Dataset Information

On cross-ancestry cancer polygenic risk scores.

ABSTRACT: Polygenic risk scores (PRS) can provide useful information for personalized risk stratification and disease risk assessment, especially when combined with non-genetic risk factors. However, their construction depends on the availability of summary statistics from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) independent from the target sample. For best compatibility, it was reported that GWAS and the target sample should match in terms of ancestries. Yet, GWAS, especially in the field of cancer, often lack diversity and are predominated by European ancestry. This bias is a limiting factor in PRS research. By using electronic health records and genetic data from the UK Biobank, we contrast the utility of breast and prostate cancer PRS derived from external European-ancestry-based GWAS across African, East Asian, European, and South Asian ancestry groups. We highlight differences in the PRS distributions of these groups that are amplified when PRS methods condense hundreds of thousands of variants into a single score. While European-GWAS-derived PRS were not directly transferrable across ancestries on an absolute scale, we establish their predictive potential when considering them separately within each group. For example, the top 10% of the breast cancer PRS distributions within each ancestry group each revealed significant enrichments of breast cancer cases compared to the bottom 90% (odds ratio of 2.81 [95%CI: 2.69,2.93] in European, 2.88 [1.85, 4.48] in African, 2.60 [1.25, 5.40] in East Asian, and 2.33 [1.55, 3.51] in South Asian individuals). Our findings highlight a compromise solution for PRS research to compensate for the lack of diversity in well-powered European GWAS efforts while recruitment of diverse participants in the field catches up.

SUBMITTER: Fritsche LG

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8445431 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceMultiple polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for breast cancer have been developed from large research consortia; however, their generalizability to diverse clinical settings is unknown.ObjectiveTo examine the performance of previously developed breast cancer PRSs in a clinical setting for women of European, African, and Latinx ancestry.Design, setting, and participantsThis cohort study using the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) network data set included 39 591 women from 9 contributing medical centers in the US that had electronic medical records (EMR) linked to genotype data. Breast cancer cases and controls were identified through a validated EMR phenotyping algorithm.Main outcomes and measuresMultivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between breast cancer risk and 7 previously developed PRSs, adjusting for age, study site, breast cancer family history, and first 3 ancestry informative principal components.ResultsThis study included 39 591 women: 33 594 with European, 3801 with African, and 2196 with Latinx ancestry. The mean (SD) age at breast cancer diagnosis was 60.7 (13.0), 58.8 (12.5), and 60.1 (13.0) years for women with European, African, and Latinx ancestry, respectively. PRSs derived from women with European ancestry were associated with breast cancer risk in women with European ancestry (highest odds ratio [OR] per 1-SD increase, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.41-1.51), women with Latinx ancestry (highest OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.09-1.58), and women with African ancestry (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.05-1.35). For women with European ancestry, this association with breast cancer risk was largest in the extremes of the PRS distribution, with ORs ranging from 2.19 (95% CI, 1.84-2.53) to 2.48 (95% CI, 1.89-3.25) for the 3 different PRSs examined for those in the highest 1% of the PRS compared with those in the middle quantile. Among women with Latinx and African ancestries at the extremes of the PRS distribution, there were no statistically significant associations.Conclusions and relevanceThis cohort study found that PRS models derived from women with European ancestry for breast cancer risk generalized well for women with European, Latinx, and African ancestries across different clinical settings, although the effect sizes for women with African ancestry were smaller, likely because of differences in risk allele frequencies and linkage disequilibrium patterns. These results highlight the need to improve representation of diverse population groups, particularly women with African ancestry, in genomic research cohorts.

Project description:Polygenic risk scores (PRS) have predominantly been derived from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) conducted in European ancestry (EUR) individuals. In this study, we present an in-depth evaluation of PRS based on multi-ancestry GWAS for five cardiometabolic phenotypes in the Penn Medicine BioBank (PMBB) followed by a phenome-wide association study (PheWAS). We examine the PRS performance across all individuals and separately in African ancestry (AFR) and EUR ancestry groups. For AFR individuals, PRS derived using the multi-ancestry LD panel showed a higher effect size for four out of five PRSs (DBP, SBP, T2D, and BMI) than those derived from the AFR LD panel. In contrast, for EUR individuals, the multi-ancestry LD panel PRS demonstrated a higher effect size for two out of five PRSs (SBP and T2D) compared to the EUR LD panel. These findings underscore the potential benefits of utilizing a multi-ancestry LD panel for PRS derivation in diverse genetic backgrounds and demonstrate overall robustness in all individuals. Our results also revealed significant associations between PRS and various phenotypic categories. For instance, CAD PRS was linked with 18 phenotypes in AFR and 82 in EUR, while T2D PRS correlated with 84 phenotypes in AFR and 78 in EUR. Notably, associations like hyperlipidemia, renal failure, atrial fibrillation, coronary atherosclerosis, obesity, and hypertension were observed across different PRSs in both AFR and EUR groups, with varying effect sizes and significance levels. However, in AFR individuals, the strength and number of PRS associations with other phenotypes were generally reduced compared to EUR individuals. Our study underscores the need for future research to prioritize 1) conducting GWAS in diverse ancestry groups and 2) creating a cosmopolitan PRS methodology that is universally applicable across all genetic backgrounds. Such advances will foster a more equitable and personalized approach to precision medicine.

Dataset Information

On cross-ancestry cancer polygenic risk scores.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets