Dataset Information

Evaluation of sTREM1 and suPAR Biomarkers as Diagnostic and Prognostic Predictors in Sepsis Patients.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The purpose of this study was to explore the diagnostic role of sTREM1 in the diagnosis of sepsis and in differentiating between sepsis and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). We also aimed to assess the prognostic value of suPAR in comparison to sequential organ-failure assessment (SOFA), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II scores, and 28-day mortality.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study conducted in the Medical Microbiology and Immunology Department and Central Research Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University from June 2019 to January 2021. The study population was classified into two groups: SIRS (no evidence of infection) and sepsis (with SIRS and evidence of infection). Patients were rated on the SOFA and APACHE II scoring systems at admission and after 7 days. Serum levels of sTREM1 and suPAR were measured by ELISA at the same time points.

Results

CRP and sTREM1 values were significantly higher in the sepsis group than the SIRS group on both days (P<0.0001). The area under the curve (AUC) for CRP was 0.87 on the first day and 0.97 on the seventh, while the AUC for sTREM1 was 1.00 and 0.93 on the first and seventh days, respectively. The sensitivity of sTREM1 was 100% and specificity 84% at a cutoff of 49 pg/mL. There was a significantly positive correlation between CRP and sTREM1 values (P<0.0001). On the seventh day, nonsurvivors had significantly higher serum levels of suPAR (median 4.9 ng/mL) than survivors (median 2.9 ng/mL; P<0.0001). Nonsurvivors also had significantly higher SOFA and APACHE II scores than survivors (P<0.0001 and P<0.0001, respectively).

Conclusion

sTREM1 can be used as a good indicator for diagnosing sepsis in intensive care-unit patients. suPAR can also be used as a predictor of bad prognosis and poor survival at 7 days following admission.

SUBMITTER: Nasr El-Din A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8418360 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundNeonatal septicemia is a critical medical situation; current conventional laboratory methods still have many limitations and diagnostic obstacles. For this purpose, last decades have witnessed a challenge between the battery of sepsis biomarkers including many leukocyte surface antigens, not only for early diagnostic purposes but also for better follow-up and good management of sepsis patients.AimTo evaluate the diagnostic, prognostic, and monitoring performance of both neutrophil CD64 (nCD64) and presepsin as sepsis biomarkers compared to each other and to the conventional laboratory sepsis parameters aiming to decide which is the best fitting for routine daily use in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).Methods235 neonates were enrolled from three Egyptian neonatal ICUs, during the period from November 2015 till March 2018; they were classified into two main groups: the control group (n = 102) and the sepsis group (n = 133). Laboratory sepsis evaluation included highly sensitive CRP (hs-CRP), CBC, in addition to nCD64 (flow cytometry technique), and presepsin measurement (CLEIA technique combined with Magtration® technology); the diagnosis was confirmed thereafter by positive blood culture results (BacT/Alert system). Sixty-two of the enrolled sepsis neonates were subjected to follow-up assessment; they were reclassified according to their clinical improvement at the second time assessment into (group 1: sepsis group without improvement) (n = 20) and (group 2: improved sepsis group) (n = 42).ResultsSignificant increase in nCD64 and presepsin values was found in sepsis groups compared to the controls. At cutoff 41.6%, nCD64% could discriminate the presence of septicemia with sensitivity 94.7%, specificity 93.6 %, and AUC 0.925, while presepsin at cutoff 686 pg/ml achieves sensitivity 82.7%, specificity 95.5%, and AUC 0.887, respectively. Significant increase in nCD64 (P < 0.001) and hs-CRP (P=0.018) values was observed in severe sepsis/septic shock patients compared to nonsevere sepsis patients. Delta change percentage (dC%) between initial and follow-up evaluations for both improved and nonimproved sepsis patients was dC Z value -5.904 for nCD64% followed by dC Z value -4.494 for presepsin.ConclusionnCD64 and presepsin are valuable early diagnostic and monitoring sepsis biomarkers; the highest sensitivity could be achieved by a univariant sepsis marker in this study was recorded by the nCD64% biomarker, while the highest specificity was documented by presepsin. Combined measurement of both achieves the highest diagnostic performance in sepsis neonates. Either of CD64 or presepsin combined with hs-CRP associated with better performance than any of them alone. nCD64 carries an additional promising role in reflecting sepsis prognosis.

Project description:Neuroblastoma (NB) is the most common extracranial solid tumor during infancy, causing up to 10% of mortality in children. NB shows notable heterogeneity with regard to histology and clinical behavior, ranging from low-risk localized tumors (LR-NB) to high-risk disease (HR-NB), characterized by aggressive metastatic phenotype, resistance to treatment, and fatal relapse occurrence. Risk stratification demands high accuracy, as it will determine the therapeutic treatment. However, the current therapeutic stratification, based on clinical and molecular risk factors, does not allow to discriminate among patients with similar clinical-pathological parameters who receive the same treatment despite showing markedly different clinical courses. The need of novel diagnostic molecular tools in oncology has led to increasing interest in liquid biopsies as a source of biomarkers, as they provide a minimally invasive method. Body fluids are a source of exosomes, nanosized extracellular vesicles that can drive tumor growth and chemoresistance. We previously identified exosomal microRNAs (exo-miRNA) indicative of HR-NB patient sensitivity/resistance to chemotherapy. As exosomes from cancer patients carry proteins that reflect the surface and cytoplasm content of parental cancer cells, including immunosuppressive molecules known to be associated with cancer progression and/or response to therapy, we extended our study to the exosomal proteins (Exo-prot).The purpose of the study is to identify Exo-prot that (i) are specifically expressed in NB patients and (ii) are associated with tumor phenotype and disease stage, in order to improve risk stratification and refine diagnosis.We isolated exosomes from plasma specimens of 24 HR-NB patients and 24 LR-NB patients at diagnosis and of 24 age-matched healthy controls (CTRL). Exo-prot expression was measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Missing value distribution and differential expression analysis (performed with two different imputation methods) were applied to identify the most relevant Exo-prot. ROC analysis assessed the diagnostic value of the identified Exo-prot. We demonstrated that NB patients have a different Exo-prot expression profile compared to CTRL. The deregulated Exo-prot in NB specimens act mainly in tumor-associated pathways and build a strictly connected network. Furthermore, HR-NB patients show a different Exo-miR expression profile compared to LR-NB subjects, with the modulation of molecules involved in cell migration, proliferation and metastasis. Importantly, we show that NCAM, NCL, LUM and VASP have a diagnostic value in discriminating NB patients from CTRL; while MYH9, FN1, CALR, AKAP12 and, with a lower performance, LTBP1 can differentiate HR-NB and LR-NB patients with high accuracy. We demonstrated that Exo-prot deregulated in NB vs CTRL subjects and in HR-NB vs LR-NB patients contribute to NB tumor development and to the aggressive metastatic NB phenotype, respectively. We identified Exo-prot with significant diagnostic value for NB patients and able to efficiently identify the HR-NB subset of patients, which can be employed to improve risk stratification. Our results highlight the applicability of Exo-prot evaluation for integrating NB diagnosis and risk assessment.

