Dataset Information

Comparison of targeted metagenomics and IS-Pro methods for analysing the lung microbiome.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Targeted metagenomics and IS-Pro method are two of the many methods that have been used to study the microbiome. The two methods target different regions of the 16 S rRNA gene. The aim of this study was to compare targeted metagenomics and IS-Pro methods for the ability to discern the microbial composition of the lung microbiome of COPD patients.

Methods

Spontaneously expectorated sputum specimens were collected from COPD patients. Bacterial DNA was extracted and used for targeted metagenomics and IS-Pro method. The analysis was performed using QIIME2 (targeted metagenomics) and IS-Pro software (IS-Pro method). Additionally, a laboratory cost per isolate and time analysis was performed for each method.

Results

Statistically significant differences were observed in alpha diversity when targeted metagenomics and IS-Pro methods' data were compared using the Shannon diversity measure (p-value = 0.0006) but not with the Simpson diversity measure (p-value = 0.84). Distinct clusters with no overlap between the two technologies were observed for beta diversity. Targeted metagenomics had a lower relative abundance of phyla, such as the Proteobacteria, and higher relative abundance of phyla, such as Firmicutes when compared to the IS-Pro method. Haemophilus, Prevotella and Streptococcus were most prevalent genera across both methods. Targeted metagenomics classified 23 % (144/631) of OTUs to a species level, whereas IS-Pro method classified 86 % (55/64) of OTUs to a species level. However, unclassified OTUs accounted for a higher relative abundance when using the IS-Pro method (35 %) compared to targeted metagenomics (5 %). The two methods performed comparably in terms of cost and time; however, the IS-Pro method was more user-friendly.

Conclusions

It is essential to understand the value of different methods for characterisation of the microbiome. Targeted metagenomics and IS-Pro methods showed differences in ability in identifying and characterising OTUs, diversity and microbial composition of the lung microbiome. The IS-Pro method might miss relevant species and could inflate the abundance of Proteobacteria. However, the IS-Pro kit identified most of the important lung pathogens, such as Burkholderia and Pseudomonas and may work in a more diagnostics-orientated setting. Both methods were comparable in terms of cost and time; however, the IS-Pro method was easier to use.

SUBMITTER: Goolam Mahomed T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8371770 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Bovine mastitis is a multi-etiological and complex disease, resulting in serious economic consequences for dairy farmers and industry. In recent years, the microbiological evaluation of raw milk has been investigated in-depth using next-generation sequencing approaches such as metataxonomic analysis. Despite this, host DNA is a major concern in the shotgun metagenomic sequencing of microbial communities in milk samples, and it represents a big challenge. In this study, we aimed to evaluate different methods for host DNA depletion and/or microbial DNA enrichment and assess the use of PCR-based whole genome amplification in milk samples with high somatic cell count (SCC) by using short- and long-read sequencing technologies. Our results evidenced that DNA extraction performed differently in terms of host DNA removal, impacting metagenome composition and functional profiles.. Moreover, the ratio of SCC/bacteria ultimately impacts microbial DNA yield, and samples with low SCC (SCC below 100,000 cells/mL) are the most problematic. When milk samples with high SCC (SCC above 200,000 cells/mL) underwent multiple-displacement amplification (MDA), we successfully recovered high-quality metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs), and long-read sequencing was feasible even for samples with low DNA concentration. By associating MDA and short-read sequencing, we recovered two times more MAGs than in untreated samples, and an ongoing co-infection not reported by traditional methods was detected for mastitis pathogen. Overall, this new approach will improve the detection of mastitis-associated microorganisms and make it possible to examine host-microbiome interactions in bovine mastitis.IMPORTANCENext-generation sequencing technologies have been widely used to gain new insights into the diversity of the microbial community of milk samples and dairy products for different purposes such as microbial safety, profiling of starter cultures, and host-microbiome interactions. Milk is a complex food matrix, and additionally, the presence of host nucleic acid sequences is considered a contaminant in untargeted high-throughput sequencing studies. Therefore, genomic-centric metagenomic studies of milk samples focusing on the health-disease status in dairy cattle are still scarce, which makes it difficult to evaluate the microbial ecophysiology of bovine hindmilk. This study provides an alternative method for genome-centric metagenome studies applied to hindmilk samples with high somatic cell content, which is indispensable to examining host-microbiome interactions in bovine mastitis.

Project description:Background: Integrated microbiome and metabolomics analyses hold the potential to reveal interactions between host and microbiota in relation to disease risks. However, there are few studies evaluating how field methods influence fecal microbiome characterization and metabolomics profiling. Methods: Five fecal collection methods [immediate freezing at -20°C without preservative, OMNIgene GUT, 95% ethanol, RNAlater, and Flinders Technology Associates (FTA) cards] were used to collect 40 fecal samples from eight healthy volunteers. We performed gut microbiota 16S rRNA sequencing, untargeted metabolomics profiling, and targeted metabolomics focusing on short chained fatty acids (SCFAs). Metrics included α-diversity and β-diversity as well as distributions of predominant phyla. To evaluate the concordance with the "gold standard" immediate freezing, the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for alternate fecal collection systems were calculated. Correlations between SCFAs and gut microbiota were also examined. Results: The FTA cards had the highest ICCs compared to the immediate freezing method for α-diversity indices (ICCs = 0.96, 0.96, 0.76 for Shannon index, Simpson's Index, Chao-1 Index, respectively), followed by OMNIgene GUT, RNAlater, and 95% ethanol. High ICCs (all >0.88) were observed for all methods for the β-diversity metric. For untargeted metabolomics, in comparison to immediate freezing which detected 621 metabolites at ≥75% detectability level, 95% ethanol showed the largest overlapping set of metabolites (n = 430; 69.2%), followed by FTA cards (n = 330; 53.1%) and OMNIgene GUT (n = 213; 34.3%). Both OMNIgene GUT (ICCs = 0.82, 0.93, 0.64) and FTA cards (ICCs = 0.87, 0.85, 0.54) had acceptable ICCs for the top three predominant SCFAs (butyric acid, propionic acid and acetic acid). Nominally significant correlations between bacterial genera and SCFAs (P < 0.05) were observed in fecal samples collected by different methods. Of note, a high correlation between the genus Blautia (known butyrate producer) and butyric acid was observed for both immediate freezing (r = 0.83) and FTA cards (r = 0.74). Conclusions: Four alternative fecal collection methods are generally comparable with immediate freezing, but there are differences in certain measures of the gut microbiome and fecal metabolome across methods. Choice of method depends on the research interests, simplicity of fecal collection procedures and ease of transportation to the lab, especially for large epidemiological studies.