Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Clinical evaluation of the Procleix SARS-CoV-2 assay, a sensitive, high-throughput test that runs on an automated system.


ABSTRACT: Testing is crucial in controlling COVID-19. The Procleix® SARS-CoV-2 assay, a transcription-mediated amplification nucleic acid test that runs on an automated system, was evaluated using inactivated virus and clinical samples. The sensitivity of the assay was assessed using heat-inactivated SARS-CoV-2 and compared to 3 other tests. Clinical validation utilized 2 sets of samples: (1) Nasal, nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal samples (n = 963) from asymptomatic individuals, and (2) nasopharyngeal samples from symptomatic patients: 100 positive and 100 negative by RT-PCR. The Procleix assay had greater sensitivity (3-fold to 100-fold) than the comparators and had high specificity (100%) in asymptomatic subjects. In symptomatic patients, the Procleix assay detected 100% of PCR-positives and found 24 positives in the initial PCR-negatives. Eighteen of these were confirmed positive and 6 were inconclusive. These studies showed that the Procleix SARS-CoV-2 assay was a sensitive and specific tool for detecting COVID-19.

SUBMITTER: Sauleda S 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8464401 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Clinical evaluation of the Procleix SARS-CoV-2 assay, a sensitive, high-throughput test that runs on an automated system.

Sauleda Silvia S   Palacios Lourdes L   Brès Vanessa V   Piñana Maria M   Alonso-Hernandez Lorena L   Bes Marta M   Piron Maria M   Entrena Edurne E   Minguez-Micolau Antonio M AM   Marimón Jose Maria JM   Gurrola Adrian A   Soria Gloria G   Puig Lluís L   Antón Andrés A   Pumarola Tomás T   Linnen Jeffrey M JM  

Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease 20210925 1


Testing is crucial in controlling COVID-19. The Procleix® SARS-CoV-2 assay, a transcription-mediated amplification nucleic acid test that runs on an automated system, was evaluated using inactivated virus and clinical samples. The sensitivity of the assay was assessed using heat-inactivated SARS-CoV-2 and compared to 3 other tests. Clinical validation utilized 2 sets of samples: (1) Nasal, nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal samples (n = 963) from asymptomatic individuals, and (2) nasopharyngeal sa  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8906008 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8722588 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7441286 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10715159 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8284070 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8351226 | biostudies-literature
2022-02-23 | GSE176224 | GEO
| S-EPMC7836538 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7512162 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7592518 | biostudies-literature