Project description:Background Neonatal sepsis (NS) is a very critical medical situation associated with high morbidities and mortalities. There is an utmost need for a new tool helping in early diagnosis and proper management of sepsis neonates. Neutrophil CD64 (nCD64) shows a very promising value in this concerning issue. Aim Evaluate the diagnostic, monitoring, and prognostic performances of nCD64 and highly sensitive CRP (hs-CRP) in NS as well as the possible best panel of biomarkers that can achieve the most desirable results. Methods Patients were enrolled from three neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) (n = 121 patients) and classified according to their initial sepsis evaluation into three groups: disease control group (n = 30), proven sepsis group (n = 17), and clinical sepsis group (n = 74). Laboratory evaluation included hs-CRP, complete blood count (CBC), and blood culture in addition to nCD64 (done by flow cytometry technique). Besides the diagnostic evaluations, follow-up evaluations were done for 40 patients after five days from the first time; patients were reclassified according to their outcome into the improved sepsis neonates' group (n = 26) and sepsis neonates without improvement (n = 14). Results Significant increase in nCD64 and hs-CRP results were present in sepsis groups compared to the disease controls (P < 0.001); nCD64 at 43% cutoff value could detect the presence of sepsis with 85.6% sensitivity and 93% specificity. Additionally, delta change percentage (dC%) between improved sepsis neonates and sepsis neonates without improvement showed a significant difference in the levels of both nCD64 (P < 0.001) and hs-CRP (P = 0.001). Conclusion Besides the promising diagnostic performance documented by nCD64 which is higher than the other laboratory sepsis biomarkers used routinely in NICUs, nCD64 has a valuable role in sepsis patients' monitoring and prognostic evaluation. hs-CRP was moderate in its diagnostic and monitoring results being less than that achieved by nCD64. Combined measurement of nCD64% and hs-CRP gives better diagnostic and monitoring performance than that achieved by any of them alone.

Project description:In 2007, the nosology for HIV-1-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) was updated to a primarily neurocognitive disorder. However, currently available diagnostic tools lack the sensitivity and specificity needed for an accurate diagnosis for HAND. Scientists and clinicians, therefore, have been on a quest for an innovative biomarker to diagnose (i.e., diagnostic biomarker) and/or predict (i.e., prognostic biomarker) the progression of HAND in the post-combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) era. The present review examined the utility and challenges of four proposed biomarkers, including neurofilament light (NFL) chain concentration, amyloid (i.e., sAPP?, sAPP?, amyloid ?) and tau proteins (i.e., total tau, phosphorylated tau), resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and prepulse inhibition (PPI). Although significant genotypic differences have been observed in NFL chain concentration, sAPP?, sAPP?, amyloid ?, total tau, phosphorylated tau, and resting-state fMRI, inconsistencies and/or assessment limitations (e.g., invasive procedures, lack of disease specificity, cost) challenge their utility as a diagnostic and/or prognostic biomarker for milder forms of neurocognitive impairment (NCI) in the post-cART era. However, critical evaluation of the literature supports the utility of PPI as a powerful diagnostic biomarker with high accuracy (i.e., 86.7-97.1%), sensitivity (i.e., 89.3-100%), and specificity (i.e., 79.5-94.1%). Additionally, the inclusion of multiple CSF and/or plasma markers, rather than a single protein, may provide a more sensitive diagnostic biomarker for HAND; however, a pressing need for additional research remains. Most notably, PPI may serve as a prognostic biomarker for milder forms of NCI, evidenced by its ability to predict later NCI in higher-order cognitive domains with regression coefficients (i.e., r) greater than 0.8. Thus, PPI heralds an opportunity for the development of a brief, noninvasive diagnostic and promising prognostic biomarker for milder forms of NCI in the post-cART era.

