Root resorption associated with maxillary buccal segment intrusion using variable force magnitudes: A randomized clinical trial.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objectives
To compare the root resorption resulting from miniscrew-supported maxillary posterior dentoalveolar intrusion using two different force magnitudes.Materials and
Methods: Adult patients with skeletal open bite, indicated for maxillary posterior dentoalveolar intrusion, were recruited and randomly assigned to the comparison or intervention groups. The comparison group involved applying 200 g of intrusive force per segment, which measured 20 g per root, while this force was 400 g per segment in the intervention group, measuring 40 g per root.Results
Twenty participants were included in the final analysis after 2 patients dropped out, 1 in each group, to end up with 10 subjects (200 roots) per group. There was statistically significant root resorption of 0.84 ± 0.96 mm and 0.93 ± 1.00 mm in the comparison and the intervention groups, respectively. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups.Conclusions
Root resorption inevitably took place in association with orthodontic intrusion. However, increasing the magnitude of the intrusive force did not increase the amount of root resorption, either statistically or clinically.
SUBMITTER: Akl HE
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8549556 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:ObjectivesTo compare the effects of two different force magnitudes on maxillary posterior segment intrusion using mini-screws. The null hypothesis was that there would be no difference between the two force magnitudes.Materials and methodsAdult patients with skeletal open bite and a dental open bite ranging from 3 to 8 mm were recruited for this trial. The comparator group had 200 g of intrusive force applied for posterior segment intrusion, whereas 400 g of force was applied in the intervention group. Primary outcomes were the amount of posterior teeth intrusion and anterior open bite closure.ResultsTwenty-two subjects were randomized to include 11 participants in each group. One participant dropped out in each group, leaving us with 10 subjects to be analyzed per group. There was statistically significant posterior teeth intrusion of 2.42 ± 2.06 and 2.26 ± 1.87 mm for the comparator and intervention groups, respectively, with no difference between them. Statistically significant open bite closure was achieved in both groups, measuring 2.24 ± 1.18 and 3.15 ± 1.06 mm in the comparator and intervention groups, respectively, with no difference between them.ConclusionsBoth the 200 g and 400 g intrusive forces yielded similar outcomes in terms of posterior teeth intrusion and anterior open bite closure.
| S-EPMC8028465 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAn orthodontic device that moves teeth with pulsating force was invented and underwent a single center, controlled, clinical trial to test its safety and efficacy for treatment. The device has a custom-made thermo-plastic mouthpiece which fits over the teeth with an inflatable silicone element. A console that measures and controls the pulsating force level in real-time controls the air pressure that delivers a pulsating force. In this study, the effect of the device on root resorption during orthodontic treatment was evaluated using 3D cone beam computed tomography and compared with a control group of patients who received Invisalign treatment.MethodsTwenty-eight subjects were enrolled in the investigational arm and 15 in the control group. Subjects were followed until the average score of the mandibular and maxillary teeth achieved a Little's Irregularity Index of 1.5 mm or less.ResultsThere were no adverse events reported throughout the study for either treatment arm. No clinically significant root resorption was observed for either group. The investigational device did not cause root resorption greater than the control group. Both devices produced a safety profile compared to current orthodontic techniques.ConclusionThe investigational device did not produce more root resorption than similar conventional orthodontic appliances.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03421886 . Registered 12 January 2018 - Retrospectively registered.
