Dataset Information

Susceptibility loci and polygenic architecture highlight population specific and common genetic features in inguinal hernias: genetics in inguinal hernias.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The underlying pathology of inguinal hernia is still not fully known; thus, further investigations of genetic backgrounds is needed. Here, we aimed to identify genetic factors attributing to inguinal hernias and explore the polygenic architecture of which some components are population-specific, while others are more common among populations.

Methods

We performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) on subjects with inguinal hernias using BioBank Japan (BBJ) data with 1,983 cases and 172,507 controls, followed by a trans-ethnic meta-analysis with UK Biobank (UKBB) data. We performed downstream analyses in order to identify the mechanisms underlying inguinal hernias supported by genetic findings.

Findings

We identified a locus closest to ELN, which encodes elastin, at the GWAS significant level. The trans-ethnic meta-analysis revealed 23 additional significant loci, including five loci newly identified not significant in BBJ or UKBB GWAS: TGFB2, RNA5SP214/VGLL2, LOC646588, HMCN2, and ATP5F1CP1/CDKN3. Downstream analyses revealed the overlap of GWAS significant signals in extracellular components, including elastin fiber formation. We also found a highly shared polygenic architecture across different populations (trans-ethnic genetic-effect correlation = 0•77, standard error = 0•26) and population-specific lead variants in ELN, indicating the critical role of elastin in inguinal hernias.

Interpretation

We identified a significant locus of the ELN gene in the Japanese population and five additional loci across different populations. Downstream analyses revealed highly shared genetic architectures across populations and highlighted the important roles of extracellular components in the development of inguinal hernias. These findings deepen our understanding of the mechanisms underlying inguinal hernia.

Funding

The Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) (Grant Number: JP19km0605001).

SUBMITTER: Hikino K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8374389 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPrevious genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified 42 loci (P < 5 × 10-8) associated with risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Expanded consortium efforts facilitating the discovery of additional susceptibility loci may capture unexplained familial risk.MethodsWe conducted a GWAS in European descent CRC cases and control subjects using a discovery-replication design, followed by examination of novel findings in a multiethnic sample (cumulative n = 163 315). In the discovery stage (36 948 case subjects/30 864 control subjects), we identified genetic variants with a minor allele frequency of 1% or greater associated with risk of CRC using logistic regression followed by a fixed-effects inverse variance weighted meta-analysis. All novel independent variants reaching genome-wide statistical significance (two-sided P < 5 × 10-8) were tested for replication in separate European ancestry samples (12 952 case subjects/48 383 control subjects). Next, we examined the generalizability of discovered variants in East Asians, African Americans, and Hispanics (12 085 case subjects/22 083 control subjects). Finally, we examined the contributions of novel risk variants to familial relative risk and examined the prediction capabilities of a polygenic risk score. All statistical tests were two-sided.ResultsThe discovery GWAS identified 11 variants associated with CRC at P < 5 × 10-8, of which nine (at 4q22.2/5p15.33/5p13.1/6p21.31/6p12.1/10q11.23/12q24.21/16q24.1/20q13.13) independently replicated at a P value of less than .05. Multiethnic follow-up supported the generalizability of discovery findings. These results demonstrated a 14.7% increase in familial relative risk explained by common risk alleles from 10.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 7.9% to 13.7%; known variants) to 11.9% (95% CI = 9.2% to 15.5%; known and novel variants). A polygenic risk score identified 4.3% of the population at an odds ratio for developing CRC of at least 2.0.ConclusionsThis study provides insight into the architecture of common genetic variation contributing to CRC etiology and improves risk prediction for individualized screening.

Project description:ImportanceDespite availability of evidence-based guidelines for surgery, many patients receive guideline-discordant care. Reasons for this are largely unknown. For example, evidence-based guidelines recommend a minimally invasive approach for persons with bilateral or recurrent unilateral inguinal hernias. Benefits are also noted for primary unilateral inguinal hernia. However, findings from previous quantitative research indicate that only 26% of patients receive this treatment and only 42% of surgeons offer a minimally invasive approach, even for recurrent or bilateral hernias.ObjectiveTo explore factors associated with surgeon choice of approach (minimally invasive vs open) in inguinal hernia repair as a tool to gain an understanding of guideline-discordant care.Design, setting, and participantsQualitative study performed as part of a larger explanatory sequential mixed methods design. Purposive sampling was used to recruit 21 practicing surgeons from a large statewide quality collaborative who were diverse with regard to practice type, geographic location, and surgical specialty. Qualitative interviews consisted of a clinical vignette, followed by semi-structured interview questions. Through thematic analysis using qualitive data analysis software, patterns within the data were located, analyzed, and identified. All data were collected between April 24 and July 31, 2018.ExposureClinical vignette as part of the qualitative interviews.Main outcomes and measuresCapture of surgical approaches and factors motivating decision-making for inguinal hernia repair.ResultsOf the 21 participating surgeons, 17 (81%) were men, 18 (86%) were White, and all were 35 years of age or older. Data revealed 3 dominant themes: surgeon preference and autonomy (eg, favoring one approach over the other), access and resources (eg, availability of robot), and patient characteristics (eg, age, comorbidities).Conclusions and relevanceDecision-making for the approach to inguinal hernia repair is largely influenced by surgeon preference and access to resources rather than patient factors. Although a one-size-fits-all approach is not recommended, the operative approach should ideally be informed by patient factors, including hernia characteristics. Addressing surgeon preference and available resources with a clinician-facing decision aid may provide an opportunity to optimize care for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair.