Dataset Information

Novel spatial–temporal image correlation derived indices of tissue vascular impedance: A variability study

ABSTRACT: Abstract

Objectives

4D (3D + time) indices of tissue impedance using power Doppler (PD) ultrasound (US) can be measured with spatial–temporal image correlation (STIC) imaging. We wished to evaluate their repeatability and their influence under changes to US machine settings and regional differences within the placenta.

Methods

A total of 46 healthy women were recruited at 20–34 weeks of gestation. A total of 9940 3D frames from 644 4D data sets were analysed providing both 3D and 4D indices of vascularity. 4D vs. 3D indices were compared with different machine settings, across the cardiac cycle and in the different placenta regions to assess regional variability.

Results

3D and 4D indices significantly decreased as wall motion filter (WMF) was increased (P < 0.001). Repeatability decreased as WMF increased (ICC; low1 = 0.80; high1 = 0.60). Indices were significantly lower at the maternal aspect (P = 0.002–0.009) of the placenta and showed less repeatability (ICC; 0.42–0.79) than the fetal aspect (ICC 0.49–0.88). 4D repeatability was good in the central region (ICC 0.80–0.81) but poor in the periphery (ICC 0.45–0.59), while 3D indices were good and comparable between regions (ICC; 0.80 central; 0.81 peripheral).

Conclusions

This study supports the future use of WMF ‘low1’ and PD to generate more reliable 4D indices values. For 3D indices, HD Flow may improve Doppler signal sensitivity. Regarding placental regional variability, the fetal plate and the central region demonstrated more repeatable 4D indices. 4D PD indices have potential to overcome the limitations of VOCAL™ indices and provide an internally standardised measure of localised impedance in vascular beds.

SUBMITTER: Wu L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8409850 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:A primary goal of modern cheese manufacturing is consistent product quality. One aspect of product quality that remains poorly understood is the variability of microbial subpopulations due to temporal or facility changes within cheese production environments. Therefore, our aim was to quantify this variability by measuring day-day and facility-facility changes in the cheese facility microbiome. In-process product (i.e., milk and cheese) and food-contact surfaces were sampled over the course of three production days at three cheese manufacturing facilities. Microbial communities were characterized using 16S rRNA metabarcoding and by plating on selective growth media. Each facility produced near-identical Cheddar cheese recipes on near-identical processing equipment during the time of sampling. Each facility also used a common pool of Lactococcus starter cultures which were rotated daily as groups of 4-5 strains and selected independently at each facility. Diversity analysis revealed significant facility-facility and day-day differences at each sample location. Facility differences were greatest on the food contact surfaces (i.e., draining-matting conveyor belts), explaining between 25 and 41% of the variance. Conversely, daily differences within each facility explained a greater proportion of the variance in the milk (20% vs. 12%) and cheese (29% vs. 20%). Further investigation into the sources of these differences revealed the involvement of several industrially relevant bacteria, including lactobacilli, which play a central role in flavor and texture development during Cheddar cheese ripening. Additionally, Streptococcus was found to contribute notably to differences observed in milk samples, whereas Acinetobacter, Streptococcus, Lactococcus, Exiguobacterium, and Enterobacteriaceae contributed notably to differences on the food contact surfaces. Facility differences in the cheese were overwhelmingly attributed to the rotation of Lactococcus starter cultures, thus highlighting circumstances where daily microbial shifts could be misinterpreted and emphasizing the importance of repeated sampling over time. The outcomes of this work highlight the complexity of the cheese facility microbiome and demonstrate daily and facility-facility microbial variations which might impact cheese product quality.