Dataset Information

Treatment patterns in pediatric patients with multiple sclerosis in Germany-a nationwide claim-based analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The manifestation of multiple sclerosis (MS) in childhood and adolescence occurs in 3%-5% of all MS cases. However, the immunomodulatory and symptomatic treatment options in this population group are still limited.

Objective

We aimed to elucidate the prescription frequency of medications used in pediatric patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) compared with the general population, considering the entire spectrum of medications prescribed.

Methods

Based on nationwide outpatient drug prescription data and statutory health insurance (SHI) physicians' claims data from 2018, we conducted a population-based cross-sectional study in Germany. Children and adolescents aged ⩽17 years (n = 11,381,939) diagnosed with MS (n = 613), and a matched (age, sex, and health insurance sector) control group (n = 6130) were included. The prescription prevalence was measured as the proportion of MS patients with ⩾1 prescription.

Results

Of the 613 pediatric PwMS with a median age of 16 years, 403 (65.7%) were female. For 15 out of the 18 different active agents analyzed, PwMS had a significantly higher prescription prevalence than the control group (Fisher's exact test: p ⩽ 0.037). The most frequently prescribed drugs in PwMS were ibuprofen (28.4%; anti-inflammatory drug), cholecalciferol (23.0%; vitamin D3), and interferon beta-1a (21.5%; disease-modifying drug, DMD). The proportions of DMD prescriptions and antibiotic prescriptions were higher among PwMS aged 15-17 years than among those ⩽14 years (DMD: 43.4% vs 34.2%, p = 0.05; antibiotic: 34.1% vs 24.8%, p = 0.031). In contrast, younger PwMS were more likely to receive a prescription for anti-inflammatory/anti-rheumatic drugs (36.6% vs 26.5%, p = 0.02).

Conclusion

Our study analyzing real-world medication data showed that interferon beta, anti-inflammatory drugs, and vitamins play an essential role in the treatment of pediatric PwMS. Future research should evaluate longitudinal treatment patterns of pediatric PwMS, paying particular attention to the time of diagnosis, time of first DMD initiation, and therapy switches.

SUBMITTER: Frahm N

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8504210 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:INTRODUCTION:The aim of this study was to describe the real-word treatment and associated healthcare resource use (HCRU) of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, as stratified by different MS subtypes. METHODS:All patients with MS continuously insured by two German statutory healthcare insurance funds from 2011 to 2015 were enrolled. These patients were categorized into four subgroups according to their MS type as follows: clinically isolated syndrome (CIS); relapsing remittent MS (RRMS); primary progressive MS (PPMS); and secondary progressive MS (SPMS). Sociodemographic characteristics, treatments, and HCRU for 2015 were analyzed. Treatment cascades for treatment-naïve patients were also determined. RESULTS:A total of 13,333 patients with MS were identified. The largest proportion of patients had RRMS (41.9%), followed by PPMS (17.1%). Mean age of the enrolled patients was 50.2 years, and 70.7% were female. Among all patients, 38.3% of those with CIS, 22.4% with PPMS, 69.6% with RRMS, and 33.9% with SPMS received a prescription of a disease-modifying immunomodulatory agent, with interferon beta-1a being the most frequently prescribed agent. Likewise, 14.5, 18.5, 19.9, and 21.5% of patients with CIS, PPMS, RRMS, and SPMS, respectively, received a flare-up treatment with glucocorticoids. MS-associated overall costs, including indirect costs for MS-associated days absent from work, were € 16,433, with costs related to MS medication (€ 8770; 53.4%) being the main driver of costs in all subgroups. MS-associated costs according to MS subtypes were € 12,427 for CIS patients, € 14,459 for PPMS patients, € 20,583 for RRMS patients, and € 17,554 for SPMS patients. CONCLUSION:Among the four MS subtypes, RRMS patients most often received a disease-modifying immunomodulatory treatment. Consequently, healthcare costs were highest for patients with this MS subtype. Contrary to the treatment guideline, a substantial percentage of patients with CIS, RRMS, and SPMS did not receive any disease-modifying immunomodulatory treatment.

Project description:BackgroundMultiple sclerosis (MS) is a leading cause of disability among young adults and effects considerable social and economic burdens. Data of MS incidence in China at the national level is lacking. We conducted the first nationwide hospital-based study to estimate the incidence and hospitalization burden of MS in China.MethodsThis study is based on an administrative database of the National Hospital Quality Monitoring System, which covers all 1665 tertiary hospitals in mainland China. The "Medical Record Homepage" of all patients, including 346 variables including demographic characteristics, diagnoses, procedures, and expenses etc., were uniformly collected across each tertiary hospital via standard protocol. MS was defined by the 2010 International Panel criteria for MS and was identified by ICD-10 code (G35•0).FindingsWe identified 27,336 hospital admissions for 15,060 MS patients from 2016 to 2018; amongst these patients, 9,879 were newly diagnosed. The age- and sex-adjusted incidence per 100,000 person-years is 0•235 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0•230-0•240), with 0•055 (0•050-0•060) in children and 0•288 (0•282-0•294) in adults, respectively. The female to male ratio is 2•02; the peak disease onset is age of 40-49 years. Residents in high-latitude and high-altitude areas are more likely to develop MS (F = 8•99; p < 0•001). Prevalent comorbidities include hypertension (18•8%), diabetes (7•2%), stroke (14•7%), depression or anxiety (3•7%), and autoimmune disease (2•3%). Through 2016-2018, 104 adults and 2 children died, with a hospital mortality rate of 9•9 per 1,000 person-years.InterpretationFor the first time, we obtain the national incidence of MS as 0.055 in children and 0.288 in adults per 100,000 in China. The geographical distribution of MS incidence presented a north-south latitude gradient and a west-east altitude gradient.FundingNational Science Foundation of China (81801199, 91642205, and 81830038); Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing.

Project description:BackgroundMalignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare cancer with a poor prognosis. Centralization of rare cancer in dedicated centers is recommended to ensure expertise, multidisciplinarity and access to innovation. In Italy, expert centers for MPM have not been identified in all regions. We aimed to describe the treatment patterns among MPM patients across different Italian regions and to identify factors associated with the treatment patterns across the regions.MethodsWe performed an observational study on a random sample of 2026 MPM patients diagnosed in 2003-2008. We included 26 population-based registries covering 70% of the Italian population. To identify factors associated with treatment patterns, across the different regions, we fitted a multinomial logistic regression model adjusted by age, sex, stage, histology and hospital with thoracic surgical department.ResultsMPM patients mostly received chemotherapy alone (41%) or no cancer-directed therapy (36%) especially the older patients. The first course of treatment for MPM patients differed across regions. Patients from Piedmont, Liguria and Campania were more likely to receive no cancer-directed therapy; those living in Tuscany and Sicily were more likely to get surgery; patients from Marche and Lazio were more likely to receive chemotherapy. These differences were not explained by age, sex, stage, histology and availability of a thoracic surgery department.ConclusionsThere is limited expertise available and lack of a network able to maximize the expertise available may contribute to explaining the results of our study. Our findings support the need to ensure the appropriate care of all MPM patients in reorganizing the health care services.Key pointsSignificant findings of the study: MPM patients mostly received chemotherapy alone or no cancer-directed therapy especially the older patients. The first course of treatment for MPM patients differed across Italian regions.What this study addsDifferences in MPM clinical management are not explained by the age, stage, histology nor by the availability of a thoracic surgery department. Limited expertise for MPM contribute to explaining the unequal access to appropriate care for MPM patients in Italy.