Dataset Information

Appropriate PD-L1 Cutoff Value for Gastric Cancer Immunotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Immunotherapy dramatically changed the treatment landscape of gastric cancer in recent years. PD-L1 expression was proposed as a biomarker; however, the treatment strategy according to PD-L1 is still uncertain. Here, we aimed to find the appropriate cutoff value of PD-L1 expression for gastric cancer immunotherapy.

Methods

We did a systematic electronic research of prospective clinical trials of gastric cancer immunotherapy across databases. Studies that provided subgroup analysis results stratified by PD-L1 expression were included. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), hazard ratio (HR), and 95% confidential interval (CI) of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at different PD-L1 cutoff values were extracted.

Results

Twelve studies and 6,488 patients in total were finally included for pooled analysis. ORR in allover, PD-L1-negative, combined positive score (CPS) ≥1, CPS ≥5, and CPS ≥10 population was 10%, 3%, 13%, 20%, and 23%, respectively. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy failed to show survival advantage in allover and PD-L1-negative patients. Single-agent ICI therapy prolonged OS (HR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.74-0.96) but not PFS (HR = 1.38, 95% CI: 0.91-2.09) in PD-L1 CPS ≥1 patients. For combined immunotherapy, ORR in allover, PD-L1-negative, CPS ≥1, CPS ≥5, and CPS ≥10 population was 64%, 57%, 48%, 60%, and 58%, respectively. Allover population could gain survival benefit from combined immunotherapy based on the results from Checkmate-649. OS (HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.71-0.92) and PFS (HR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.69-0.86) were significantly prolonged in PD-L1 CPS ≥1 patients receiving combined immunotherapy.

Conclusion

Efficacy and survival advantages improved with PD-L1 CPS. CPS ≥1 was the cutoff value for ICI monotherapy to gain survival benefit. Combined immunotherapy prolonged PFS and OS in allover population but needs further study to confirm it.

SUBMITTER: Xie T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8440909 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Immunotherapy-based regiments have potential as first-line treatment for advanced gastric esophageal cancer. The present study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis of the association between the efficacy and safety of first-line immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic gastric esophageal cancer. Subgroup analysis of patients with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) was conducted to identify the characteristics of patients with immune benefit and to provide a decision-making basis for clinical practice. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and other databases were searched to collect randomized controlled trials of immunotreatment-based regimens (experimental group) versus conventional first-line chemotherapy regimens (control group) for unresectable locally advanced or metastatic gastric esophageal cancer. The main outcome measures included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate, disease control rate and safety, and the secondary outcomes were the differences in OS and PFS between patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 and those with PD-L1 CPS <10. In addition, Asian and non-Asian populations were analysed. Nine studies with a total of 6,820 patients were included. The OS of patients treated with immunotherapy-based regimens was significantly longer than that of those treated with chemotherapy alone [HR=0.74; 95% CI (0.69, 0.80); P<0.00001]. The OS of patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 and PD-L1 CPS <10 in the experimental group was significantly longer than that of patients in the control group [HR=0.68; 95% CI (0.59, 0.77); P<0.00001 and HR=0.73; 95% CI (0.62, 0.87); P=0.0005]. The PFS of patients being treated with immunotherapy-based regimens was significantly longer than that of those treated with chemotherapy alone [HR=0.71; 95% CI (0.59, 0.86); P=0.0003]. In addition, the PFS of patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 and PD-L1 CPS <10 in the experimental group was significantly longer than that of patients in the control group [HR=0.67; 95% CI (0.49, 0.92); P=0.01 and HR=0.63; 95% CI (0.48, 0.83); P=0.001]. There was no significant difference in the overall incidence of adverse events and the incidence of grade 3 or above adverse events between the experimental and control groups [RR=1; 95% CI (0.99, 1.02); P=0.65 and RR=0.97; 95% CI (0.84, 1.12); P=0.69, respectively]. In conclusion, treatment with immunotherapy-based regimens may prolong the OS of patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic gastric esophageal cancer and this treatment regimen is safe compared with chemotherapy alone.

Project description:BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown promising prospects in locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC) immunotherapy, but their efficacy in neoadjuvant settings remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of integrating programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors into neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) of GC/GEJC treatment.MethodsPubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and main oncology conference databases were systematically searched up to 19 November 2022, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus NACT were included. The main outcomes were pathological complete response (pCR), major pathological response (MPR), R0 resection rate, and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).ResultsA total of 753 patients from 20 prospective studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled pCR and MPR rates from studies reporting were 21.7% [95% confidence interval (CI), 18.1%-25.5%] and 44.0% (95% CI, 34.1%-53.8%), respectively. The pooled incidence rate of total TRAEs was 89.1% (95% CI, 82.7%-94.3%), and the incidence rate of grade 3 to 4 TRAEs was 34.4% (95% CI, 17.8%-66.5%). The pooled R0 resection rate was reported to be 98.9% (95% CI, 97.0%-99.9%). Subgroup analysis has not found significant differences in efficacy and safety among different PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Moreover, the efficacy in patients with positive PD-L1 expression (combined positive score ≥1) was comparable with that in the entire study population [pCR, 22.5% vs. 21.2% (p > 0.05); MPR, 48.6% vs. 43.7% (p > 0.05)].ConclusionThis systematic review and meta-analysis found that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with NACT for locally advanced GC/GEJC were well tolerated and may confer therapeutic advantages. The integration of ICIs into NACT has shown the potential for application in any PD-L1 expression population.