Dataset Information

Bleeding risks with novel oral anticoagulants especially rivaroxaban versus aspirin: a meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

This pairwise meta-analysis determines the difference in bleeding risks associated with the use of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and aspirin.

Methods

PubMed, the Cochrane Library database, clinicaltrial.gov , and related studies were searched for randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing NOAC and aspirin published between January 1, 2000 and May 10, 2021. The primary endpoint was intracranial hemorrhage (ICH).

Results

Eleven studies involving 57,645 patients were included. Compared to aspirin, rivaroxaban (5 mg/day) had a similar risk of ICH, major bleeding, and fatal bleeding; rivaroxaban (10 mg/day) had higher risks of gastrointestinal hemorrhage (OR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.03-1.94; P = 0.032; I² = 0%) and a similar risk of ICH, major bleeding, and fatal bleeding; and rivaroxaban (15-20 mg/day) had higher risks of ICH (OR: 3.21; 95% CI: 1.36-7.60; P = 0.008; I² = 0%), major bleeding (OR: 2.64; 95% CI: 1.68-4.16; P < 0.001; I² = 0%), and fatal bleeding (OR: 2.26; 95% CI: 1.25-4.08; P = 0.007; I² = 0%) and a similar risk of gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Bleeding outcomes between other NOACs (apixaban and dabigatran etexilate) and aspirin were not different.

Conclusions

The bleeding risks associated with NOACs depend on drug type and dosage. For ≥15 mg/day of rivaroxaban, the risk of ICH was significantly higher than that with aspirin. However, further studies comparing dabigatran etexilate and apixaban versus aspirin are warranted to draw a definite conclusion.

SUBMITTER: Chen X

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8487538 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background Data on the effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulant (OAC) agents in very elderly nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients with high bleeding risk are lacking. Objectives This study examined 2-year outcomes and effects of OAC agents among these patients using the ANAFIE (All Nippon Atrial Fibrillation in the Elderly) registry (N = 32,275) data. Methods Patients were classified into high-risk (age: ≥80 years; CHADS2 score: ≥2; and presence of ≥1 bleeding risk factor: creatinine clearance of 15-30 mL/minute, prior bleeding at critical sites, body weight of ≤45 kg, or continuous antiplatelet use) and reference groups. Results In the high-risk (n = 7,104) and reference (n = 25,171) group patients, 89.0% and 93.4%, respectively, used OAC agents. Of these, respectively, 30.1% and 24.2% used warfarin, and 58.9% and 69.1% used direct-acting OAC (DOAC) agents. Compared with the reference group, the high-risk group had higher incidences of stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding, cardiovascular events, and all-cause death. In the high-risk group, DOAC agent use vs nonuse of OAC agents was associated with reduced incidences of stroke/systemic embolism (HR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.36-0.79) and all-cause death (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.52-0.81) but not with major bleeding (HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.63-1.89). DOAC agents were superior to warfarin in effectiveness and safety. For high-risk patients, history of major bleeding, severe liver dysfunction, and falls within 1 year were independent risk factors for major bleeding. Conclusions High-risk elderly nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients had higher event incidences. DOAC agents were associated with reduced risk of stroke/systemic embolism and all-cause death vs nonuse of OAC agents or warfarin. (Prospective Observational Study in Late-Stage Elderly Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation [ANAFIE registry]; UMIN000024006) Central Illustration

Project description:ImportanceIt is unclear if the risk of intraocular bleeding with novel oral anticoagulants differs compared with warfarin.ObjectiveTo characterize the risk of intraocular bleeding with novel oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin.Data sourcesA systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken in an academic medical setting. MEDLINE and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for randomized clinical trials published up until August 2016. This search was supplemented by manual bibliography searches of identified trials and other review articles.Study selectionStudies were eligible for inclusion if they were phase 3 randomized clinical trials, enrolled patients with atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism, compared a novel oral anticoagulant (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban) with warfarin, and recorded event data on intraocular bleeding. Data on intraocular bleeding were pooled using inverse-variance, weighted, fixed-effects meta-analysis.Data extraction and synthesisThe PRISMA guidelines were used for abstracting data and assessing quality. Independent extraction was performed by 2 investigators.Main outcomes and measuresIntraocular bleeding events and associated risk ratio for novel oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin.ResultsTwelve trials investigating 102?627 patients were included. Randomization to novel oral anticoagulants was associated with a 22% relative reduction in intraocular bleeding compared with warfarin (risk ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61-0.99). There was no significant heterogeneity observed (I2?=?4.8%, P?=?.40). Comparably lower risks of intraocular bleeding with novel oral anticoagulants were seen in subgroup analyses, with no significant difference according to the indication for anticoagulation (P for heterogeneity?=?.49) or the novel oral anticoagulant type (P for heterogeneity?=?.15). Summary estimates did not differ materially when random-effects meta-analytic techniques were used.Conclusions and relevanceThese results suggest that novel oral anticoagulants reduce the risk of intraocular bleeding by approximately one-fifth compared with warfarin. Similar benefits were seen in both patients with atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. Our data have particular relevance for patients at higher risk of spontaneous retinal and subretinal bleeding. These findings may also have important implications in the perioperative period, in which the use of novel oral anticoagulants may be superior. Future studies are required to better characterize the optimal management of patients with both ophthalmic disease and cardiovascular comorbidities requiring anticoagulation.