Project description:BackgroundGermline variants affecting the proofreading activity of polymerases epsilon and delta cause a hereditary cancer and adenomatous polyposis syndrome characterized by tumors with a high mutational burden and a specific mutational spectrum. In addition to the implementation of multiple pieces of evidence for the classification of gene variants, POLE and POLD1 variant classification is particularly challenging given that non-disruptive variants affecting the proofreading activity of the corresponding polymerase are the ones associated with cancer. In response to an evident need in the field, we have developed gene-specific variant classification recommendations, based on the ACMG/AMP (American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology) criteria, for the assessment of non-disruptive variants located in the sequence coding for the exonuclease domain of the polymerases.MethodsA training set of 23 variants considered pathogenic or benign was used to define the usability and strength of the ACMG/AMP criteria. Population frequencies, computational predictions, co-segregation data, phenotypic and tumor data, and functional results, among other features, were considered.ResultsGene-specific variant classification recommendations for non-disruptive variants located in the exonuclease domain of POLE and POLD1 were defined. The resulting recommendations were applied to 128 exonuclease domain variants reported in the literature and/or public databases. A total of 17 variants were classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic, and 17 as benign or likely benign.ConclusionsOur recommendations, with room for improvement in the coming years as more information become available on carrier families, tumor molecular characteristics and functional assays, are intended to serve the clinical and scientific communities and help improve diagnostic performance, avoiding variant misclassifications.
Project description:BackgroundGermline mutations affecting the exonuclease domains of POLE and POLD1 predispose to colorectal adenomas and carcinoma. Here, we aimed to screen the exonuclease domains to find the genetic causes of multiple colorectal polyps in unexplained cases.MethodsUsing a custom next-generation sequencing panel, we sequenced the exonuclease domains of POLE and POLD1 in 332 index patients diagnosed with multiple colorectal polyps without germline alteration in colorectal polyposis predisposing genes.ResultsWe identified two variants of unknown significance. One germline POLD1 c.961G>A, p.(Gly321Ser) variant was found in two cases. The first patient was diagnosed with multiple polyps at age 35 and colorectal cancer (CRC) at age 37, with no known family history of CRC. The second patient was diagnosed with CRC at age 44 and cumulatively developed multiple polyps; this patient had two sisters with endometrial cancer who did not carry the variant. Furthermore, we identified a novel POLD1 c.955 T>G, p.(Cys319Gly) variant in a patient diagnosed with multiple colorectal adenomas at age 40. Co-segregation analysis showed that one sister who cumulatively developed multiple adenomas from age 34, and another sister who developed CRC at age 38 did not carry the variant. We did not identify pathogenic variants in POLE and POLD1.ConclusionThis study confirms the low frequency of causal variants in these genes in the predisposition for multiple colorectal polyps, and also establishes that these genes are a rare cause of the disease.
Project description:BACKGROUND:Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality related to cancer. Only ~5% of all CRCs occur as a result of pathogenic variants in well-defined CRC predisposing genes. The frequency and effect of exonuclease domain pathogenic variants of POLE and POLD1 genes in Middle Eastern CRCs is still unknown. METHODS:Targeted capture sequencing and Sanger sequencing technologies were employed to investigate the germline exonuclease domain pathogenic variants of POLE and POLD1 in Middle Eastern CRCs. Immunohistochemical analysis of POLE and POLD1 was performed to look for associations between protein expression and clinico-pathological characteristics. RESULTS:Five damaging or possibly damaging variants (0.44%) were detected in 1,135 CRC cases, four in POLE gene (0.35%, 4/1,135) and one (0.1%, 1/1,135) in POLD1 gene. Furthermore, low POLE protein expression was identified in 38.9% (417/1071) cases and a significant association with lymph node involvement (p = .0184) and grade 3 tumors (p = .0139) was observed. Whereas, low POLD1 expression was observed in 51.9% (555/1069) of cases and was significantly associated with adenocarcinoma histology (p = .0164), larger tumor size (T3 and T4 tumors; p = .0012), and stage III tumors (p = .0341). CONCLUSION:POLE and POLD1 exonuclease domain pathogenic variants frequency in CRC cases was very low and these exonuclease domain pathogenic variants might be rare causative events of CRC in the Middle East. POLE and POLD1 can be included in multi-gene panels to screen CRC patients.
Project description:Inactivating mutations in the exonuclease domain of POLE induce somatic hypermutation resulting in a high tumor mutation burden (TMB) and are associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) benefit. POLE mutations outside the exonuclease domain predicted to be deleterious are also observed in cancers, but it is unknown whether they are similarly associated with response to ICIs. We present a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma with a rare POLE mutation (V1368M) outside the exonuclease-domain predicted to be deleterious, a low TMB (1 mut/Mb), and microsatellite stability, who demonstrated an exceptional response to pembrolizumab. To support the generalizability of this finding, an analysis of 1278 patients with advanced cancers harboring low or intermediate TMB treated with ICIs showed that missense non-exonuclease domain POLE mutations were associated with greater overall survival. In contrast, among patients with advanced cancers without ICI exposure, POLE mutations were not associated with overall survival. These results demonstrate that a subset of missense POLE mutations may represent predictive biomarkers independent of TMB. Pathogenic POLE mutations outside the exonuclease domain may result in altered functions beyond DNA replication and proofreading which render cancers sensitive to ICIs.