| S-EPMC7457283 | biostudies-literature
Project description:OBJECTIVE:To compare the root and alveolar bone changes in first premolars adjacent to the orthodontic traction of buccal versus palatal maxillary impacted canines (MIC). MATERIALS AND METHODS:Before and after traction, cone beam tomographic computed (CBCTs) of 25 subjects with unilateral/bilateral MIC were included in this follow-up and retrospective study. Thirty-six first premolars were divided into 2 groups, buccal (n = 15) or palatal (n = 21) MIC, and the tomographic images were evaluated before and after orthodontic traction. Root changes in length and area were measured in sagittal, coronal and axial sections. Dimensions of alveolar bone were evaluated in coronal sections. Intergroup and intragroup comparisons were performed using t or Mann-Whitney U tests. Multiple linear regressions analyses were used to evaluate the influence of all predictor variables on root and alveolar bone changes (P<0.05). RESULTS:Root and alveolar bone changes produced by orthodontic traction were not significant between groups. Root changes were smaller than 1 mm (length) and 2.51 mm2 (area). Alveolar bone changes between buccal and palatal MIC groups ranged from 0.13 mm to 1.69 mm Furthermore, the multivariate analysis showed no significant influence of the impaction condition (buccal or palatal) on root change. Nevertheless, some different predictor variables of the MIC influence these changes. In the alveolar bone, the maximum upper alveolar width (MUAW) is the most affected by the traction of the MIC. CONCLUSIONS:Orthodontic traction of buccal vs palatal MIC produces similar resorptive and appositional root and alveolar bone changes in the adjacent first premolars, without clinical relevance.
| S-EPMC6903742 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe study aimed to compare external root resorption (ERR) three-dimensionally in subjects treated with tooth-borne (TB) versus bone-borne (BB) rapid maxillary expansion (RME). Forty subjects who received tooth-borne RME (TB group, average age 13.3 years ± 1.10 years) or bone-borne RME (BB group, average age 14.7 ± 1.15 years) were assessed using CBCT imaging before treatment (T0) and after a 6-month retention period (T1). 3D reconstructions of the radicular anatomy of maxillary first molars (M1), first and second premolars (P1 and P2) were generated to calculate volumetric (mean and percentage values) and shape changes (deviation analysis of the radicular models) obtained at each time point. 2D assessment of radicular length changes was also performed for each tooth. Data were statistically analyzed to perform intra-group (different teeth) and inter-group comparisons.ResultsIn both groups, all the investigated teeth showed a significant reduction in radicular volume and length (p < 0.05), with the first molars being the teeth most affected by the resorption process (volume and palatal root length). When volumetric radicular changes were calculated as a percentage of the pre-treatment volumes, no differences were found among the investigated teeth (p > 0.05). Based on the deviation analysis from radicular models superimposition, the areas most affected by shape change were the apex and bucco-medial root surface. Overall, the amount of ERR was significantly greater in the TB group (mm3: M1 = 17.03, P1 = 6.42, P2 = 5.26) compared to the BB group (mm3: M1 = 3.11, P1 = 1.04, P2 = 1.24).ConclusionsDespite the statistical significance, the difference in the amount of ERR of the posterior maxillary dentition between TB-RME and BB-RME remains clinically questionable.
| S-EPMC9719874 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveThe primary objective of this study was to quantify the orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) and orthodontically induced root resorption (OIRR) with differential force system in conjunction with minimal surgical insult.Material and methods15-week-old, 48 male Wistar rats were used in the research and were randomly divided into six groups: 1. Group 1 (8 Wistar rats): OTM for 14 days with 8-g force; 2. Group 2 (8 Wistar rats): OTM for 14 days with 25-g force; 3. Group 3 (8 Wistar rats): OTM for 14 days with 100-g force; 4. Group 4 (8 Wistar rats): OTM for 14 days with 8-g force and alveolar decortications (ADs); 5. Group 5 (8 Wistar rats): OTM for 14 days with 25-g force and ADs; 6. Group 6 (8 Wistar rats): OTM for 14 days with 100-g force and ADs. A nickel-titanium spring was used to protract the molar mesially using maxillary incisors as an anchorage. ADs (minimal surgical insult) were done using a hand piece and a round bur, adjacent to the left first maxillary molar on the palatal alveolar bone. After 14 days of OTM, Wistar rats were killed and microfocus computed tomography and histological analysis were performed.ResultsThe 100-g group showed significant increase (P < 0.05) in OTM. However, with ADs, the OTM was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in 8 and 100 g. In addition, with ADs, there is significant increase (P < 0.05) in OIRR and significant decrease (P < 0.05) in bone volume fraction. Histological quantification of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase indicated a significant increase (P < 0.05) in the number of osteoclasts with ADs when compared without ADs.ConclusionsLight force in conjunction with ADs are optimal to accelerate the OTM. Additionally, ADs increases the OIRR.
