Dataset Information

The extracellular matrix complexity of idiopathic epiretinal membranes and the bilaminar arrangement of the associated internal limiting membrane in the posterior retina.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

To study the composition of the internal limiting membrane (ILM) of the retina, the extracellular matrix (ECM) of idiopathic epiretinal membranes (iERMs), and the relationships occurring between the two membranes.

Methods

Forty-six iERMs, 24 of them associated with the ILM, were collected and included in this study. The investigation has been carried out by immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy on glutaraldehyde- and osmium-fixed epon-embedded samples and on frozen samples. Sections were double or triple labelled with antibodies against vimentin; collagens I, III, IV, α5(IV), and VI; laminin 1 + 2; laminin α2-, α4-, α5-, β1-, β2-, β3-, γ1-, and γ2-chains; entactin; and fibronectin.

Results

iERM thickness was not uniform. Almost 14% of iERMs showed thickenings due to folding of their ECM component under the cell layer. The vitreal side of iERMs was often shorter than the attached ILM. In this case, the ILM resulted folded under the iERM. ILMs contained laminin 111; laminin α2-, α5-, β1-, β2-, and γ1-chains; entactin; collagens I; α5(IV); [α1(IV)]₂α2(IV); and VI. Laminins, entactin, and α5(IV) were gathered on the retinal half of the ILM, whereas collagens [α1(IV)]₂α2(IV) and I were restricted to the vitreal side. Collagen VI was detected on both sides of the ILM. iERMs expressed laminin 111, collagens III, [α1(IV)]₂α2(IV) and VI, entactin, and fibronectin. Entactin co-localized with laminins and collagen IV.

Conclusions

Analysis of laminins and collagen chain expression indicates that ILM contains laminin 111 (former laminin 1), laminin 521 (former laminin 11), laminin 211 (former laminin 2), collagen [α1(IV)]₂α2(IV), and collagen α3(IV)α4(IV)α5. In contrast, iERMs express only collagen [α1(IV)]₂α2(IV) and laminin 111. In addition, both iERMs and ILMs contain entactin. The presence of three major constituents of the basement membranes co-localized together in iERMs is suggestive for a deranged process of basement membrane formation which fails to assemble properly. In view of the many interactions occurring among its proteins, the ECM of either the iERMs or the ILMs can account for their reciprocal adhesiveness. In addition, the peculiar deposition of the ECM observed in some samples of iERM is suggestive for its involvement in the formation of macular puckers.

SUBMITTER: Altera A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8380574 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Studies on vitrectomy with and without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) have yielded uncertain results regarding clinical outcomes and recurrence rates.To compare the clinical outcomes of vitrectomy with and without ILM peeling for idiopathic ERM.Databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, Google Scholar, CNKI databases, FDA.gov, and ClinicalTrials.gov, published until July 2016, were searched to identify studies comparing the clinical outcomes following vitrectomy with ERM and ILM peeling and with only ERM peeling, for treating idiopathic ERM. Studies with sufficient data were selected. Pooled results were expressed as mean differences (MDs) and risk ratios (RRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for vitrectomy with and without ILM peeling with regard to postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), and ERM recurrence rate.Eleven retrospective studies and one randomized controlled trial involving 756 eyes were identified. This demonstrated that the postoperative BCVA within 12 months was significantly better in the non-ILM peeling group (MD = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.00 to 0.08; P = 0.0460), but that the patients in the ILM peeling group had significantly better postoperative BCVA after 18 months (MD = -0.13, 95% CI: -0.23 to -0.04; P = 0.0049) than did those in the non-ILM peeling group. The non-ILM peeling group exhibited a higher reduction in postoperative CRT (MD = 51.55, 95% CI:-84.23 to -18.88; P = 0.0020) and a higher recurrence rate of ERM (RR = 0.34, 95% CI:0.16 to 0.72; P = 0.0048) than did the ILM peeling group. However, the improvement rates of BCVA (RR = 1.03, 95% CI:0.72 to 1.47; P = 0.8802) and postoperative CRTs (MD = 18.15, 95% CI:-2.29 to 38.60; P = 0.0818) were similar between the two groups.Vitrectomy with ILM peeling results in better visual improvement in long-term follow-ups and lower ERM recurrence rates, and vitrectomy with only ERM peeling is more efficacious in reduction of CRT than is vitrectomy with ILM peeling.

Project description:BackgroundAlthough previously published meta-analyses have compared the surgical effects between the methods of Idiopathic epiretinal membrane (iERM) removal with or without ILM peeling, they did not reach an agreement.PurposeWe aimed to provide more evidence for the treatment of iERM and whether additional ILM peeling was better or not by analyzing more updated studies and randomized control trials (RCTs).MethodThe search was conducted in Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Open Grey without language limitation and the studies included were from inception to December 2019. All studies of iERM with or without ILM peeling showed at least one of outcomes, such as best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT) and recurrence of ERM. The pooled results between above groups were showed by the mean differences (MDs) and risk ratios (RR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).ResultIn total, 1645 eyes of five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and fifteen retrospective studies were included. The short-term (<12 months) BCVA improvement in both groups showed no significant difference (MD = -0.01; 95% CI = -0.02 to 0.01; P = 0.36). However, the BCVA improvement was significantly better in ILM peeling eyes than in those without ILM peeling when considering the risk bias (MD = -0.04; 95% CI = -0.07 to -0.01; P = 0.008). The short-term (<12 months) CMT had a higher reduction in non ILM peeling group (MD = -9.02; 95% CI = -12.51 to -5.54; P < 0.00001) and the recurrence of ERM in ILM peeling group was lower (P < 0.00001). The long-term (≥12months) BCVA improvement ((MD = -0.00; 95% CI = -0.03 to 0.03; P = 0.97) and reduction of long-term (≥12months) CMT (MD = -1.14; 95% CI = -7.14 to -4.86; P = 0.71) were similar in both groups.ConclusionBy considering the risk of bias, we should determine whether ILM peeling is beneficial for short-term changes in BCVA in patients with iERM. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to confirm this. iERM removal without ILM peeling can improve the short-term decrease in CMT and ILM peeling decreases the recurrence of ERM, but the long-term changes in BCVA and CMT are similar with or without ILM peeling. There is a need for a true large scale randomized trial that will also include microperimetry and other functional measures.