Dataset Information

A targeted solution for estimating the cell-type composition of bulk samples.

ABSTRACT:

Background

To avoid false-positive findings and detect cell-type specific associations in methylation and transcription investigations with bulk samples, it is critical to know the proportions of the major cell-types.

Results

We present a novel approach that allows for precise estimation of cell-type proportions using only a few highly informative methylation markers. The most reliable estimates were obtained with 17 amplicons (34 CpGs) using the MuSiC estimator, for which the average correlations between the estimated and the true cell-type proportions were 0.889. Furthermore, the estimates were not significantly different from the true values (P = 0.95) indicating that the estimator is unbiased and the standard deviation of the estimates further indicate high precision. Moreover, the overall variability of the estimates as measured by the Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), which is a function of both bias and precision, was low (mean RMSE = 0.038). Taken together, these results indicate that the approach produced reliable estimates that are both unbiased and highly precise.

Conclusion

This cost-effective approach for estimating cell-type proportions in bulk samples allows for enhanced targeted analysis, which in turn will minimize the risk of reporting false-positive findings and allowing for detection of cell-type specific associations. The approach is applicable across platforms and can be extended to assess cell-type proportions for various tissues.

SUBMITTER: van den Oord EJCG

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8474864 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is one of the malignant hematologic cancers with rapid progress and poor prognosis. Most AML prognostic stratifications focused on genetic abnormalities. However, none of them was established based on the cell type compositions (CTCs) of peripheral blood or bone marrow aspirates from patients at diagnosis. Here we sought to develop a novel prognostic model for AML in adults based on the CTCs. First, we applied the CIBERSORT algorithm to estimate the CTCs for patients from two public datasets (GSE6891 and TCGA-LAML) using a custom gene expression signature reference constructed by an AML single-cell RNA sequencing dataset (GSE116256). Then, a CTC-based prognostic model was established using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox regression, termed CTC score. The constructed prognostic model CTC score comprised 3 cell types, GMP-like, HSC-like, and T. Compared with the low-CTC-score group, the high-CTC-score group showed a 1.57-fold [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.23 to 2.00; p = 0.0002] and a 2.32-fold (95% CI, 1.53 to 3.51; p < 0.0001) higher overall mortality risk in the training set (GSE6891) and validation set (TCGA-LAML), respectively. When adjusting for age at diagnosis, cytogenetic risk, and karyotype, the CTC score remained statistically significant in both the training set [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.25; 95% CI, 1.20 to 4.24; p = 0.0119] and the validation set (HR = 7.97; 95% CI, 2.95 to 21.56; p < 0.0001]. We further compared the performance of the CTC score with two gene expression-based prognostic scores: the 17-gene leukemic stem cell score (LSC17 score) and the AML prognostic score (APS). It turned out that the CTC score achieved comparable performance at 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-years timepoints and provided independent and additional prognostic information different from the LSC17 score and APS. In conclusion, the CTC score could serve as a powerful prognostic marker for AML and has great potential to assist clinicians to formulate individualized treatment plans.

Project description:While single-cell experiments provide deep cellular resolution within a single sample, some single-cell experiments are inherently more challenging than bulk experiments due to dissociation difficulties, cost, or limited tissue availability. This creates a situation where we have deep cellular profiles of one sample or condition, and bulk profiles across multiple samples and conditions. To bridge this gap, we propose BuDDI (BUlk Deconvolution with Domain Invariance). BuDDI utilizes domain adaptation techniques to effectively integrate available corpora of case-control bulk and reference scRNA-seq observations to infer cell-type-specific perturbation effects. BuDDI achieves this by learning independent latent spaces within a single variational autoencoder (VAE) encompassing at least four sources of variability: 1) cell-type proportion, 2) perturbation effect, 3) structured experimental variability, and 4) remaining variability. Since each latent space is encouraged to be independent, we simulate perturbation responses by independently composing each latent space to simulate cell-type-specific perturbation responses. We evaluated BuDDI's performance on simulated and real data with experimental designs of increasing complexity. We first validated that BuDDI could learn domain invariant latent spaces on data with matched samples across each source of variability. Then we validated that BuDDI could accurately predict cell-type-specific perturbation response when no single-cell perturbed profiles were used during training; instead, only bulk samples had both perturbed and non-perturbed observations. Finally, we validated BuDDI on predicting sex-specific differences, an experimental design where it is not possible to have matched samples. In each experiment, BuDDI outperformed all other comparative methods and baselines. As more reference atlases are completed, BuDDI provides a path to combine these resources with bulk-profiled treatment or disease signatures to study perturbations, sex differences, or other factors at single-cell resolution.