Project description:BackgroundMutations in POLE /POLD1 proofreading domain can cause deficiencies in DNA repair, conferring ultramutated cancer phenotypes. Preliminary clinical studies have revealed an association between POLE/POLD1 mutations and beneficial clinical outcomes to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy This study aims to investigate the genomic characteristics of POLE/POLD-mutant tumors and the prognostic value of POLE/POLD mutation for ICI treatment.MethodsGenomic data of 21,074 patients with 23 cancer types were retrieved from Burning Rock variant database (BR VarDB). The prevalence and spectra of POLE and POLD1 mutations were assessed and compared with that in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) samples. The correlations of POLE/POLD1 mutation with tumor mutational burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI) were investigated. The prognostic value of POLE/POLD1 mutations was also explored in 2,487 ICI-treated patients from published studies.ResultsBR VarDB samples displayed a similar mutational prevalence of POLE (3.2% vs. 3.2%) and POLD1 (1.4% vs. 1.6%, P=0.248) versusTCGA samples, but a slightly lower frequency of POLE and POLD1 co-mutations (0.21% vs. 0.43%, P<0.001). POLE/POLD1-mutant tumors harbored increased TCT→TAT and TCG→TTG transversions, and genomic signatures associated with DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency and ultra-hypermuation. Furthermore, tumors with POLE/POLD1 proofreading mutation showed a significantly higher TMB than tumors with non-proofreading mutations (P<0.01), although both possessed a higher TMB than POLE/POLD1 wild-type (WT) tumors (P<0.0001 and P<0.0001, respectively). MSI was commonly observed in tumors harboring dominant clone of POLE/POLD1 mutation (10.2%), but occurred rarely in POLE/POLD1 WT tumors (0.5%) and tumors with accumulating sub-cloned POLE/POLD1 mutation (0%). Survival analysis revealed that POLE/POLD1 mutation was not independently correlated with longer survival after adjusting for TMB and other factors (HR =0.86, P=0.372). However, patients harboring POLE/POLD1 mutation demonstrated a higher response rate than patients with POLE/ POLD1 WT tumors (35.2% vs. 19.6%, P=0.0165).ConclusionsWe delineated distinctive genomic characteristics in POLE/POLD1-mutant tumors, suggesting the potential predictive role of POLE/POLD1 mutations, especially those in the proofreading domain, for beneficial outcomes of immunotherapy. Our results also suggest that MSI caused by a loss-of-function mutation in the MMR pathway tends to result from POLE/POLD1 proofreading deficiency in POLE/POLD1-mutant tumors with MSI.
Project description:POLE driver mutations in the exonuclease domain (ExoD driver) are prevalent in several cancers, including colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer (EC), leading to dramatically ultra-high tumor mutation burden (TMB). To understand whether POLE mutations that are not classified as drivers (POLE Variant) contribute to mutagenesis, we assessed TMB in 447 POLE-mutated CRCs, ECs, and ovarian cancers (OC) classified as TMB-High ≥10 mut/Mb (TMB-H) or TMB-Low <10 mut/Mb (TMB-L). TMB was significantly highest in tumors with 'POLE ExoD driver plus POLE Variant' (CRC and EC, p<0.001; OC, p<0.05). TMB increased with additional POLE variants (p<0.001), but plateaued at 2, suggesting an association between the presence of these variants and TMB. Integrated analysis of AlphaFold2 POLE-models and quantitative stability estimates predicted the impact of multiple POLE variants on POLE functionality. The prevalence of immunogenic neoepitopes was notably higher in the 'POLE ExoD driver plus POLE Variant' tumors. Overall, this study reveals a novel correlation between POLE variants in POLE ExoD-driven tumors, and ultra-high TMB. Currently, only select pathogenic ExoD mutations with a reliable association with ultra-high TMB inform clinical practice. Thus, these findings are hypothesis-generating, require functional validation, and could potentially inform tumor classification, treatment responses, and clinical outcomes.
