Dataset Information

Frequentist rules for regulatory approval of subgroups in phase III trials: A fresh look at an old problem.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The number of Phase III trials that include a biomarker in design and analysis has increased due to interest in personalised medicine. For genetic mutations and other predictive biomarkers, the trial sample comprises two subgroups, one of which, say B+ is known or suspected to achieve a larger treatment effect than the other B-. Despite treatment effect heterogeneity, trials often draw patients from both subgroups, since the lower responding B- subgroup may also gain benefit from the intervention. In this case, regulators/commissioners must decide what constitutes sufficient evidence to approve the drug in the B- population.

Methods and results

Assuming trial analysis can be completed using generalised linear models, we define and evaluate three frequentist decision rules for approval. For rule one, the significance of the average treatment effect in B- should exceed a pre-defined minimum value, say ZB->L. For rule two, the data from the low-responding group B- should increase statistical significance. For rule three, the subgroup-treatment interaction should be non-significant, using type I error chosen to ensure that estimated difference between the two subgroup effects is acceptable. Rules are evaluated based on conditional power, given that there is an overall significant treatment effect. We show how different rules perform according to the distribution of patients across the two subgroups and when analyses include additional (stratification) covariates in the analysis, thereby conferring correlation between subgroup effects.

Conclusions

When additional conditions are required for approval of a new treatment in a lower response subgroup, easily applied rules based on minimum effect sizes and relaxed interaction tests are available. Choice of rule is influenced by the proportion of patients sampled from the two subgroups but less so by the correlation between subgroup effects.

SUBMITTER: Edgar K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8411475 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Mechanical stress from haemodynamic perturbations or interventional manipulation of epicardial coronary atherosclerotic plaques with inflammatory destabilization can release particulate debris, thrombotic material and soluble substances into the coronary circulation. The physical material obstructs the coronary microcirculation, whereas the soluble substances induce endothelial dysfunction and facilitate vasoconstriction. Coronary microvascular obstruction and dysfunction result in patchy microinfarcts accompanied by an inflammatory reaction, both of which contribute to progressive myocardial contractile dysfunction. In clinical studies, the benefit of protection devices to retrieve atherothrombotic debris during percutaneous coronary interventions has been modest, and the treatment of microembolization has mostly relied on antiplatelet and vasodilator agents. The past 25 years have witnessed a relative proportional increase in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the presentation of acute coronary syndromes. An associated increase in the incidence of plaque erosion rather than rupture has also been recognized as a key mechanism in the past decade. We propose that coronary microembolization is a decisive link between plaque erosion at the culprit lesion and the manifestation of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. In this Review, we characterize the features and mechanisms of coronary microembolization and discuss the clinical trials of drugs and devices for prevention and treatment. In this Review, Kleinbongard and Heusch characterize the features and mechanisms of coronary microembolization and discuss the clinical trials of drugs and devices for the prevention and treatment of this phenomenon. Key points Coronary microembolization results from spontaneous or interventional erosion or rupture of an epicardial coronary atherosclerotic plaque. Atherothrombotic plaque debris causes physical obstruction of coronary microvessels and results in microinfarcts with an inflammatory response. The surviving myocardium around the patchy microinfarcts has reduced contractile function as a result of inflammatory signal transduction leading to myofibrillar oxidation. Atherosclerotic plaque erosion or rupture releases soluble substances that induce coronary microvascular endothelial dysfunction, vasoconstriction, platelet aggregation and coagulation. Routine use of interventional protection devices does not improve patient outcomes but these devices are indicated in cases of high atherothrombotic plaque burden. Plaque stabilization with statins and canakinumab prevents coronary microembolization, whereas platelet inhibitors, vasodilators and interleukin antagonists attenuate coronary microvascular impairment.