNAs (sgmRNAs), which are produced only during active viral replication and not present in viral particles. We present a data processing strategy, single cell CoronaVirus sequencing (scCoVseq), which quantifies reads unambiguously assigned to sgmRNAs or genomic RNA (gRNA). Compared to standard 10X Genomics Chromium Next GEM Single Cell 3' (10X 3') and Chromium Next GEM Single Cell V(D)J (10X 5') sequencing, we find that 10X 5' with an extended R1 sequencing strategy maximizes the unambiguous detection of sgmRNAs by increasing the number of reads spanning leader-sgmRNA junction sites. Differential gene expression testing and KEGG enrichment analysis of infected cells compared with bystander or mock cells showed an enrichment for COVID19-associated genes, supporting the ability of our method to accurately identify infected cells. Our method allows for quantification of coronavirus sgmRNA expression at single-cell resolution, and thereby supports high resolution studies of the dynamics of coronavirus RNA synthesis.ImportanceSingle cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) has emerged as a valuable tool to study host-viral interactions particularly in the context of COronaVIrus Disease-2019 (COVID-19). scRNAseq has been developed and optimized for analyzing eukaryotic mRNAs, and the ability of scRNAseq to measure RNAs produced by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has not been fully characterized. Here we compare the performance of different scRNAseq methods to detect and quantify SARS-CoV-2 RNAs and develop an analysis workflow to specifically quantify unambiguous reads derived from SARS-CoV-2 genomic RNA and subgenomic mRNAs. Our work demonstrates the strengths and limitations of scRNAseq to measure SARS-CoV-2 RNA and identifies experimental and analytical approaches that allow for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection and quantification. These developments will allow for studies of coronavirus RNA biogenesis at single-cell resolution to improve our understanding of viral pathogenesis.

Project description:The widespread Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by infection with the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Currently, we have a limited toolset available for visualizing SARS-CoV-2 in cells and tissues, particularly in tissues from patients who died from COVID-19. Generally, single-molecule RNA FISH techniques have shown mixed results in formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissues such as those preserved from human autopsies. Here, we present a platform for preparing autopsy tissue for visualizing SARS-CoV-2 RNA using RNA FISH with amplification by hybridization chain reaction (HCR). We developed probe sets that target different regions of SARS-CoV-2 (including ORF1a and N) as well as probe sets that specifically target SARS-CoV-2 subgenomic mRNAs. We validated these probe sets in cell culture and tissues (lung, lymph node, and placenta) from infected patients. Using this technology, we observe distinct subcellular localization patterns of the ORF1a and N regions, with the ORF1a concentrated around the nucleus and the N showing a diffuse distribution across the cytoplasm. In human lung tissue, we performed multiplexed RNA FISH HCR for SARS-CoV-2 and cell-type specific marker genes. We found viral RNA in cells containing the alveolar type 2 (AT2) cell marker gene ( SFTPC ) and the alveolar macrophage marker gene ( MARCO ), but did not identify viral RNA in cells containing the alveolar type 1 (AT1) cell marker gene ( AGER ). Moreover, we observed distinct subcellular localization patterns of viral RNA in AT2 cells and alveolar macrophages, consistent with phagocytosis of infected cells. In sum, we demonstrate the use of RNA FISH HCR for visualizing different RNA species from SARS-CoV-2 in cell lines and FFPE autopsy specimens. Furthermore, we multiplex this assay with probes for cellular genes to determine what cell-types are infected within the lung. We anticipate that this platform could be broadly useful for studying SARS-CoV-2 pathology in tissues as well as extended for other applications including investigating the viral life cycle, viral diagnostics, and drug screening.