Project description:Cancer genomes with mutations in the exonuclease domain of Polymerase Epsilon (POLE) present with an extraordinarily high somatic mutation burden. In vitro studies have shown that distinct POLE mutants exhibit different polymerase activity. Yet, genome-wide mutation patterns and driver mutation formation arising from different POLE mutants remains unclear. Here, we curated somatic mutation calls from 7,345 colorectal cancer samples from published studies and publicly available databases. These include 44 POLE mutant samples including 9 with whole genome sequencing data available. The POLE mutant samples were categorized based on the specific POLE mutation present. Mutation spectrum, associations of somatic mutations with epigenomics features and co-occurrence with specific driver mutations were examined across different POLE mutants. We found that different POLE mutants exhibit distinct mutation spectrum with significantly higher relative frequency of C>T mutations in POLE V411L mutants. Our analysis showed that this increase frequency in C>T mutations is not dependent on DNA methylation and not associated with other genomic features and is thus specifically due to DNA sequence context alone. Notably, we found strong association of the TP53 R213* mutation specifically with POLE P286R mutants. This truncation mutation occurs within the TT[C>T]GA context. For C>T mutations, this sequence context is significantly more likely to be mutated in POLE P286R mutants compared with other POLE exonuclease domain mutants. This study refines our understanding of DNA polymerase fidelity and underscores genome-wide mutation spectrum and specific cancer driver mutation formation observed in POLE mutant cancers.
Project description:BackgroundGerm-line mutations in the exonuclease domains of the POLE and POLD1 genes are associated with an increased, but yet unquantified, risk of colorectal cancer (CRC).MethodsWe identified families with POLE or POLD1 variants by searching PubMed for relevant studies prior to October 2016 and by genotyping 669 population-based CRC cases diagnosed in patients under 60 years of age, from the Australasian Colorectal Cancer Family Registry. We estimated the age-specific cumulative risks (penetrance) using a modified segregation analysis.ResultsWe observed 67 CRCs (mean age at diagnosis = 50.2 (SD = 13.8) years) among 364 first- and second-degree relatives from 41 POLE families, and 6 CRCs (mean age at diagnosis = 39.7 (SD = 6.83) years) among 69 relatives from 9 POLD1 families. We estimated risks of CRC up to the age of 70 years (95% confidence interval) for males and females, respectively, to be 28% (95% CI, 10–42%) and 21% (95% CI, 7–33%) for POLE mutation carriers and 90% (95% CI, 33–99%) and 82% (95% CI, 26–99%) for POLD1 mutation carriers.ConclusionCRC risks for POLE mutation carriers are sufficiently high to warrant consideration of colonoscopy screening and implementation of management guidelines recommended for MSH6 mutation carriers in cases of Lynch syndrome. Refinement of estimates of CRC risk for POLD1 carriers is needed; however, clinical management recommendations could follow those made for POLE carriers.
Project description:PurposeGermline pathogenic variants in the exonuclease domain (ED) of polymerases POLE and POLD1 predispose to adenomatous polyps, colorectal cancer (CRC), endometrial tumors, and other malignancies, and exhibit increased mutation rate and highly specific associated mutational signatures. The tumor spectrum and prevalence of POLE and POLD1 variants in hereditary cancer are evaluated in this study.MethodsPOLE and POLD1 were sequenced in 2813 unrelated probands referred for genetic counseling (2309 hereditary cancer patients subjected to a multigene panel, and 504 patients selected based on phenotypic characteristics). Cosegregation and case-control studies, yeast-based functional assays, and tumor mutational analyses were performed for variant interpretation.ResultsTwelve ED missense variants, 6 loss-of-function, and 23 outside-ED predicted-deleterious missense variants, all with population allele frequencies <1%, were identified. One ED variant (POLE p.Met294Arg) was classified as likely pathogenic, four as likely benign, and seven as variants of unknown significance. The most commonly associated tumor types were colorectal, endometrial and ovarian cancers. Loss-of-function and outside-ED variants are likely not pathogenic for this syndrome.ConclusionsPolymerase proofreading-associated syndrome constitutes 0.1-0.4% of familial cancer cases, reaching 0.3-0.7% when only CRC and polyposis are considered. ED variant interpretation is challenging and should include multiple pieces of evidence.
Project description:BackgroundEndometrial carcinoma (EC) accounts for 5.8% of all cancers in Saudi females. Although most ECs are sporadic, 2-5% tend to be familial, being associated with Lynch syndrome and Cowden syndrome. In this study, we attempted to uncover the frequency, spectrum and phenotype of germline mutations in the proofreading domain of POLE and POLD1 genes in a large cohort of ECs from Middle Eastern region.MethodsWe performed Capture sequencing and Sanger sequencing to screen for proofreading domains of POLE and POLD1 genes in 432 EC cases, followed by evaluation of protein expression using immunohistochemistry. Variant interpretation was performed using PolyPhen-2, MutationAssessor, SIFT, CADD and Mutation Taster.ResultsIn our cohort, four mutations (0.93%) were identified in 432 EC cases, two each in POLE and POLD1 proofreading domains. Furthermore, low expression of POLE and POLD1 was noted in 41.1% (170/1414) and 59.9% (251/419) of cases, respectively. Both the cases harboring POLE mutation showed high nuclear expression of POLE protein, whereas, of the two POLD1 mutant cases, one case showed high expression and another case showed low expression of POLD1 protein.ConclusionsOur study shows that germline mutations in POLE and POLD1 proofreading region are a rare cause of EC in Middle Eastern population. However, it is still feasible to screen multiple cancer related genes in EC patients from Middle Eastern region using multigene panels including POLE and POLD1.