Project description:Introduction: The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) related to vancomycin is variable, and several risk factors related to the treatment and patients may explain the nephrotoxicity. The role of urinary biomarkers in AKI related to vancomycin is unknown. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of urinary IL-18, KIM-1, NGAL, TIMP-2, and IGFBP7 as diagnostic and prognostic predictors of AKI related to vancomycin. Methods: A prospective cohort study of patients receiving vancomycin and admitted to wards of a public university hospital from July 2019 to May 2020 was performed. We excluded patients that had AKI before starting vancomycin, hemodynamic instability, inability to collect urine, and chronic kidney disease stage 5. Results: Ninety-four patients were included, and the prevalence of AKI was 24.5%, while the general mortality was 8.7%. AKI occurred 11 ± 2 days after the first vancomycin dose. The most frequent KDIGO stage was 1 (61%). There was no difference between patients who developed and did not develop AKI due to gender, length of hospital stay, dose, and time of vancomycin use. Logistic regression identified age (OR 6.6, CI 1.16-38.22, p = 0.03), plasmatic vancomycin concentrations between 96 and 144 h (OR 1.18, CI 1.04-1.40, p = 0.04), and urinary NGAL levels between 96 and 144 h (OR 1.123, CI 1.096-1.290, p = 0.03) as predictors of AKI. The time of vancomycin use (OR 4.61, CI 1.11-22.02, p = 0.03), higher plasmatic vancomycin concentrations between 192 and 240 h (OR 1.02, CI 0.98-1.06, p = 0.26), and higher cell cycle arrest urinary biomarkers TIMP-2 multiplied by IGFBP-7 between 144 and 192 h (OR 1.33, CI 1.10-1.62, p = 0.02; OR 1.19, CI 1.09-1.39, p = 0.04, respectively) were identified as prognostic factors for non-recovery of kidney function at discharge. Conclusion: AKI related to vancomycin was frequent in patients hospitalized in wards. Age, plasmatic vancomycin concentrations, and NGAL between 96 and 144 h were identified as predictors of AKI related to vancomycin use. Plasmatic vancomycin concentrations and urinary NGAL were predictors of AKI diagnosis within the next 5 days. The urinary biomarkers of cell cycle arrest TIMP-2 and IGFBP-7 and the duration of vancomycin use were associated with non-recovery of kidney function at hospital discharge moment.

Project description:ObjectivesRapid fluid resuscitation has become standard in sepsis care, despite "low-quality" evidence and absence of guidelines for populations "at risk" for volume overload. Our objectives include as follows: 1) identify predictors of reaching a 30 mL/kg crystalloid bolus within 3 hours of sepsis onset (30by3); 2) assess the impact of 30by3 and fluid dosing on clinical outcomes; 3) examine differences in perceived "at-risk" volume-sensitive populations, including end-stage renal disease, heart failure, obesity, advanced age, or with documentation of volume "overload" by bedside examination.DesignRetrospective cohort study. All outcome analyses controlled for sex, end-stage renal disease, heart failure, sepsis severity (severe sepsis vs septic shock), obesity, Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis score, and time to antibiotics.SettingUrban, tertiary care center between January 1, 2014, and May 31, 2017.PatientsEmergency Department treated adults (age ≥18 yr; n = 1,032) with severe sepsis or septic shock.InterventionsAdministration of IV fluids by bolus.Measurements and main resultsIn total, 509 patients received 30by3 (49.3%). Overall mortality was 17.1% (n = 176), with 20.4% mortality in the shock group. Patients who were elderly (odds ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.46-0.83), male (odds ratio, 0.66; CI, 0.49-0.87), obese (odds ratio, 0.18; CI, 0.13-0.25), or with end-stage renal disease (odds ratio, 0.23; CI, 0.13-0.40), heart failure (odds ratio, 0.42; CI, 0.29-0.60), or documented volume "overload" (odds ratio, 0.30; CI, 0.20-0.45) were less likely to achieve 30by3. Failure to meet 30by3 had increased odds of mortality (odds ratio, 1.52; CI, 1.03-2.24), delayed hypotension (odds ratio, 1.42; CI, 1.02-1.99), and increased ICU stay (~2 d) (β = 2.0; CI, 0.5-3.6), without differential effects for "at-risk" groups. Higher fluid volumes administered by 3 hours correlated with decreased mortality, with a plateau effect between 35 and 45 mL/kg (p < 0.05).ConclusionsFailure to reach 30by3 was associated with increased odds of in-hospital mortality, irrespective of comorbidities. Predictors of inadequate resuscitation can be identified, potentially leading to interventions to improve survival. These findings are retrospective and require future validation.