| S-EPMC8643401 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundDeep bite is a common characteristic of malocclusion, and many methods are used to treat it, including mini-implants used for the intrusion of the upper incisors. Orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption (OIIRR) is an inevitable and unexpected side effect of orthodontic therapy. However, resorption of the root could be affected by the type of tooth movement, such as intrusion. Several studies have indicated the effectiveness of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in accelerating orthodontic movement, but studies that have evaluated the role of this laser in reducing the risk of OIIRR have been limited. This trial aimed to investigate the effectiveness of LLLT in reducing the resorption of the roots of the upper incisors during their intrusion in the context of deep bite correction.Materials and methodsThirty patients (13 males, 17 females; mean age 22.4±3.37 years) with deep overbite were recruited and allocated to the laser or the control groups. Mini-implants were inserted between the roots of the upper central incisors and the lateral incisors from the labial aspect at the gingival-mucosal junction on both sides with a force of 40 g on each side through an NiTi coil spring. A low-level laser (Ga-Al-As) with 808 nm wavelength in a continuous mode, with the parameters 250 milliwatt power output, 4 Joules/point energy density, and 16 seconds irradiation per point, was applied to the root of each of the upper incisors. The laser was applied on the first day of the upper incisor intrusion (T1), then on days 3, 7, and 14 of the first month. In the second month, the laser was applied every 15 days, adjusting the spring strength every four weeks until the end of the intrusion stage (T2), which was determined by reaching a normal overbite. As for patients in the control group, the strength of the nickel-titanium springs was adjusted every four weeks to the required strength of 40 g on each end until reaching a normal overbite.ResultsThere was a volumetric decrease in both groups' upper central and lateral incisors roots, and this decrease was statistically significant (P<0.001). However, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant in each central and lateral incisor volume root (P=0.345 and 0.263 for U1 and U2, respectively). Also, both groups had a linear decrease in upper central and lateral incisors roots, which was statistically significant (P<0.001). At the same time, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant in each central and lateral incisor root length (P=0.343 and 0.461 for U1 and U2, respectively).ConclusionThe low-level laser irradiation using the current protocol did not significantly affect the amount of root resorption induced by incisor intrusion in the experimental group compared to the control group.
| S-EPMC9950033 | biostudies-literature
Project description:When orthodontic patients desire shorter treatment times with aesthetic results and long-term stability, it is important for the orthodontist to understand the potential limitations and problems that may arise during standard and/or technology-assisted accelerated treatment. Bone density plays an important role in facilitating orthodontic tooth movement (OTM), such that reductions in bone density can significantly increase movement velocity. Lifestyle, genetic background, environmental factors, and disease status all can influence a patients' overall health and bone density. In some individuals, these factors may create specific conditions that influence systemic-wide bone metabolism. Both genetic variation and the onset of a bone-related disease can influence systemic bone density and local bone density, such as observed in the mandible and maxilla. These types of localized density changes can affect the rate of OTM and may also influence the risk of unwanted outcomes, i.e., the occurrence of dental external apical root resorption (EARR).
| S-EPMC5106316 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundExternal root resorption is a pathological process, which tends to occur following a wide range of mechanical or chemical stimuli such as infection, pressure, trauma or orthodontic tooth movement. Although it is predominantly detected by radiography, in some cases root resorption may be identified by clinical symptoms such as pain, swelling and mobility of the tooth. Treatment alternatives are case-dependent and aim to address the cause of the resorption and aid the regeneration of the resorptive lesion.ObjectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness of any interventions that can be used in the management of external root resorption in permanent teeth.Search methodsThe following electronic databases were searched: the Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register (to 14 October 2015), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, 2015, Issue 9), MEDLINE via OVID (1946 to 14 October 2015) and EMBASE via OVID (1980 to 14 October 2015). We searched the US National Institutes of Health Trials Register (http://clinicaltrials.gov) and the WHO Clinical Trials Registry Platform for ongoing trials. No restrictions were placed on the language or date of publication when searching the electronic databases.Selection criteriaWe included randomised controlled trials of permanent teeth with any type of external root resorption, which has been confirmed by clinical and radiological examination, comparing one type of intervention (root canal medications and canal filling, splinting or extraction of teeth or the surgical removal of any relevant pathology) with another, or with placebo or no treatment.Data collection and analysisTwo review authors screened search records independently. Full papers were obtained for potentially relevant trials. If data had been extracted, the statistical guidelines set out in the Cochrane Handbook would have been followed.Main resultsNo randomised controlled trials that met the inclusion criteria were identified. However, we identified one ongoing study that is potentially relevant to this review and will be assessed when it is published.Authors' conclusionsWe were unable to identify any reports of randomised controlled trials regarding the efficacy of different interventions for the management of external root resorption. In view of the lack of reliable evidence on this topic, clinicians must decide on the most appropriate means of managing this condition according to their clinical experience with regard to patient-related factors. There is a need for well designed and conducted clinical trials on this topic, which conform to the CONSORT statement (www.consort-statement.org/).
