Dataset Information

Intravenous Compatibility of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Aztreonam Using Simulated and Actual Y-site Administration.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

The objective of this communication was to determine the intravenous compatibility of ceftazidime/avibactam and aztreonam using simulated and actual Y-site administration.

Methods

Ceftazidime-avibactam was reconstituted and diluted to concentrations of 8, 25, and 50 mg/mL in 0.9% sodium chloride. Aztreonam was reconstituted and diluted to concentrations of 10 and 20 mg/mL. Each combination of concentrations was tested for compatibility using visual, Tyndall beam, microscopy, turbidity, and pH assessments. Microscopy results were compared to those from sodium chloride 0.9% in water, pH was compared to that at time 0, and turbidity of combinations was compared to that of individual agents. Actual Y-site mixing was conducted over 2-h infusions with samples collected at 0, 1, and 2 h. Test results were evaluated at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 h after mixing. All experiments were completed in triplicate.

Findings

Across simulated and actual Y-site experiments, no evidence of incompatibility between combinations of ceftazidime-avibactam + aztreonam was observed. Visual and microscopic tests revealed no particulate matter, color changes, or turbidity. Tyndall beam tests were negative with all combinations. No evidence of incompatibility was observed in turbidity testing. The pH values were consistent across each of the 6 combinations, from immediately after mixing until 12 h after mixing. When the addition of agents was reversed in simulated Y-site experiments, no differences in compatibility were observed. No differences in compatibility between actual and simulated Y-site administration were observed, and there was minimal variability across all replicate experiments.

Implications

Ceftazidime-avibactam, at concentrations of 8, 25, and 50 mg/mL, appeared compatible with aztreonam at concentrations of 10 and 20 mg/mL.

SUBMITTER: O'Donnell JN

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8428177 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundMBL-producing strains of Enterobacteriaceae are a major public health concern. We sought to define optimal combination regimens of ceftazidime/avibactam with aztreonam in a hollow-fibre infection model (HFIM) of MBL-producing strains of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae.MethodsE. coli ARLG-1013 (blaNDM-1, blaCTX-M, blaCMY, blaTEM) and K. pneumoniae ARLG-1002 (blaNDM-1, blaCTXM-15, blaDHA, blaSHV, blaTEM) were studied in the HFIM using simulated human dosing regimens of ceftazidime/avibactam and aztreonam. Experiments were designed to evaluate the effect of staggered versus simultaneous administration, infusion duration and aztreonam daily dose (6 g/day versus 8 g/day) on bacterial killing and resistance suppression. Prospective validation experiments for the most active combination regimens were performed in triplicate to ensure reproducibility.ResultsStaggered administration of the combination (ceftazidime/avibactam followed by aztreonam) was found to be inferior to simultaneous administration. Longer infusion durations (2 h and continuous infusion) also resulted in enhanced bacterial killing relative to 30 min infusions. The rate of killing was more pronounced with 8 g/day versus 6 g/day aztreonam combination regimens for both tested strains. In the prospective validation experiments, ceftazidime/avibactam with aztreonam dosed every 8 and 6 h, respectively (ceftazidime/avibactam 2/0.5 g every 8 h + aztreonam 2 g every 6 h), or ceftazidime/avibactam with aztreonam as continuous infusions resulted in maximal bacterial killing and resistance suppression over 7 days.ConclusionsSimultaneous administration of aztreonam 8 g/day given as a continuous or 2 h infusion with ceftazidime/avibactam resulted in complete bacterial eradication and resistance suppression. Further study of this combination is needed with additional MBL-producing Gram-negative pathogens. The safety of this double β-lactam strategy also warrants further study in Phase 1 clinical trials.