| S-EPMC7185846 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundControversial results have been reported regarding the impact of photobiomodulation (PBM) on orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption (OIIRR). The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of two PBM protocols, one of them requiring a high application frequency (on days 0, 3, 7, 14, then every 2 weeks), while the second requires less frequent applications (every 3 weeks), on OIIRR accompanying orthodontic treatment.MethodsTwenty female patients were recruited for this randomized controlled trial, requiring the therapeutic extraction of maxillary first premolars, and they were randomly divided into 2 equal groups. In Group A, one side of the maxillary arch randomly received PBM on days 0, 3, 7, 14, and every 2 weeks thereafter, while in Group B, one side was randomly chosen to receive PBM every 3 weeks. The laser applied was a Diode laser with a wavelength of 980 nm, in a continuous mode. Canine retraction in both groups was carried out using closed-coil springs, delivering 150 g of force, and the force level was checked every 3 weeks, over a 12-week study period. Pre-retraction and post-retraction cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was done for the evaluation of OIIRR.ResultsNo significant differences in the amount of OIIRR have been reported between the laser and control sides in both groups A and B. Also, no significant differences have been reported between the laser sides in both groups.ConclusionsPhotobiomodulation does not affect OIIRR, whether by increasing or decreasing its occurrence, with both laser application protocols. Therefore, it can be stated that PBM does not result in root resorption less than the commonly observed range elicited with conventional orthodontic treatment, and that it has no effect on OIIRR. Trial registration Two Low-level Laser Irradiation Protocols on the Rate of Canine Retraction (NCT04926389), 15/06/2021-retrospectively registered. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04926389 .
| S-EPMC9167544 | biostudies-literature
Project description:To review studies investigating if genetic factors play a role in external apical root resorption (EARR) during orthodontic treatment. Heritability estimation in human sib-pairs, comparison of multiple inbred mouse strains, human sib-pair linkage and parents-child trio association studies, and two gene (Il-1b, and P2rx7) knock out mouse models. Heritability for EARR of the maxillary central incisors concurrent with orthodontic treatment is 0.8. DBA/2J, BALB/cJ, and 129P3/J inbred mouse strains are highly susceptible (p < .05) to histological root resorption (RR) associated with orthodontic force (RRAOF), whereas A/J, C57BL/6J and SJL/J mice are resistant. Non-parametric sibling pair linkage analysis identified evidence of linkage (LOD = 2.5; p = 0.02) of EARR with microsatellite D18S64 (tightly linked to TNFRSF11A, also known as RANK). There is significant linkage disequilibrium of IL-1B (p = 0.0003), and OPG (p = 0.003) with EARR. RRAOF increases in Il1b KO (p < or = 0.013), and increases in P2rx7 KO (p < 0.02) mice compared to wild-type. Genetic factors play a marked role in EARR concurrent with orthodontic force, accounting for one-half to two-thirds of the variation. Two pathways for this may involve: 1) activation control of osteoclasts through the ATP/P2XR7/IL-1B inflammation modulation pathway; and 2) RANK/RANKL/OPG osteoclast activation control. Histological RR occurs and is typically healed. If resorption outpaces healing, then EARR develops. Normal and parafunctional forces, as well as orthodontic forces, may add to or interact with the individual's susceptibility to pass the threshold of developing EARR.
| S-EPMC5161460 | biostudies-literature